Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:38:05.563Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

In vivo haploid induction potential of Himalayan maize (Zea mays) and cogon grass (Imperata cylindrica) gene pools in different segregational cycles of intra and inter-generic crosses of wheat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 January 2022

Chandan Kapoor Open the ORCID record for Chandan Kapoor [Opens in a new window] ,
Harinder Kumar Chaudhary Open the ORCID record for Harinder Kumar Chaudhary [Opens in a new window] ,
Parul Sharma ,
Ashima Relan ,
N. V. Manoj ,
Kritika Singh  and
Vinod Kumar Sood
Chandan Kapoor*
Affiliation:
Division of Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Pusa, New Delhi-110012, India
Harinder Kumar Chaudhary
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Improvement, Molecular Cytogenetics and Tissue Culture Laboratory, CSK-Himachal Pradesh Agricultural University, Palampur, Himachal Pradesh-176062, India
Parul Sharma
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Improvement, Molecular Cytogenetics and Tissue Culture Laboratory, CSK-Himachal Pradesh Agricultural University, Palampur, Himachal Pradesh-176062, India
Ashima Relan
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Improvement, Molecular Cytogenetics and Tissue Culture Laboratory, CSK-Himachal Pradesh Agricultural University, Palampur, Himachal Pradesh-176062, India
N. V. Manoj
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Improvement, Molecular Cytogenetics and Tissue Culture Laboratory, CSK-Himachal Pradesh Agricultural University, Palampur, Himachal Pradesh-176062, India
Kritika Singh
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Improvement, Molecular Cytogenetics and Tissue Culture Laboratory, CSK-Himachal Pradesh Agricultural University, Palampur, Himachal Pradesh-176062, India
Vinod Kumar Sood
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Improvement, Molecular Cytogenetics and Tissue Culture Laboratory, CSK-Himachal Pradesh Agricultural University, Palampur, Himachal Pradesh-176062, India
*
Author for correspondence: Chandan Kapoor, E-mail: chandannaarm@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Maize and Imperata cylindrica have been utilized globally as a pollen source for induction of haploids in wheat through chromosome elimination technique. Pollen parents with a higher haploid induction rate are desired for recovering the high frequency of haploids in wheat and related species. The present investigation was carried out with the aim to assess haploid induction efficiency of diverse germplasm of maize and I. cylindrica in different generations of intra and intergeneric crosses of hexaploid and tetraploid wheat and triticale-wheat derivatives. Crosses of twenty-six lines (female) with each of two I. cylindrica and twenty-one maize genotypes (testers) were evaluated for four haploid induction parameters viz., pseudoseed formation frequency (PFF), embryo formation frequency (EFF), haploid regeneration frequency (HRF) and haploid formation frequency (HFF). I. cylindrica outperformed maize in haploid induction rate with a frequency of embryos formed with I. cylindrica (18.39%) were significantly higher as compared to maize (4.08%). In the case of I. cylindrica genotype Ic-ye identified best with mean EFF of 30.55, 14.48 and 25.43% for hexaploids, tetraploids and triticale × wheat derivatives, respectively whereas in the case of maize genotype HPMC-60 performed best with EFF of 12.61% for hexaploids, HPMC-58 (12.58%) for tetraploids and HPMC-16 for triticale × wheat derivatives with EFF of 8.91%. I. cylindrica genotype Ic-ye and maize genotypes HPMC-14, HPMC-53, HPMC-60, HPMC-64 with significantly positive GCA for haploid induction parameters may be utilized as efficient pollen parents for recovering higher frequency of haploids in wheat.

Keywords

Doubled haploidshaploidImperata cylindricawide hybridization
Type
Research Article
Information
Plant Genetic Resources , Volume 19 , Issue 6 , December 2021 , pp. 522 - 529
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of NIAB

