Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T12:29:26.826Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

When Is a Brain Like the Planet?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Clark Glymour
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Time series of macroscopic quantities that are aggregates of microscopic quantities, with unknown one-many relations between macroscopic and microscopic states, are common in applied sciences, from economics to climate studies. When such time series of macroscopic quantities are claimed to be causal, the causal relations postulated are representable by a directed acyclic graph and associated probability distribution—sometimes called a dynamical Bayes net. Causal interpretations of such series imply claims that hypothetical manipulations of macroscopic variables have unambiguous effects on variables “downstream” in the graph, and such macroscopic variables may be predictably produced or altered even while particular microstates are not. This paper argues that such causal time series of macroscopic aggregates of microscopic processes are the appropriate model for mental causation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 74 , Issue 3 , July 2007 , pp. 330 - 346
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

‡

I am grateful to Jim Woodward, Michael Strevens, Elliott Sober, and John Campbell for valuable comments and corrections to a previous draft of this essay and to the participants in a conference on fMRI issues sponsored by the Rutgers Department of Philosophy in 2006, and especially to Steve Hanson, for stimulating discussions that caused substantial revisions in this essay. The graph of Figure 5 was obtained by Joseph Ramsey by applying a Bayesian search procedure, the Greedy Equivalence Search algorithm, implemented in the TETRAD IV program (http://www.phil.cmu.edu/projects/tetrad) to the lagged variables of unpublished data from Steve Hanson's laboratory. The title of this essay was offered as a joke by Mara Harrell, but I took it seriously. Research for this paper was supported in part by a grant to the University of California, Berkeley from the James S. McDonnell Foundation, by grants from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration to Carnegie Mellon University and to the Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition, and by a grant to Rutgers and Carnegie Mellon from the James S. McDonnell Foundation.

References

Bergson, H. ([1911] 1998), Creative Evolution, Translated by Mitchell, Arthur. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Bickle, J. (1998), Psychoneural Reduction: The New Wave. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Block, N., and Stalnaker, Robert (1999), “Conceptual Analysis, Dualism, and the Explanatory Gap”, Conceptual Analysis, Dualism, and the Explanatory Gap 108:1–46.Google Scholar
Chalmers, D., ed. (2002), Philosophy of Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chu, T., and Glymour, C. (in press), “Semi-parametric Causal Inference for Non-linear Time Series Data”, technical report, Laboratory for Symbolic Computation, Carnegie Mellon University.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. (1970), “Mental Events”, in Foster, L. and Swanson, J. (eds.), Experience and Theory. New York: Humanities Press, 79–101.Google Scholar
Hanson, S. J., et al. (2006), “Bottom-Up and Top-Down Brain Pathways Underlying Comprehension of Everyday Visual Action”, working paper, Rutgers University Conference on fMRI.Google Scholar
Hanson, S. J. (2007), “Bottom-Up and Top-Down Brain Functional Connectivity Underlying Comprehension of Everyday Visual Action”, Journal of Brain Function and Structure, submitted.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, R., and Kandel, E. (1984), “Is There a Cell-Biological Alphabet for Simple Forms of Learning?”, Is There a Cell-Biological Alphabet for Simple Forms of Learning? 91:375–391.Google Scholar
Haxby, J., et al. (2006), “Distributed Patterns of Activity in fMRI Data: What Do They Reveal about Neural Representations?”, working paper, Rutgers University Conference on fMRI.Google Scholar
Heil, J., ed. (2004), Philosophy of Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, C. (1991), Sensations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kandel, E., and Hawkins, R. (1992), “The Biological Basis of Learning and Individuality”, The Biological Basis of Learning and Individuality 267:78–86.Google ScholarPubMed
Kiebel, S., et al. (2006), “Dynamic Causal Modeling for fMRI: Extending the Generative Model”, working paper, Rutgers University Conference on fMRI.Google Scholar
Kim, J. (1993), Supervenience and Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. (1998), Mind in a Physical World. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. (2005), Physicalism, or Something Near Enough. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kripke, S. A. (1980), Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Libet, B. (2004), Mind Time: The Temporal Factor in Consciousness (Perspectives in Cognitive Neuroscience). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, B. (2001), “In Defense of New Wave Materialism: A Response to Horgan and Tienson”, in Gillett, C. and Loewer, B. (eds.), Physicalism and Its Discontents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 319–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, T., et al. (2003), “Classifying Instantaneous Cognitive States from fMRI Data”, American Medical Informatics Association Annual Symposium, 465–469.Google Scholar
Nagel, T. (1974), “What Is It Like to Be a Bat?”, What Is It Like to Be a Bat? 83:435–450.Google Scholar
Pearl, J. (1988), Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
Poldrack, R., et al. (2006), “How Can Neuroimaging Relate Cognitive and Neural Processes?”, working paper, Rutgers University Conference on fMRI.Google Scholar
Scheines, R., and Spirtes, P. (2002), “Causal Inference of Ambiguous Manipulations”, Proceedings of the 18th Annual Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/view/confandvol/200204.html.Google Scholar
Smuts, J. (1973), Holism and Evolution. Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar
Steinbach, M., et al. (2003), “Discovery of Climate Indices Using Clustering”, Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suppes, P., et al. (1997), “Brain-Wave Recognition of Words”, Brain-Wave Recognition of Words 94:14965–14969.Google Scholar
Suppes, P. (1998), “Brain-Wave Recognition of Sentences”, Brain-Wave Recognition of Sentences 95:15861–15866.Google ScholarPubMed
Suppes, P. (1999), “Invariance between Subjects of Brain Wave Representations of Language”, Invariance between Subjects of Brain Wave Representations of Language 96:12953–12958.Google ScholarPubMed
Suppes, P., and Han, B. (2000), “Brain-Wave Representation of Words by Superposition of a Few Sine Waves”, Brain-Wave Representation of Words by Superposition of a Few Sine Waves 97:8738–8743.Google ScholarPubMed
Wegner, D. (2003), The Illusion of Conscious Will. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Woodward, J. (2003), Making Things Happen. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar