Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T08:51:20.957Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Urban backyards as a new model of pineapple germplasm conservation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2018

Ronilze Leite da Silva
Affiliation:
Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana (UEFS), Feira de Santana, Bahia, Brazil Programa de Bolsas Capes-Embrapa (CAPES), Brazil
Everton Hilo de Souza
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia (UFRB), Cruz das Almas, Bahia, Brazil Programa de Bolsas Capes-Embrapa (CAPES), Brazil
Carlos Alberto da Silva Ledo
Affiliation:
Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura (CNPMF), Cruz das Almas, Bahia, Brazil
Claudinéia Regina Pelacani
Affiliation:
Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana (UEFS), Feira de Santana, Bahia, Brazil
Fernanda V. Duarte Souza*
Affiliation:
Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura (CNPMF), Cruz das Almas, Bahia, Brazil
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: fernanda.souza@embrapa.br

Abstract

The conservation of pineapple in urban backyards is an innovative strategy that aims to involve city residents. A program of this nature requires careful planning and monitoring because of the involvement of people who do not have technical knowledge. This paper reports the implementation and evaluation of 30 gardens in urban backyards in Cabaceiras do Paraguaçú, Bahia, Brazil, to establish the parameters to allow creating a model for pineapple germplasm conservation cells with the collaboration of urban residents. A questionnaire was applied in two steps to people interested in participating, from which it was possible to choose and evaluate a general profile of the participants. Thirty pineapple accessions from the Active Germplasm Bank (AGB) of the Embrapa were selected for testing in the gardens. Two production cycles were considered, during which quantitative and qualitative traits of the plants and fruits were evaluated. The data were compared with the characteristics of the same accessions in the Pineapple AGB and were analysed by mixed principal component analysis. With respect to adequate maintenance, 20 gardens were well cared for until the end of the assessments, five were reasonably well tended and five were lost, due to home remodelling or lack of care by the guardians. Despite the loss of the five gardens, no accession was totally lost, thanks to the experimental design with three plants of each accession in three different gardens. The plants preserved in the gardens did not differ from those maintained by the AGB, demonstrating the effectiveness of this conservation strategy.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akinnifesi, FK, Sileshi, GW, Ajayi, OC, Akinnifesi, AI, Moura, EG, Linhares, JFP and Rodrigues, I (2010) Biodiversity of the urban homegardens of São Luís city, Northeastern Brazil. Urban Ecosystems 13: 129146. doi: 10.1007/s11252-009-0108-9.Google Scholar
Alves, E and Marra, RA (2009) Persistente migração urbana-rural. Revista de Política Agrícola 18: 518.Google Scholar
Bailey, A, Eyzaguirre, P and Maggioni, L (2009) Crop genetic resources in European home gardens. Proceedings of a workshop, 3-4 October 2007, Ljubliana, Slovenia. Bioversity International, Rome, Italy. Available at https://www.bioversityinternational.org/fileadmin/user_upload/online_library/publications/pdfs/1348.pdf. (accessed 20 March 2014).Google Scholar
Carvalho, PCL, Filho, WDSS, Ritzinger, R and Carvalho, JAB (2001) Conservation of germplasm of tropical fruits with the farmer's participation. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura 23: 730734. doi: 10.1590/S0100-29452001000300058.Google Scholar
Chavent, M, Kuentz, V, Labenne, A, Liquet, B and Saracco, J (2017). PCAmixdata: Multivariate Analysis of Mixed Data. R package version 3.1.Google Scholar
ECPGR (2017) ECPGR Concept for on-Farm Conservation and Management of Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. Rome, Italy: European Cooperative Programme for Plant Genetic Resources.Google Scholar
