Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:31:17.278Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Theory of Punishment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2009

W. A. Miller
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Khartoum, Sudan

Extract

The Object of this paper is the development of a view of punishment which incorporates what is of importance in retributive and utilitarian justifications of the practice of punishment. This proposed theory was noted and referred to as the plene esse, but not fully worked out, in the course of a discussion paper (‘Mr Quinton on “an odd sort of right”’) in which my concern was to offer an alternative view, to that of Mr Anthony Quinton, by construing ‘the right to punishment’ as meaning that ‘the offender has the right to be regarded as responsible for his actions’.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Miller, W. A., ‘Mr. Quinten on “an odd sort of right”’, Philosophy, XLI (07 1966).Google Scholar

2 Hart, H. L. A., Law, Liberty and Morality (London, O.U.P., 1966), p. 65.Google Scholar

3 Eysenck, H. J., Fact and Fiction in Psychology (Penguin Books, 1965), p. 258.Google Scholar

4 Skinner, B. F., Science and Human Behaviour (New York, Macmillan, 1963), pp. 183–5.Google Scholar

5 Benn, S. I. and Peters, R. S., Social Principles and the Democratic State (London, Allen and Unwin, 1959), p. 174.Google Scholar

6 Maurois, Andre, The Quest for Proust translated by Hopkins, Gerard (London, Jonathan Cape, 1950), p. 336.Google Scholar