Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T16:46:55.196Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Things, Relations and Identity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Edwin B. Allaire
Edwin B. Allaire*
Affiliation:
University of Iowa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Philosophers have long believed that if the Principle of the Identity of Indiscernibles were logically true, there would be no problem of individuation. I show (a) that if spatial relations are, as seems plausible, of such a nature that it makes no sense to say of one thing that it is related to itself, then the Principle is a logical truth, asserting that a certain kind of state of affairs is impossible because the kind of sentence purporting to express it is ill-formed and (b) that even if the Principle were such a truth the problem of individuation would remain. I then examine some of what Leibniz and Wittgenstein have said about the notions of individuation, difference and non-identity.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 34 , Issue 3 , September 1967 , pp. 260 - 272
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Allaire, Edwin B., “Another Look at Bare Particulars,” Philosophical Studies, 16. pp. 16–21.10.1007/BF00398838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Bergmann, Gustav, Logic and Reality, University of Wisconsin Press, 1964.Google Scholar
[3] Bergmann, Gustav, Meaning and Existence, University of Wisconsin Press, 1960.Google Scholar
[4] Bergmann, Gustav, “Russell's Examination of Leibniz Examined,” Philosophy of Science, 33, 175–203; reprinted in [3], pp. 155–188.Google Scholar
[5] Leibniz, Gottfried, New Essays Concerning Human Understanding, The Open Court Publishing Company, 1949.Google Scholar
[6] Russell, Bertrand, “On the Relations of Universals and Particulars,” Logic and Knowledge, George Allen and Unwin Ltd., 1956, pp. 105–124.Google Scholar
[7] Wittgenstein, Ludwig, Notebooks 1914–1916, Blackwell, 1961, p. 51e.Google Scholar