Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-15T00:54:33.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Wolgast on Innocence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2009

E. Vaughan Thomas
E. Vaughan Thomas
Affiliation:
Bangor, Gwynedd
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy , Volume 69 , Issue 268 , April 1994 , pp. 234 - 239
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Elizabeth, Wolgast, ‘Innocence’, Philosophy 68, No. 265, (July 1993), 305. Hereafter page numbers are cited in brackets in the text.Google Scholar

2 Georges Bernanos, Journal d′un cure de campagne. Quotations are taken from the English edition entitled The Diary of a Country Priest, translated by Pamela Morris (London: Fontana, 1956).

3 I am not claiming that metaphysics should necessarily be seen as unconnected with all forms of virtue found in religious life that emphasises renouncing the self. Some Wittgensteinians make the mistake of holding that a right appreciation of self-renunciation involves a recognition of its logical incompatibility with any possible form of metaphysics. I criticize this assumption in my papers ‘D. Z. Phillips and Religious Belief as Perspective on Life’, Scottish Journal of Religious Studies 14, No. 2 (Autumn 1993), and ‘Phillips, D. Z., Self-Renunciation and the Finality of Death’, Religious Studies 28, No.4, (December 1992).Google Scholar