Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:34:33.229Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is it True What She Says About Tarski?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2009

Karl Popper
Karl Popper
Affiliation:
Penn, Buckinghamshire
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In a paper ‘Is it True What They Say About Tarski?’, Dr Susan Haack explicitly denies the truth of an implicit assertion of mine, by writing ‘… Tarski does not present his theory as a correspondence theory’. My reply is to quote two brief passages from Tarski's work.

Type
Articles
Information
Philosophy , Volume 54 , Issue 207 , January 1979 , pp. 98
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Philosophy 51 (1976), 323–336.Google Scholar

2 Haack refers to my Conjectures and Refutations (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1963, 1976), 224, 225–226Google Scholar. I assert there, on p. 223, that Tarski ‘rehabilitated the correspondence theory of absolute or objective truth’. She does not seem to have seen my quotation on p. 116, note 33.

3 Haack, , op. cit., 324.Google Scholar

4 Tarski, A., ‘The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages’ (first presented in Polish, 1931), Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics, tr. by Woodger, J. H. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1956), 152–278Google Scholar. The quotation is from p. 153.

5 Tarski, A., ‘The Establishment of Scientific Semantics’ (first presented 1935), op. cit., 401–408. The quotation is from p. 404.Google Scholar