Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Oflazer, Kemal
and
Inkelas, Sharon
2006.
The architecture and the implementation of a finite state pronunciation lexicon for Turkish.
Computer Speech & Language,
Vol. 20,
Issue. 1,
p.
80.
SCHIERING, RENÉ
BICKEL, BALTHASAR
and
HILDEBRANDT, KRISTINE A.
2010.
The prosodic word is not universal, but emergent.
Journal of Linguistics,
Vol. 46,
Issue. 3,
p.
657.
Finley, Sara
2010.
Exceptions in vowel harmony are local.
Lingua,
Vol. 120,
Issue. 6,
p.
1549.
Aydemir, Tugrul
and
Yilmaz, Asim Egemen
2010.
A software library for determination of the stress position in Turkish verb inflection.
p.
696.
Kabak, Barıs¸
and
Vogel, Irene
2011.
Expecting the Unexpected: Exceptions in Grammar.
p.
59.
2011.
The Handbook of Phonological Theory.
p.
779.
Uslu, Ibrahim Baran
and
Ilk, Hakki Gokhan
2012.
A rule based perceptual intonation model for Turkish text-to-speech synthesis.
p.
1.
van der Hulst, Harry
2012.
Deconstructing stress.
Lingua,
Vol. 122,
Issue. 13,
p.
1494.
Domahs, Ulrike
Genc, Safiye
Knaus, Johannes
Wiese, Richard
and
Kabak, Barış
2013.
Processing (un-)predictable word stress: ERP evidence from Turkish.
Language and Cognitive Processes,
Vol. 28,
Issue. 3,
p.
335.
Özçelik, Öner
2014.
Prosodic faithfulness to foot edges: the case of Turkish stress.
Phonology,
Vol. 31,
Issue. 2,
p.
229.
Domahs, Ulrike
Knaus, Johannes A.
El Shanawany, Heba
and
Wiese, Richard
2014.
The role of predictability and structure in word stress processing: an ERP study on Cairene Arabic and a cross-linguistic comparison.
Frontiers in Psychology,
Vol. 5,
Issue. ,
Güneş, Güliz
2014.
Constraints on syntax-prosody correspondence: The case of clausal and subclausal parentheticals in Turkish.
Lingua,
Vol. 150,
Issue. ,
p.
278.
van der Hulst, Harry
2014.
Word Stress.
p.
3.
Göksel, Aslı
2015.
Phrasal compounds in Turkish: Distinguishing citations from quotations.
STUF - Language Typology and Universals,
Vol. 68,
Issue. 3,
p.
359.
Roncaglia-Denissen, M Paula
Schmidt-Kassow, Maren
Heine, Angela
and
Kotz, Sonja A
2015.
On the impact of L2 speech rhythm on syntactic ambiguity resolution.
Second Language Research,
Vol. 31,
Issue. 2,
p.
157.
Özçelik, Öner
2016.
Second Language Acquisition of Turkish.
Vol. 59,
Issue. ,
p.
19.
Roncaglia-Denissen, M. Paula
Roor, Drikus A.
Chen, Ao
and
Sadakata, Makiko
2016.
The Enhanced Musical Rhythmic Perception in Second Language Learners.
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience,
Vol. 10,
Issue. ,
Zora, Hatice
Heldner, Mattias
and
Schwarz, Iris-Corinna
2016.
Perceptual Correlates of Turkish Word Stress and Their Contribution to Automatic Lexical Access: Evidence from Early ERP Components.
Frontiers in Neuroscience,
Vol. 10,
Issue. ,
van Rijswijk, Remy
Muntendam, Antje
and
Dijkstra, Ton
2017.
Focus marking in Dutch by heritage speakers of Turkish and Dutch L1 speakers.
Journal of Phonetics,
Vol. 61,
Issue. ,
p.
48.
Dinçtopal Deniz, Nazik
and
Fodor, Janet Dean
2017.
Phrase Lengths and the Perceived Informativeness of Prosodic Cues in Turkish.
Language and Speech,
Vol. 60,
Issue. 4,
p.
505.