Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Vranas, Peter B. M.
2002.
Who's Afraid of Undermining?.
Erkenntnis,
Vol. 57,
Issue. 2,
p.
151.
VRANAS, PETER B. M.
2004.
Have Your Cake and Eat It Too: The Old Principal Principle Reconciled with the New*.
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research,
Vol. 69,
Issue. 2,
p.
368.
Nelson, Kevin
2009.
On background: using two-argument chance.
Synthese,
Vol. 166,
Issue. 1,
p.
165.
Briggs, Rachael
2009.
The Anatomy of the Big Bad Bug*.
Noûs,
Vol. 43,
Issue. 3,
p.
428.
Briggs, Rachael
2015.
Foundations of Probability.
Journal of Philosophical Logic,
Vol. 44,
Issue. 6,
p.
625.
Rédei, Miklós
and
Gyenis, Zalán
2016.
Measure Theoretic Analysis of Consistency of the Principal Principle.
Philosophy of Science,
Vol. 83,
Issue. 5,
p.
972.
Gyenis, Zalán
and
Rédei, Miklós
2017.
Making it Formally Explicit.
Vol. 6,
Issue. ,
p.
3.
Park, Ilho
2021.
Correcting credences with chances.
Synthese,
Vol. 198,
Issue. 1,
p.
509.
Fischer, Marc
2021.
On the principal principle and imprecise subjective Bayesianism.
European Journal for Philosophy of Science,
Vol. 11,
Issue. 2,
Wroński, Leszek
Gyenis, Zalán
and
Cocchiaro, Mariangela Zoe
2022.
What chance-credence norms should be.
Synthese,
Vol. 200,
Issue. 6,
Belot, Gordon
2023.
That Does Not Compute: David Lewis on Credence and Chance.
Philosophy of Science,
Vol. 90,
Issue. 5,
p.
1130.
BELOT, GORDON
2024.
UNPRINCIPLED.
The Review of Symbolic Logic,
Vol. 17,
Issue. 2,
p.
435.