Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:41:19.930Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Unravelling the hidden inter and intra-varietal diversity of durum wheat commercial varieties used in Portugal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 May 2019

Miguel Bento ,
Sónia Gomes Pereira ,
Wanda Viegas  and
Manuela Silva Open the ORCID record for Manuela Silva [Opens in a new window]
Miguel Bento
Affiliation:
Linking Landscape, Environment, Agriculture and Food (LEAF), Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa, Tapada da Ajuda 1349-017 Lisboa, Portugal
Sónia Gomes Pereira
Affiliation:
Linking Landscape, Environment, Agriculture and Food (LEAF), Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa, Tapada da Ajuda 1349-017 Lisboa, Portugal
Wanda Viegas
Affiliation:
Linking Landscape, Environment, Agriculture and Food (LEAF), Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa, Tapada da Ajuda 1349-017 Lisboa, Portugal
Manuela Silva*
Affiliation:
Linking Landscape, Environment, Agriculture and Food (LEAF), Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa, Tapada da Ajuda 1349-017 Lisboa, Portugal
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: manuelasilva@isa.ulisboa.pt
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Assessing durum wheat genomic diversity is crucial in a changing environmental particularly in the Mediterranean region where it is largely used to produce pasta. Durum wheat varieties cultivated in Portugal and previously assessed regarding thermotolerance ability were screened for the variability of coding sequences associated with technological traits and repetitive sequences. As expected, reduced variability was observed regarding low molecular weight glutenin subunits (LMW-GS) but a specific LMW-GS allelic form associated with improved pasta-making characteristics was absent in one variety. Contrastingly, molecular markers targeting repetitive elements like microsatellites and retrotransposons – Inter Simple Sequence Repeat (ISSR) and Inter Retrotransposons Amplified Polymorphism (IRAP) – disclosed significant inter and intra-varietal diversity. This high level of polymorphism was revealed by the 20 distinct ISSR/IRAP concatenated profiles observed among the 23 individuals analysed. Interestingly, median joining networks and PCoA analysis grouped individuals of the same variety and clustered varieties accordingly with geographical origin. Globally, this work demonstrates that durum wheat breeding strategies induced selection pressure for some relevant coding sequences while maintaining high levels of genomic variability in non-coding regions enriched in repetitive sequences.