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ammar, K, Mergoum, M and Rajaram, S (2004) The history and evolution of triticale. In Mergoum, M and Gomez-Macpherson, H (eds), Triticale Improvement and Production. Rome: FAO, pp. 1–9.Google Scholar
Badiyal, A, Chaudhary, HK, Jamwal, NS, Hussain, W, Mahato, A and Bhatt, AK (2014) Interactive genotypic influence of triticale and wheat on their crossability and haploid induction under varied agro-climatic regimes. Cereal Research Communications 42, 700–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badiyal, A, Chaudhary, HK, Jamwal, NS and Hussain, (2016) Comparative assessment of different auxin analogues on haploid induction in triticale × wheat-derived backcross generations. Agricultural Research Journal 53, 157–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bains, NS, Mangat, GS, Singh, K and Nanda, GS (1998) A simple technique for the identification of embryo carrying seeds from wheat × maize crosses prior to dissection. Plant Breeding 117, 191–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaudhary, HK (2008a) Dynamics of wheat × Imperata cylindrica- a new chromosome elimination mediated system for efficient haploid induction in wheat. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Wheat Genetics Symposium (R Appels, R Eastwood, E Lagudah, P Langridge, M Mackay, L McIntyre, P Sharp eds.), University of Sydney Press, Australia, pp. 647–650.Google Scholar
Chaudhary, HK (2008b) Dynamics of doubled haploidy breeding and molecular cytogenetic approaches in bread wheat. . In Taniguchi, K and Zhang, X (eds), Advances in Chromosome Science, Focus on Northwest Himalayan regions, vol. 3. Hiroshima, Japan: The Society of Chromosome Research, pp. 67–69.Google Scholar
Chaudhary, HK (2013) New frontiers in chromosome elimination-mediated doubled haploidy breeding for accelerated and high precision genetic upgradation in wheat. In: Plant and animal genome meeting in the international triticeae mapping initiative workshop, Cornell University, USA.Google Scholar
Chaudhary, HK, Singh, S and Sethi, GS (2002) Interactive influence of wheat and maize genotypes on haploid induction in winter × spring wheat hybrids. Journal of Genetics and Breeding 56, 259–266.Google Scholar
Chaudhary, HK, Sethi, GS, Singh, S, Partap, A and Sharma, S (2005) Efficient haploid induction in wheat by using pollen of Imperata cylindrica. Plant Breeding 124, 96–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaudhary, HK, Mahato, A, Kaila, V and Rather, SA (2015) Dihaploid induction in tetraploid durum wheat (Triticum durum L.) using pollen of Imperata cylindrica. Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 51, 142–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennett, AL, Cooper, KV and Trethowan, RM (2013) The genotypic and phenotypic interaction of wheat and rye storage proteins in primary triticale. Euphytica 194, 235–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DePauw, RM, Knox, RE, Mccaig, TN, Clarke, FR and Clarke, JM (2011) Carberry hard red spring wheat. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 91, 529–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhiman, R, Rana, V and Chaudhary, HK (2012) Himalayan maize-potential pollen source for maize mediated system of chromosome elimination approach in DH breeding of bread wheat. Cereal Research Communications 40, 246–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomez, KA and Gomez, AA (1984) Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research, 2nd Edn. New York: John Wiley & Sons, p. 680.Google Scholar
Graf, RJ, Beres, BL, Laroche, A, Gaudet, DA, Eudes, F, Pandeya, RS, Badea, A and Randhawa, HS (2013) Emerson hard red winter wheat. Canadian Journal of Plant Sciences 93, 741–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hao, M, Luo, J, Zhang, L, Yuan, Z, Yang, Y, Wu, M, Chen, W, Zheng, Y, Zhang, H and Liu, D (2013) Production of hexaploid triticale by a synthetic hexaploid wheat-rye hybrid method. Euphytica 193, 347–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ho, KM and Jones, GE (1980) Mingo barley. Canadian Journal of Plant Sciences 60, 279–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inagaki, MN and Mujeeb-Kazi, A (1995) Comparison of polyhaploid production frequencies in crosses of hexaploid wheat with maize, pearl millet and sorghum. Breeding Science 45, 57–161.Google Scholar
Inagaki, MN and Tahir, M (1990) Comparison of haploid production frequencies in wheat varieties crossed with Hordeum bulbosum L. and maize. Japanese Journal of Breeding 40, 209–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inagaki, MN and Tahir, M (1992) Production of haploid wheat through intergeneric crosses. Hereditas 116, 117–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaila, V (2013) Tagging of the specific genome and chromosome(s) of hexaploid wheat triggering chromosome elimination in wheat × Imperata cylindrica system of doubled haploidy breeding (Ph.D Thesis). CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya Palampur, India.Google Scholar