IBGE - Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (2010). Cidade de Cruz das Almas, Bahia. Available at http://www.cidades.ibge.gov.br/xtras/perfil.php?lang=&codmun=290980. (accessed 20 ago 2017).Google Scholar
Matos, AP, Sanches, NF and Souza, LFS (2010) Manual de Identificação de Pragas, Doenças E Deficiências Nutricionais na Cultura do Abacaxi. Cruz das Almas: Embrapa.Google Scholar
Negri, V (2012a) Policies supportive of on-farm conservation and their impact on custodian farmers in Italy. In: Padulosi, S, Bergamini, N, Lawrence, T (eds) On-farm Conservation of Neglected and Underutilized species: Status, Trends and Novel Approaches to cope with Climate Change. Rome, Italy: Bioversity International, pp. 211216.Google Scholar
Negri, V, Fasoula, D, Heinonen, M, Musayev, M, Spataro, G, Veteläinen, M and Vögel, R (2012b) European on-farm conservation activities: an update from six countries. In: Maxted, N, Dulloo, ME, Ford-Lloyd, BV, Frese, L, Iriondo, J, Carvalho, MAAP (eds) Agrobiodiversity Conservation: Securing the Diversity of Crop Wild Relatives and Landraces. Oxfordshire, UK: CABI International, pp. 327332.Google Scholar
RCS (2009) Hawaii Backyard Conservation: Ideas for every homeowner. Natural Resources Conservation Service, Second Edition, 2009. Available at http://www.opala.org/solid_waste/pdfs/Hawaii_Backyard_Conservation.pdf. (accessed 12 January 2014).Google Scholar
Reinhardt, DH, Souza, LFS, Matos, AP, Sanches, NF, Cabral, JRS, Cunha, GAP and Souza, JS (1998) Recomendações técnicas para a cultura do abacaxi, em condições de sequeiro, na região de Coração de Maria, Bahia. Cruz das Almas: Embrapa Cassava and Fruits.Google Scholar
Sena Neto, AR, Araujo, MA, Barboza, RMP, Fonseca, AS, Tonoli, GH, Souza, FVD, Mattoso, LHC and Marconcini, JM (2015) Comparative study of 12 pineapple leaf fiber varieties for use as mechanical reinforcement in polymer composites. Industrial Crops and Products 64: 6878. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.10.042.Google Scholar
Silva, RL, Ferreira, CF, Ledo, CAS, Souza, EH, Silva, PH, Carvalho, CMAP and Souza, FVD (2016) Viability and genetic stability of pineapple germplasm after 10 years of in vitro conservation. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 127: 123133. doi: 10.1007/s11240-016-1035-0.Google Scholar
Souza, CPF, Ferreira, CF, Souza, EH, Sena Neto, AR, Marconcini, JM, Ledo, CAS and Souza, FVD (2017) Genetic diversity and ISSR marker association with the quality of pineapple fiber for use in industry. Industrial Crops and Products 104: 263268. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.04.059.Google Scholar
Souza, EH, Souza, FVD, Costa, MAPC, Costa, DS Jr, Santos-Serejo, JA, Amorim, EP and Ledo, CAS (2012) Genetic variation of the Ananas genus with ornamental potential. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 59: 13571376. doi: 10.1007/s10722-011-9763-9.Google Scholar
Souza, FVD, Cabral, JRS, Souza, EH, Santos, OSN, Santos-Serejo, JA and Ferreira, FR (2007) Caracterização morfológica de abacaxizeiros ornamentais. Magistra 19: 319325.Google Scholar
Souza, FVD, Kaya, E, Jesus, VL, Souza, EH, Oliveira, AVB, Skogerboe, D, Matsumoto, T, Alves, AAC, Ledo, CAS and Jenderek, MM (2015) Droplet-vitrification and morphohistological studies of cryopreserved shoot tips of cultivated and wild pineapple genotypes. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 124: 351360. doi: 10.1007/s11240-015-0899-8.Google Scholar
USDA (1998) Backyard Conservation: Bringing conservation from the countryside to your backyard. https://conservationtools.org/library_items/522-Backyard-Conservation-Bringing-Conservation-From-the-Countryside-to-Your-Backyard. (accessed 12 January 2014).Google Scholar
Veteläinen, M, Negri, V and Maxted, N (2009) European Landraces: On-Farm Conservation Management and use. Rome, Italy: Bioversity International.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Silva et al. supplementary material 1

Supplementary Table

Download Silva et al. supplementary material 1(File)
File 487.4 KB