Keywords

genetic diversitygluteninsmicrosatellites and retrotransposons
Type
Short Communication
Information
Plant Genetic Resources , Volume 17 , Issue 4 , August 2019 , pp. 386 - 389
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bento, M, Gustafson, JP, Viegas, W and Silva, M (2011) Size matters in Triticeae polyploids: larger genomes have higher remodeling. Genome 54: 175–183.Google Scholar
Bento, M, Pereira, SG, Viegas, W and Silva, M (2017) Durum wheat diversity for heat stress tolerance during inflorescence emergence is correlated to TdHSP101C expression in early developmental stages. PLoS ONE 12: e0190085.Google Scholar
Carvalho, A, Lima-Brito, J, Macas, B and Guedes-Pinto, H (2008) Genetic variability analysis of a collection of old Portuguese bread wheat using ISSRs. Options Méditerranéennes Series A 81: 35–38.Google Scholar
Carvalho, A, Lima-Brito, J, Macas, B and Guedes-Pinto, H (2009) Genetic diversity and variation among botanical varieties of Old Portuguese wheat cultivars revealed by ISSR assays. Biochemical Genetics 47: 276–294.Google Scholar
Carvalho, A, Guedes-Pinto, H and Lima-Brito, JE (2012) Genetic diversity in Old Portuguese durum wheat cultivars assessed by retrotransposon-based markers. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 30: 578–589.Google Scholar
De Vita, P, Nicosia, OL, Nigro, F, Platani, C, Riefolo, C, Di Fonzo, N and Cattivelli, L (2007) Breeding progress in morpho-physiological, agronomical and qualitative traits of durum wheat cultivars released in Italy during the 20th century. European Journal of Agronomy 26: 39–53.Google Scholar
D'Ovidio, R (1993) Single-seed PCR of LMW glutenin genes to distinguish between durum-wheat cultivars with good and poor technological properties. Plant Molecular Biology 22: 1173–1176.Google Scholar
D'Ovidio, R and Masci, S (2004) The low-molecular-weight glutenin subunits of wheat gluten. Journal of Cereal Science 39: 321–339.Google Scholar
Henkrar, F, El-Haddoury, J, Iraqi, D, Bendaou, N and Udupa, SM (2017) Allelic variation at high-molecular weight and low-molecular weight glutenin subunit genes in Moroccan bread wheat and durum wheat cultivars. 3 Biotech 7: 287–297.Google Scholar
Kalendar, R and Schulman, AH (2006) IRAP and REMAP for retrotransposon-based genotyping and fingerprinting. Nature Protocols 1: 2478–2484.Google Scholar
Khan, MK, Pandey, A, Thomas, G, Akkaya, MS, Kayis, SA, Ozsensoy, Y, Hamurcu, M, Gezgin, S, Topal, A and Hakki, EE (2015) Genetic diversity and population structure of wheat in India and Turkey. Aob Plants 7, plv083.Google Scholar
Payne, PI, Jackson, EA and Holt, LM (1984) The association between gamma-gliadin 45 and gluten strength in durum wheat varieties: a direct causal effect or the result of genetic linkage? Journal of Cereal Science 2: 73–81.Google Scholar
Pujar, S, Tamhankar, SA, Gupta, VS, Rao, VS and Ranjekar, PK (2002) Diversity analysis of Indian tetraploid wheat using intersimple sequence repeat markers reveals their superiority over random amplified polymorphic DNA markers. Biochemical Genetics 40: 63–69.Google Scholar
Rohlf, FJ (2000) NTSYS-pc: numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system, version 2.1.Google Scholar
Shirnasabian, S, Etminan, A, Mohammadi, R and Shooshtari, L (2014) Molecular variation of improved durum wheat genotypes based on inter-simple sequence repeats fingerprinting. International Journal of Biosciences 5: 222–228.Google Scholar
Sissons, MJ (2008) Role of durum wheat composition on the quality of pasta and bread. Food 2: 75–90.Google Scholar
Smykal, P (2006) Development of an efficient retrotransposon-based fingerprinting method for rapid pea variety identification. Journal of Applied Genetics 47: 221–230.Google Scholar
Subira, J, Pena, RJ, Alvaro, F, Ammar, K, Ramdani, A and Royo, C (2014) Breeding progress in the pasta-making quality of durum wheat cultivars released in Italy and Spain during the 20th century. Crop & Pasture Science 65: 16–26.Google Scholar
Tomás, D, Dias, AL, Silva, M, Oliveira, HR, Suso, MJ, Viegas, W and Veloso, MM (2016a) Genetic diversity assessment of Portuguese cultivated Vicia faba L. through IRAP markers. Diversity 8: 8–19.Google Scholar
Tomás, D, Rodrigues, J, Varela, A, Veloso, MM, Viegas, W and Silva, M (2016b) Use of repetitive sequences for molecular and cytogenetic characterization of Avena species from Portugal. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 17: 203–217.Google Scholar
Zamanianfard, Z, Etminan, A, Mohammadi, R and Shooshtari, L (2015) Evaluation of molecular diversity of durum wheat genotypes using ISSR markers. Biological Forum 7: 214–218.Google Scholar
Zhang, XF, Liu, DC, Yang, WL, Liu, KF, Sun, JZ, Guo, XL, Li, YW, Wang, DW, Ling, HQ and Zhang, AM (2011) Development of a new marker system for identifying the complex members of the low-molecular-weight glutenin subunit gene family in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 122: 1503–1516.Google Scholar
Zietkiewicz, E, Rafalski, A and Labuda, D (1994) Genome fingerprinting by simple sequence repeat (SSR)-anchored polymerase chain reaction amplification. Genomics 20: 176–183.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Bento et al. supplementary material

Tables S1-S4 and Figure S1

Download Bento et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 2.2 MB