Kapoor, C, Chaudhary, HK, Relan, A, Manoj, NV, Singh, K and Sharma, P (2020) Haploid induction efficiency of diverse Himalayan maize (Zea mays) and cogon grass (Imperata cylindrica) gene pools in hexaploid and tetraploid wheats and triticale following chromosome elimination - mediated approach of doubled haploidy breeding. Cereal Research Communications 48, 539–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempthorne, O (1957) An Introduction to Genetic Statistics. Ames: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Khan, H, Bhardwaj, SC, Gangwar, OP, Prasad, P and Rathore, R (2017) Efficiency of doubled haploid production in wheat through wide hybridization and embryo rescue. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 77, 428–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kishore, N, Chaudhary, HK, Chahota, RK, Kumar, V, Sood, SP, Jeberson, S and Tayeng, T (2011) Relative efficiency of the maize and Imperata cylindrica-mediated chromosome elimination approaches for induction of haploids of wheat-rye derivatives. Plant Breeding 130, 192–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kour, A, Bhatt, U, Grewal, S, Singh, NK and Khanna, VK (2008) Effect of wheat and maize genotypes for wheat haploid production in wheat × maize crosses. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 68, 201–203.Google Scholar
Laurie, DA and Bennett, MD (1986) Wheat × maize hybridization. Canadian Journal of Genetics and Cytology 28, 313–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laurie, DA and Bennett, MD (1988) The production of haploid wheat plants from wheat × maize crosses. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 76, 393–397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mahato, A and Chaudhary, HK (2015) Relative efficiency of maize and Imperata cylindrica for haploid induction in Triticum durum following chromosome elimination-mediated approach of doubled haploid breeding. Plant Breeding 134, 379–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mukai, Y, Okamoto, G, Kiryu, S and Yamamoto, M (2015) The D-genome plays an important role in the formation of haploid Aegilops tauschii through Imperata cylindrica mediated uniparental chromosome elimination. The Nucleus 58, 199–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DePauwMurashige, T and Skoog, S (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiologia Plantarum 15, 473–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niu, Z, Jiang, , Hammad, WA Oladzadabbasabsdi, , Xu, SS Mergoum, M and Elias, EM (2014) Review of doubled haploid production in durum and common through wheat × maize hybridization. Plant Breeding 133, 313–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oettler, G, Tams, SH, Utz, HF, Bauer, E and Melchinger, AE (2005) Prospects for hybrid breeding in winter triticale I. Heterosis and combining ability for agronomic traits in European elite germplasm. Crop Science 45, 1476–1482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padmanabhan, S, Zhang, P, Hare Ray, P, Sutherland Mark, W and Martin, A (2017) Pentaploid wheat hybrids: applications, characteristics and challenges. Frontiers in Plant Sciences 8, 358.Google Scholar
Patial, M, Pal, D, Thakur, A, Bana, RS and Patial, S (2017) Doubled haploidy techniques in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.): an overview. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India, Section B: Biological Sciences 89, 27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratap, A, Sethi, GS and Chaudhary, HK (2005) Relative efficiency of different gramineae genera for haploid induction in triticale and triticale × wheat hybrids through the chromosome elimination technique. Plant Breeding 124, 147–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rather, SA, Chaudhary, HK and Kaila, V (2014) Influence of different wheats and Imperata cylindrica backgrounds on haploid induction efficiency in wheat doubled haploid breeding. Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 50, 195–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santra, M, Wang, H, Scifert, S and Haley, S (2017) Doubled haploid laboratory protocol for wheat using wheat-maize wide hybridization. Methods in Molecular Biology 1679, 235–249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sãulescu, NN, Ittu, G, Giura, A, Mustãţea, P and Ittu, M (2012) Results of using Zea method for doubled haploid production in wheat breeding at NARDI fundulea. Romanian Agricultural Research 29, 3–8.Google Scholar
Scheeren, PL, da Rosa Caetano, V, Caierao, E, Silva, MS, do Nascimento, JA, Eichelberger, L, Miranda de, MZ and Brammer, SP (2014) BSR 328-doubled haploid bread wheat cultivar. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology 14, 65–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, N, Behl, RK and Punia, MS (2005) Effect of genotypic background on haploid production through embryo rescue in wheat × maize crosses. Plant Soil Environment 51, 193–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snedecor, GW and Cochran, WG (1989) Statistical Methods, 8th Edn. Ames, USA: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Verma, V, Bains, NS, Mangat, GS, Nanda, GS, Gosal, SS and Singh, K (1999) Maize genotypes show striking differences for induction and regeneration of haploid wheat embryos in the wheat × maize system. Crop Science 39, 1722–1727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, J, Friebe, B, Raupp, WJ, Harrison, SA and Gill, BS (1996) Wheat embryogenesis and haploid production in wheat × maize hybrids. Euphytica 90, 315–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Kapoor et al. supplementary material

Table S4

Download Kapoor et al. supplementary material(File)
File 14.2 KB