Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 January 2009
The purpose of Newspeak was not only to provide a medium of expression for the world-view and mental habits proper to the devotees of Ingsoc, but to make all other modes of thought impossible.
1 Orwell, G., Nineteen Eighty-Four (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1954; first published 1949), 241.Google Scholar
2 Orwell, , op. cit., 241f.Google Scholar A similar point was made by Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan ch. 5: ‘If a man should talk to me of “a round quadrangle”, or “accidents of bread in cheese”; or “immaterial substances”; or of a “free subject”; or “free will”; or any “free”, but free from being hindered by opposition, I should not say he were in error, but that his words were without meaning, that is to say, absurd’.
3 O'Brien speaks: Orwell, , op. cit., 213.Google Scholar
4 Orwell, , op. cit., 250.Google Scholar
5 See Tugwell, Simon, Humanity, Immortality and the Redemption of Death (London: Darton Longman & Todd, 1989).Google Scholar
6 Blackburn, S., ‘Errors and the Phenomenology of Value’, Morality and Objectivity, Honderich, T. (ed.), (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul), 1–22.Google Scholar
7 Robinson, H., Matter and Sense (Cambridge University Press, 1982), 82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8 Cupitt, D., Creation out of Nothing (London: SCM Press, 1990), 183.Google Scholar
9 Satan speaks: Milton, J., Paradise Lost 1.250–6.Google Scholar
10 History of the Peloponnesian War 3.82.Google Scholar Cf. Naipaul, V. S., Among the Believers (London: Andre Deutsch, 1981), 34Google Scholar: ‘One of the English-language magazines I bought was… The Message of Peace, and, as its title warned, it was full of rage’.
11 ‘To know and not to know, to be conscious of complete truthfulness while telling carefully constructed lies, to hold simultaneously two opinions which cancelled out…; to use logic against logic, to repudiate morality while laying claim to it…; to forget whatever was necessary to forget, then to draw it back into memory again at the moment when it was needed, and then promptly to forget it again…’; Orwell, op. cit., 31f; see also 171.
12 Orwell, , op. cit., 45f.Google Scholar ‘As the Party slogan put it: “Proles and animals are free.”’: ibid., 61.
13 See Parfit, Derek, Reasons and Persons (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984).Google Scholar
14 O'Brien speaks; Orwell, , op. cit., 212.Google Scholar
15 Orwell, , op. cit., 50.Google Scholar
16 O'Brien speaks: Orwell, , op. cit., 215.Google Scholar
17 Frost speaks: Lewis, C. S., That Hideous Strength (London: Bodley Head, 1945), 318f.Google Scholar Lewis's story deals with the (miraculously thwarted) attempt to establish a society very much like Orwell's world, and makes much clearer than Orwell's story does how ordinarily sinful people could come to accept the establishment of Hell-on-earth.
18 Lewis, , op. cit., 411.Google Scholar
19 Orwell, , op. cit., 159.Google Scholar
20 O'Brien speaks: ibid., 214.
21 O'Brien speaks: ibid., 197: see also, after Winston's psychological destruction, 238.
22 Orwell, , op. cit., 68.Google Scholar
23 Orwell, , op. cit., 52.Google Scholar
24 Orwell, , op. cit., 184.Google Scholar
25 Cf. Orwell, , op. cit., 28 & 102.Google Scholar
26 O'Brien speaks, in the Ministry of Love: Orwell, , op. cit., 204.Google Scholar
27 Ibid., 208.
28 Orwell, , op. cit., 51.Google Scholar
29 Orwell, , op. cit., 216.Google Scholar
30 ‘“Always there will be the intoxication of power, constantly increasing and constantly growing subtler. Always at every moment, there will be the thrill of victory, the sensation of trampling on an enemy who is helpless”’; O'Brien speaks, Orwell, , op. cit., 215.Google Scholar
31 Orwell, , op. cit., 233.Google Scholar
32 Orwell, , op. cit., 102.Google Scholar
33 Orwell, , op. cit., 176.Google Scholar
34 Orwell, , op. cit., 215.Google Scholar The same prophecy was made by Wickson, in London's, JackThe Iron Heel (Moscow & Leningrad: Cooperative Publishing Society of Foreign Workers in the USSR, 1934; first published 1907), 94f.Google Scholar London's future history is very like Orwell's: what Orwell realized was that the organization of Revolutionary Fighting Groups (ibid., 220ff.) that permeates the organization of the Iron Heel would actually serve the Heel's purposes, and that Socialism itself would serve as the overt ideology of the oppressors (as the Foreign Workers Press so lamentably failed to see). P. Vaillant-Couturier's complacent praise, in the introduction to the Foreign Workers' edition, of the USSR as ‘a revolutionary people that nothing can vanquish because it is armed with a correct doctrine, applied in a consistent manner by a disciplined Party, with the enlightened and enthusiastic support of the masses’ is a reminder that Orwell did not have to invent Ingsoc.
