Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-30T13:52:19.304Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Jonathan Barnesand Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel(eds.) (2022). Prosodic theory and practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Pp. ix + 453.

Review products

Jonathan Barnesand Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel(eds.) (2022). Prosodic theory and practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Pp. ix + 453.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 May 2023

Kristine M. Yu Open the ORCID record for Kristine M. Yu [Opens in a new window]
Kristine M. Yu*
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of Massachusetts Amherst, 01003, United States E-mail: krisyu@linguist.umass.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review
Information
Phonology , Volume 39 , Issue 2 , May 2022 , pp. 377 - 384
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahn, Byron, Veilleux, Nanette, Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stefanie & Brugos, Alejna (2021). PoLaR annotation guidelines (version 1.0). Posted on OSF at https://osf.io/usbx5/.Google Scholar
Arvaniti, Amalia & Ladd, D. Robert (2009). Greek wh-questions and the phonology of intonation. Phonology 26. 43–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckman, M. & Pierrehumbert, J. (1986). Intonational structure in Japanese and English. Phonology Yearbook 3. 255–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckman, Mary E., Hirschberg, Julia & Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stefanie (2005). The original ToBI system and the evolution of the ToBI framework. In Jun, Sun-Ah (ed.) Prosodic typology: the phonology of intonation and phrasing. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 9–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browman, Catherine P. & Goldstein, Louis (1987). Tiers in articulatory phonology, with some implications for casual speech. Haskins Laboratories Status Report on Speech Research SR-92. 1–30.Google Scholar
Fujisaki, Hiroya & Hirose, Keikichi (1984). Analysis of voice fundamental frequency contours for declarative sentences of Japanese. Journal of the Acoustical Society of Japan (E) 5. 233–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grabe, Esther, Nolan, Francis & Farrar, Kimberley J. (1998). IVie: a comparative transcription system for intonational variation in English. In The 5th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. ISCA, paper 0099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gussenhoven, Carlos (1984). On the grammar and semantics of sentence accents. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gussenhoven, Carlos (2015). Does phonological prominence exist? Lingue e linguaggio 14. 7–24.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, Carlos (2016). Analysis of intonation: the case of MAE_ToBI. Laboratory Phonology 7. 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirst, Daniel & Di Cristo, Albert (eds.) (1998). Intonation systems: a survey of twenty languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jun, Sun-Ah & Fletcher, Janet (2014). Methodology of studying intonation: from data collection to data analysis. In Jun, Sun-Ah (ed.) Prosodic typology II: the phonology and phonetics of intonation and phrasing, chapter 16. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 493–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohler, K. J. (1991). Prosody in speech synthesis: the interplay between basic research and TTS application. JPh 19. 121–138.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert (1983). Phonological features of intonational peaks. Lg 59. 721–759.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert (1995). ‘Linear’ and ‘overlay’ descriptions: an autosegmental-metrical middle way. In Elenius, Kjell & Branderud, Peter (eds.) Proceedings ICPhS 95 Stockholm, volume 2. 116–123.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet & Hirschberg, Julia (1990). The meaning of intonational contours in the interpretation of discourse. In Cohen, P., Morgan, J. & Pollack, M. (eds.) Intentions in communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 271–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J. B. (1980). The phonology and phonetics of English intonation. PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Xu, Yi (2005). Speech melody as articulatorily implemented communicative functions. Speech Communication 46. 220–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, Kristine M. (To appear). Samoan intonation and challenges for autosegmental-metrical theory. In Jun, Sun-Ah & Khan, Sameer ud Dowla (eds.) Prosodic typology III. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar