Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T20:07:56.717Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Status, genetic diversity and gaps in sorghum germplasm from South Asia conserved at ICRISAT genebank

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2016

H. D. Upadhyaya*
Affiliation:
Genebank, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru 502 324, Telangana, India Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA The UWA Institute of Agriculture, the University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
K. N. Reddy
Affiliation:
Genebank, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru 502 324, Telangana, India
M. Vetriventhan
Affiliation:
Genebank, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru 502 324, Telangana, India
Murali Krishna Gumma
Affiliation:
Remote Sensing and GIS Unit, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru 502-324, Telangana, India
M. Irshad Ahmed
Affiliation:
Remote Sensing and GIS Unit, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru 502-324, Telangana, India
M. Thimma Reddy
Affiliation:
Genebank, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru 502 324, Telangana, India
Shailesh Kumar Singh
Affiliation:
Genebank, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru 502 324, Telangana, India
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: h.upadhyaya@cgiar.org

Abstract

The genebank at ICRISAT, India that serves as a world repository for sorghum germplasm conserves 39,234 accessions from 93 countries, including 6249 from seven South Asian countries: Afghanistan (6), Bangladesh (9), India (6101), the Maldives (10), Nepal (8), Pakistan (90) and Sri Lanka (25). A total of 5340 georeferenced accessions were used to identify gaps, and 5322 accessions that were characterized at ICRISAT were used to assess the diversity in the collection. Accessions of basic races varied widely than those of intermediate races for flowering in the postrainy season, plant height in both rainy and postrainy seasons, panicle exsertion, panicle length and width, seed size and 100 seed weight. Landraces from India were late flowering, tall and produced stout panicles and larger seeds. Landraces from Pakistan flowered early in both seasons and produced stout panicles and those from Sri Lanka were late flowering and tall in both seasons, produced more basal tillers and stout panicles. A total of 110 districts in 20 provinces of India, 13 districts in three provinces of Pakistan, three districts in Bangladesh and five districts in four provinces of Sri Lanka were identified as geographical gaps. Sorghum bicolor subsp. verticilliflorum, S. halepense and S. propinquum were identified as taxonomic gaps in the collection. Therefore, it is suggested to explore the districts identified as gaps to enrich the variability in the world collection of sorghum at ICRISAT.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acheampong, EN, Murthi, A and William, JT (1984) A World Survey of Sorghum and Millets Germplasm. Tome, Italy: International Plant Genetic Resources (IPGRI).Google Scholar
Appa Rao, S (1978) Collection of pearl millet in Rajasthan, India. Genetic Resources Progress Report 4. Patancheru, India: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT).Google Scholar
Duncan, RR, Bramel-Cox, PJ and Miller, FR (1991) Contribution of introduced sorghum germplasm to hybrid development in the USA. In: Shands, HL and Weisner, LE (eds) Use of Plant Introduction in Cultivar Development Part-1. CSSA Special Publication no. 17. Madison, WI, USA: Crop Science Society of America, pp. 69102.Google Scholar
Espinoza, L and Kelley, J (2002) Grain sorghum production handbook. In: Espinoza, L and Kelley, J (eds.) Grain Cooperative Extension Service. Arkansas, USA: University of Arkansas, pp. 174.Google Scholar
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (2009) Second Report on the State of the world's Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (draft). Rome: FAO. Available at: ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/meeting/017/ak528e.pdf Google Scholar
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (2014) Available at: http://www.fao.org Google Scholar
Frankel, OH and Hawkes, JG (1975) Crop Genetic Resources for Today and Tomorrow. International biological programme 2. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Frederiksen, RA and Duncan, RR (1982) Sorghum disease in North America. In: de Milliano, WAJ, Frederiksen, RA and Bengston, GD (ed.). Sorghum and Millets Diseases: A Second World Review. Patancheru, AP, India: ICRISAT, pp. 8588.Google Scholar
Fuller DQ (2002) Fifty years of archaeobotanical studies in India. Laying a solid foundation. In: Settar, S and Korisettar, R (eds). Indian Archaeology in Retrospect, vol. III. Archaeology and Interactive Disciplines. New Delhi, India: Indian Council of Historical Research, pp. 247364.Google Scholar
Gopal Reddy, V, Mathur, PN, Prasada Rao, KE and Mengesha, MH (1993) Rabi sorghum collection in Northern Karnataka and adjoining areas of Andhra Pradesh. Genetic Resources Progress Report 74. Patancheru, India: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT).Google Scholar
Gopal Reddy, V and Verma, VD (1996) Rabi sorghum collection in Maharashtra and adjoining areas of Karnataka. Genetic Resources Progress Report 85. Patancheru, India: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT).Google Scholar
Gumma, MK, Pyla, K, Thenkabail, P, Reddi, V, Naresh, G, Mohammed, I and Rafi, I (2014) Crop dominance mapping with IRS-P6 and MODIS 250-m time series data. Agriculture 4: 113131.Google Scholar
Gumma, MK, Thenkabail, PS and Nelson, A (2011) Mapping irrigated areas using MODIS 250 meter time-series data: a study on krishna river basin (India). Water 3: 113131.Google Scholar
IBPGR and ICRISAT (1993) Descriptors for Sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]. Rome, Italy: International Board for Plant Genetic Resources, Patancheru, India: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics.Google Scholar
Jones, PB, Beebe, SE, Tohme, J and Galwey, NW (1997) The use of geographical information systems in biodiversity exploration and conservation. Biodiversity Conservation 6: 947958.Google Scholar
Kamala, V, Mourya, M, Dwivedi, SL and Upadhyaya, HD (2014) Wild sorghums-Their potential use in crop improvement. In: Wang, Y-H, Upadhyaya, HD and Kole, C (eds) Genetics, Genomics and Breeding of Sorghum. Boca Raton, London, New York: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis group, pp. 5689.Google Scholar
Keuls, M (1952) The use of the ‘Studentized range’ in connection with an analysis of variance. Euphytica 1: 112122.Google Scholar
Lazarides, M, Hacker, JB and Andrew, MH (1991) Taxonomy, cytology and ecology of indigenous Australian sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench Andropogonae, Poaceae). Australian Systemic Botany 4: 591635.Google Scholar
Levene, H (1960) Robust tests for equality of variances. In: Olkin, I (ed.). Contributions to Probability and Statistics: Essays in Honour of Harold Hotelling. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 278292.Google Scholar
Maxted, N, Dulloo, E, Ford-Lloyd, BV, Iriodo, JM and Jarvis, A (2008) Gap analysis: a tool for complementary genetic conservation assessment. Diversity and Distributions 14: 10181030.Google Scholar
Maxted, N and Kell, SP (2009) Establishment of a Global Network for the in Situ Conservation of Crop Wild Relatives: Status and Needs. Rome, Italy: FAO Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, p. 266.Google Scholar
Mote, UN (1984) Sorghum species resistant to shoot fly. Indian Journal of Entomology 46: 241243.Google Scholar
MS EncartaR Interactive World Atlas (2000) 1995–1999 Microsoft Corporation. One Microsoft way, Redmond, WA 98052-6399.Google Scholar
NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) (2014) Available at: https://earthdata.nasa.gov/about/daacs/daac-lpdaac.Google Scholar
Newman, D (1939) The distribution of range in samples from a normal population expressed in terms of an independent estimate of standard deviation. Biometrika 31: 2030.Google Scholar
Pundir, RPS (1980) Pulse germplasm collection in Punjab state of India. 4–17 April 1980. Genetic Resources Progress Report 22. Patancheru, India: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT).Google Scholar
Ramanatha Rao, V and Rajagopal Reddy, C (1981) Collection of groundnut and pearl millet germplasm in Maharashtra, India. Oct-Nov 1981. Genetic Resources Progress Report 39. Patancheru, India: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT).Google Scholar
Remanandan, P (1983) Pigeonpea germplasm collection in Orissa, India. Jan 1983. Genetic Resources Progress Report 49. Patancheru, India: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT).Google Scholar
Shannon, CE and Weaver, W (1949) The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana: Univ. Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Smith, RD, Dickie, JB, Linington, SH, Pritchard, HW and Probert, RJ (2003) Seed Conservation: Turning Science into Practice. Kew, UK: Royal botanic gardens.Google Scholar
Snedecor, GW and Cochran, WG (1980) Statistical Methods. 7th edn. Ames: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Srinivasa Rao, P, Reddy, BVS, Nagaraj, N and Upadhyaya, HD (2014) Sorghum production for diversified uses. In: Wang, Y-H, Upadhyaya, HD and Kole, C (eds) Genetics, Genomics and Breeding of Sorghum. Boca Raton, London, New York: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, pp. 128.Google Scholar
Upadhyaya, HD and Gowda, CLL (2009a) Managing and enhancing the use of germplasm – strategies and methodologies. Technical Manual no.10. Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh, India: ICRISAT. p. 236.Google Scholar
Upadhyaya, HD, Reddy, KN, Irshad Ahmed, M and Gowda, CLL (2010) Identification of gaps in pearl millet germplasm from Asia conserved at the ICRISAT genebank. Plant Genetic Resources: Characterization and Utilization 8: 267276.Google Scholar
Upadhyaya, HD, Reddy, KN, Irshad Ahmed, M and Gowda, CLL (2012) Identification of gaps in pearl millet germplasm from East and Southern Africa conserved at the ICRISAT genebank. Plant Genetic Resources: Characterization and Utilization 10: 202213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Upadhyaya, HD, Reddy, KN, Irshad Ahmed, M, Gowda, CLL and Bettina, H (2009b) Identification of geographical gaps in the pearl millet germplasm conserved at ICRISAT genebank from West and Central Africa. Plant Genetic Resources: Characterization and Utilization 8: 4551.Google Scholar
Upadhyaya, HD, Reddy, KN, Irshad Ahmed, M, Gowda, CLL, Thimma Reddy, M and Ramachandran, S (2015) Identification of gaps in pigeonpea germplasm from East and Southern Africa conserved at the ICRISAT genebank. Indian Journal of Plant Genetic Resources 28: 180188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Upadhyaya, HD, Reddy, KN, Pundir, RPS, Singh, S, Gowda, CLL and Irshad Ahmed, M (2013) Diversity and geographical gaps in Cajanus scarabaeoides (L.) Thou. germplasm conserved at the ICRISAT genebank. Plant Genetic Resources: Characterization and Utilization 11: 314.Google Scholar
Upadhyaya, HD, Reddy, KN, Singh, S, Gowda, CLL, Irshad Ahmed, M and Kumar, V (2014) Diversity and gaps in Pennisetum glaucum subsp. monodii (Maire) Br. germplasm conserved at the ICRISAT genebank. Plant Genetic Resources: Characterization and Utilization 12: 226235.Google Scholar
USGS (United States Geological Survey) (2014) Available at: http://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/, https://lpdaac.usgs.gov/ Google Scholar
van der Maesen, (1980) Germplasm collection in Sri Lanka. Genetic Resources Progress Report 15. Patancheru, India: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT).Google Scholar
VSN International (2010) GenStat Software for Windows. Release 13.1. Hemel Hempstead, UK: VSN International Ltd.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Upadhyaya supplementary material

Tables S1-S3

Download Upadhyaya supplementary material(File)
File 25 KB