Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T19:58:59.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Latitudinal patterns of diversity in the world collection of pearl millet landraces at the ICRISAT genebank

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 August 2013

H. D. Upadhyaya ,
K. N. Reddy ,
Sube Singh ,
C. L. L. Gowda ,
Mohd Irshad Ahmed  and
Senthil Ramachandran
H. D. Upadhyaya*
Affiliation:
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Genebank, Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh502 324, India
K. N. Reddy
Affiliation:
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Genebank, Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh502 324, India
Sube Singh
Affiliation:
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Genebank, Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh502 324, India
C. L. L. Gowda
Affiliation:
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Genebank, Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh502 324, India
Mohd Irshad Ahmed
Affiliation:
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Genebank, Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh502 324, India
Senthil Ramachandran
Affiliation:
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Genebank, Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh502 324, India
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: h.upadhyaya@cgiar.org
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The genebank at ICRISAT, Patancheru, India conserves a total of 19,063 pearl millet landraces from latitudes ranging from 33.00° in the Southern Hemisphere (SH) to 34.37° in the Northern Hemisphere (NH). In the present study, the NH was found to be the major region for growing pearl millet landraces (80.5%). More landraces were found at lower latitudes ( < 20°) in both hemispheres than at higher latitudes. The latitude range of 10°–15° in the NH and 15°–20° in the SH were found to be important source regions for the prevalence of pearl millet, with 39.6% and 13.1% in the world collection of landraces, respectively. Landraces from lower-latitude regions on either side of the equator varied widely for all traits. Landraces from the 5°–10°N latitude region flowered late and grew tall in the rainy and post-rainy seasons and produced more tillers. Landraces from the 10°–15°N latitude region produced few tillers and had long and thick panicles with larger seeds. Long-bristled bird-resistant landraces were considerable at latitudes of 10°–15°S and 20°–25°S. The minimum temperature at the collection sites was found to be one of the important factors for determining the patterns of the prevalence of pearl millet across the latitudes. Late-maturing, tall and high-tillering landraces from lower-latitude regions were better sources for fodder production. Early-maturing landraces producing long and thick panicles with large seeds from mid-latitude regions (15°–20°) in both hemispheres were useful for developing high-yielding cultivars. Using the latitudinal patterns of diversity in pearl millet landraces, missions may be launched to explore high-diversity, under-collected and threatened areas for the collection of materials of interest at latitudes of 15°–20°.

