No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Those who still interest themselves in problems connected with God, Freedom, and Immortality are not accustomed to look to natural science for any light on these dark places. It is usually admitted that the scientific method operates with basic assumptions which are far from binding on philosophers, and which indeed have no very satisfactory metaphysical authority. In spite of a few protests by philosophers, scientific thinkers have on the whole felt entitled to neglect the philosophical consequences of their theories, and have gone ahead in the investigation of nature by accepting only such hypotheses as explained the maximum number of known facts, irrespective of their possible results on other fields of work. When a strictly scientific theory is invested with philosophical importance, some form of materialism, however well disguised, usually results.
page 30 note 1 Wittgenstein, L., Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, 4.112.Google Scholar
page 30 note 2 Schlick, M., Proceedings of the Seventh International Philosophical Congress, 1930.Google Scholar
page 31 note 1 Inge, W. R., Science, Religion and Reality, 1925, p. 357.Google Scholar
page 32 note 1 Jeans, J., The Universe Around Us, p. 331.Google Scholar
page 33 note 1 Santayana, G., Poems, 1922, p. 77.Google Scholar
page 34 note 1 See Boycott, A. E., Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., 1928, 22. 55.Google Scholar
page 34 note 2 one µ is one-thousandth part of one millimetre.
page 35 note 1 Peters, R. A., Trans. Faraday Soc., 1930.Google Scholar
page 35 note 2 Lillie, R. S., “Physical Indeterminism and Vital Action,” Science, 1927, 66.139.Google Scholar
page 35 note 3 Donnan, F. G., Journ. Gen. Physiol., 1926, 8. 685.Google Scholar
page 37 note 1 Jennings, H. S., The Biological Basis of Human Nature, Faber & Faber, 1930.Google Scholar
page 38 note 1 Graaf, R. De, De Mulierum Organis Generationi, Leyden, 1672.Google Scholar
page 38 note 2 Leeuwenhoek, A. Von, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., 1677,12. 1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
page 38 note 3 D'aumont, M., article “Generation” in Diderot's Encyclopœdia, 1757, vol.7.Google Scholar
page 38 note 4 Cooke, J., New Theory of Generation, London, 1762.Google Scholar
page 40 note 1 Henderson, L. J., The Fitness of the Environment, Macmillan, 1913.Google Scholar
page 41 note 1 See Stephenson, M., Bacterial Metabolism, Longmans Green, 1930.Google Scholar