35 Orwell, , op. cit., 176.Google Scholar
36 Orwell, ibid.
37 Orwell, , op. cit., 86.Google Scholar
38 Rorty, R., Consequences of Pragmatism (Minneapolis: University of Min nesota Press, 1982), xlii.Google Scholar See Stout, J., Ethics since Babel (Cambridge: James Clarke & Co:, 1990), 257.Google Scholar Stout goes on to say, contra Rorty, that he and ‘the example of every remaining virtuous person, as well as whatever exemplary lives we can keep alive in memory’ can still Condemn the torturer (ibid., 259). But that is to miss Orwell's point.
39 Orwell, , op. cit., 23, 86, 184, 196.Google Scholar
40 Orwell, , op. cit., 227f.Google Scholar
41 Stout, , op. cit., 257 (my italics).Google Scholar
42 Gabriel Gale speaks: Chesterton, G. K., The Poet and the Lunatics (London: Darwen Finlayson, 1962; 1st ed. 1949), 91f.Google Scholar
43 Orwell, , op. cit., 239.Google Scholar
44 Buchan, J., ‘Stocks and Stones’ (1911), The Moon Endureth (London: Nelson, 1923; 2nd edn), 161.Google Scholar
45 Yeats, W. B., Collected Poems (London: Macmillan, 1950), 37.Google Scholar
46 Buchan, , op. cit., 162.Google Scholar
47 Naipaul, , op. cit., 354.Google Scholar
48 Goldstein's, Book: Orwell, , op. cit., 167.Google Scholar Big Brother's face, by the way, is ‘black-haired, black-moustachio'd, full of power and mysterious calm, and so vast that it almost filled up the screen’: ibid., 16.
49 Winston meditates: Orwell, , op. cit., 223.Google Scholar See also O'Brien: ibid., 200: ‘reality is not external. Reality exists in the mind of the Party, which is collective and immortal’.
50 See my ‘Cupitt and Divine Imagining’: Modern Theology 5, 1988, 45–60.Google Scholar
51 Chesterton, , op. cit., 92f.Google Scholar
52 Orwell, , op. cit., 68.Google Scholar The preceding sentence (‘They [the Party intellectuals] were wrong and he was right!’) echoes the Chanson de Roland: ‘Paiens ont tort. Chrétiens ont droit!’
53 Chesterton, G. K., ‘Ballad of the White Horse’: Collected Poems London: Methuen, 1950, 12th edn), 233.Google Scholar
54 Contrast Sartre, J.-P., Nausea (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1965)Google Scholar and Murdoch, I., The Sovereignty of Good (Cambridge University Press, 1967), 41.Google Scholar
55 Chesterton, G. K., The Napoleon of Notting Hill (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1946; first published 1904), 154.Google Scholar
56 Chesterton, ibid., 156f.
57 Chesterton, , Notting Hill, op. cit., 64.Google Scholar
58 Chesterton, Collected Poems, op. cit., 268.Google Scholar
59 Orwell, , op. cit., 23.Google Scholar
60 Orwell, , op. cit., 185.Google Scholar
61 Chesterton, , Collected Poems, op. cit., 312.Google Scholar
62 Ibid., 345.
63 Augustine, , De Libero Arbitrio 2.13.35Google Scholar: The Teacher, The Free Choice of the Will & Grace and Free Will, tr. Russell, R. P. (Washington: Catholic University of America Press, 1968), 144.Google Scholar
64 Augustine, , Confessions 10.8, tr. Matthew, T., Huddleston, R. (ed.) (London: Burns & Oates, 1923), 286.Google Scholar
65 Raine, Kathleen, The Inner Journey of the Poet (London: Allen & Unwin, 1982), 57.Google Scholar