Keywords

climatecollectiondiversityhemispherelandraceslatitude
Type
Research Article
Information
Plant Genetic Resources , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , April 2014 , pp. 91 - 102
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aizen, MA and Woodcock, H (1992) Latitudinal trends in a corn size in eastern North American species of Wuercus. Canadian Journal of Botany 70: 1218–1222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, DJ and Anand Kumar, K (1992) Pearl millet for food and forage. Advances in Agronomy 48: 89–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashraf, M and Hafeez, M (2004) Thermotolerance of pearl millet and maize at early growth stages: growth and nutrient relations. Biologia Plantarum 48: 81–86.Google Scholar
Berry, JA and Raison, K (1981) Responses of macrophytes to temperature. In: Lange, OL, Nobel, PS, Osmond, CB and Ziegler, H (eds) Physiological Plant Ecology I. Responses to the Physical Environment. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 277–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bidinger, FR and Rai, KN (1989) Photoperiodic response of paternal lines and F1 hybrids in pearl millet. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 49: 257–264.Google Scholar
Burton, GW and Powell, JB (1968) Pearl millet breeding and cytogenetics. Advances in Agronomy 20: 50–69.Google Scholar
Chapin, FSIII and Chapin, MC (1981) Ecotypic differentiation of growth processes in Carex aquatilis along latitudinal and local gradients. Ecology 62: 1000–1009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darlington, PJ (1959) Area, climate and evolution. Evolution 13: 488–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erskine, W, Ellis, RH, Summerfield, RS, Roberts, EH and Hussain, A (1990) Characterization of responses to temperature and photoperiod for time to flowering in a world lentil collection. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 80: 193–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, AG (1960) Latitudinal variation on organic diversity. Evolution 14: 64–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellmers, H and Burton, GW (1972) Photoperiod and temperature manipulation induces early flowering in pearl millet. Crop Science 12: 198–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hijmans Robert, J, Guarino, L and Rojas, E (2002) DIVA-GIS, version 2. A Geographic Information System for the Analysis of Biodiversity Data Manual. Lima: International Potato Center.Google Scholar
Hijmans, RJ, Cameron, SE, Parra, JL, Jones, PG and Jarvis, A (2005) Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology 25: 1965–1978. doi:10.1002/joc.1276. Available at: http://www.worldclim.org/current (accessed accessed June 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IBPGR and ICRISAT (1993) Descriptors for Pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.]. Rome/Patancheru: International Board for Plant Genetic Resources/International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, p. 43.Google Scholar
Joshi, J, Schmid, B, Caldeira, MC, Dimitrakopoulos, PG, Good, J, Harris, R, Hector, A, Huss-Danell, K, Jumpponen, A, Minns, A, Mulder, CPH, Pereira, JS, Prinz, A, Scherer-Lorenzen, M, Siamantziouras, ASD, Terry, AC, Troumbis, AY and Lawton, JH (2001) Local adaptation enhances performance of common plant species. Ecology Letters 4: 536–544.Google Scholar
Joshi, AK, Pandya, JN, Mathukia, RK and Dangaria, CJ (2005) Initial evaluation for photosensitivity in pearl millet. Seed Research 33: 218–220.Google Scholar
Keuls, M (1952) The use of the “Studentized range” in connection with an analysis of variance. Euphytica 1: 112–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kipp, E (2007) Heat stress effects on growth and development in three ecotypes of varying latitude of Arabidopsis. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research 6: 1–14.Google Scholar
Klebesadel, LJ and Helm, D (1986) Food reserve storage, low-temperature injury, winter survival, and forage yields of Timothy in sub arctic Alaska as related to latitude of origin. Crop Science 26: 325–334.Google Scholar
Levene, H (1960) Robust tests for equality of variances. In: Olkin, I (ed.) Contributions to Probability and Statistics: Essays in Honor of Harold Hotelling. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 278–292.Google Scholar
McIntyre, BD, Flower, DJ and Riba, SJ (1993) Temperature and soil water status effects on radiation use and growth of pearl millet in a semi-arid environment. Agriculture and Forest Meteorology 66: 211–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MS EncartaR Interactive World Atlas, (2000) 1995–1999 Microsoft Corporation. Redmond, WA: One Microsoft Way, pp. 98052–106399.Google Scholar
Newman, D (1939) The distribution of range in samples from a normal population expressed in terms of an independent estimate of standard deviation. Biometrika 31: 20–30.Google Scholar
Ong, CK (1983) Response to temperature in a stand of pearl millet (Pennisetum typhoides S & H): II. Reproductive development. Journal of Experimental Botany 34: 337–348.Google Scholar
Ong, CK and Everard, A (1979) Short day induction of flowering in pearl millet (Pennisetum typhoides) and its effect on plant morphology. Experimental Agriculture 15: 401–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, CJ and Coaldrake, PD (1983) Pennisetum americanum as a grain crop in eastern Australia. Field Crops Research 7: 265–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, KN, Kameshwara Rao, N and Irshad Ahmed, M (2004) Geographical patterns of diversity in pearl millet germplasm from Yemen. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 51: 513–517.Google Scholar
Rick, CM (1973) Potential genetic resources in tomato species. Clues from observations in native habitats. In: Srb, A (ed.) Genes Enzymes and Populations. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 255–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santamaria, L (2003) Why are most aquatic plants broadly distributed? Dispersal, clonal growth and small-scale heterogeneity in a stressful environment. Acta Oecologica 23: 137–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shannon, CE and Weaver, W (1949) The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Springer, YP (2007) Clinal resistance structure and pathogen local adaptation in a serpentine flax–flax rust interaction. Evolution 61: 1812–1822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streisfeld, MA and Kohn, JR (2005) Contrasting patterns of floral and molecular variation across a cline in Mimulus aurantiacus . Evolution 59: 2548–2559.Google ScholarPubMed
Upadhyaya, HD, Reddy, KN, Gowda, CLL, Irshad Ahmed, M and Singh, Sube (2007) Agroecological patterns of diversity in pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.] germplasm from India. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources 20: 178–185.Google Scholar
Upadhyaya, HD, Reddy, KN, Irshad Ahmed, M and Gowda, CLL (2010) Identification of gaps in pearl millet germplasm from Asia conserved at the ICRISAT genebank. Plant Genetic Resources: Characterization and Utilization 8: 267–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Upadhyaya, HD, Reddy, KN, Irshad Ahmed, M, Dronavalli, Naresh and Gowda, CLL (2012) Latitudinal variation and distribution of photoperiod and temperature sensitivity for flowering in the world collection of pearl millet germplasm at ICRISAT genebank. Plant Genetic Resources: Characterization and Utilization 10: 59–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, JH (1963) Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association 58: 236–244.Google Scholar
Wareing, PF and Phillips, IDJ (1981) Growth and Differentiation in Plants. 3rd edn. Oxford: Pergamon Press, p. 353.Google Scholar
Weber, E and Schmid, B (1998) Latitudinal population differentiation in two species of Solidago (Asteraceae) introduced into Europe. American journal of Botany 85: 1110–1121.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Image

Upadhyaya Supplementary Material

Image

Download Upadhyaya Supplementary Material(Image)
Image 131.1 KB
Supplementary material: File

Upadhyaya Supplementary Material

Table

Download Upadhyaya Supplementary Material(File)
File 40.2 KB