Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:08:27.537Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Philosophical Retreat to the Here and Now: Notes on Living in Time

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2022

Richard Moran
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The ordinary human concerns with the past and the future can be seen both as forms of suffering (anxiety toward the future, regret toward the past, etc.) and as illusory because they involve the failure to appreciate the primary reality of the present. In this lecture I argue that while there are certainly ways of being occupied with past or future times that we have reason to criticize, such criticism cannot base itself on any metaphysical claim to the singular or exclusive reality of the present. The task of developing useful forms of describing and assessing the different ways we can go wrong in temporalizing our lives is hindered rather than helped by the suggestion that our concerns with the past and with the future are as such forms of attachment to the Unreal.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy , Volume 97 , Issue 4 , October 2022 , pp. 413 - 433
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Royal Institute of Philosophy

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This lecture was given at the Royal Institute of Philosophy annual lecture, Cardiff University, October 18, 2021. I am grateful for comments from Sophie Archer, Scott Howard, Todd May, Jennifer Whiting, Matt Boyle, Ronald de Sousa, Nick Riggle, and David Zapero-Maier.

References

Bittner, Rüdiger, ‘Is it Reasonable to Regret Things One Did?’ The Journal of Philosophy 89 (1992) 262–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, John Martin, ‘The Problem of Now’, Aeon, (8 January, 2021) https://aeon.co/essays/the-metaphysical-claims-behind-the-injunction-to-be-in-the-nowGoogle Scholar
Ford, Ford Madox, The Good Soldier, (Vintage Books, 1951 [1927]).Google Scholar
Hägglund, Martin, This Life: Secular Faith and Spiritual Freedom (Pantheon Books, 2019).Google Scholar
Howard, Scott, ‘Lyrical Emotions and Sentimentality’, Philosophical Quarterly 62 (2012) 546-68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kierkegaard, Soren, Either / Or: Part II, translated and edited by Hong, Howard V. and Hong, Edna H. (Princeton, 1987)Google Scholar
Mamet, David, Glengarry Glen Ross (Grove Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Marušić, Berislav, ‘Do Reasons Expire? – An Essay on Grief’. Philosophers’ Imprint 18 (2018) 1–21.Google Scholar
Marušić, Berislav, On the Temporality of Emotions: An Essay on Grief, Anger, and Love (Oxford, 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Na'aman, Oded, ‘The Rationality of Emotional Change: Toward a Process View’ Noûs 55 (2021) 245–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parfit, Derek, Reasons and Persons (Clarendon, Oxford 1984).Google Scholar
Pascal, Blaise, Pensées, translated by Krailsheimer, A. J. (Penguin, 1966)Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur, Essays and Aphorisms, translated by Hollingdale, R. J. (Penguin, 1970).Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard, ‘Moral Luck’, in his Moral Luck (Cambridge, 1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar