Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T08:34:11.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Écriture Aesthetics: Mapping the Literate Episteme of Visual Narrative

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Sheila J. Nayar
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The norms of art-cinema narration—evident in the work of such directors as Ingmar Bergman, Satyajit Ray, and François Truffaut—reflect noetic processes and expectations engendered by a culture of the written word. Such norms are absent from Hindi popular films, which have been historically contoured by the psychodynamics of orally based thought and by devices and motifs common to oral storytelling. By funneling art-cinema narration's norms—already meticulously (and impartially) cataloged by David Bordwell—through the prism of orality and through the orally inflected characteristics of Hindi popular films and by conjointly engaging with literary theory concerned with issues of textuality, this essay develops a novel conceptual matrix for understanding the epistemic pressures that weigh on visual storytelling as both a spectatorial and a generative act.

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 123 , Issue 1 , January 2008 , pp. 140 - 155
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 by The Modern Language Association of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Dudley, Andrew. Film in the Aura of Art. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1984.Google Scholar
Roland, Barthes. The Pleasure of the Text. New York: Farrar, 1975.Google Scholar
Bazin, André. “From What Is Cinema?” Film Theory and Criticism. Ed. Braudy, Leo and Cohen, Marshall. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1999. 195–211.Google Scholar
Bazin, André. What Is Cinema? Trans. Hugh Gray. Vol. 1. Berkeley: U of California P, 1967.Google Scholar
Ronald, Bogue. Deleuze on Cinema. New York: Routledge, 2003.Google Scholar
David, Bordwell. Narration in the Fiction Film. Madison: U of Wisconsin P, 1985.Google Scholar
Pierre, Bourdieu. “Outline of a Sociological Theory of Art Perception.” International Social Science Journal 20 (1968): 589–612.Google Scholar
Carroll, Noël. Mystifying Movies: Fads and Fallacies in Contemporary Film Theory. New York: Columbia UP, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Noël. A Philosophy of Mass Art. Oxford: Clarendon, 1998.Google Scholar
Joyce, Coleman. Public Reading and the Reading Public in Late Medieval England and France. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1996.Google Scholar
Jonathan, Culler. Structuralist Poetics: Structuralism, Linguistics, and the Study of Literature. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1975.Google Scholar
Gilles, Deleuze. The Movement-Image. Trans. Hugh Tomlinson and Barbara Habberjam. Vol. 1 of Cinema. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1986.Google Scholar
Gilles, Deleuze. The Time-Image. Trans. Hugh Tomlinson and Robert Galeta. Vol. 2 of Cinema. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1989.Google Scholar
Dwyer, Rachel, and Patel, Divia. Cinema India: The Visual Culture of Hindi Film. New Brunswick: Rutgers UP, 2002.Google Scholar
Antony, Easthope. Literary into Cultural Studies. London: Routledge, 1991.Google Scholar
Elizabeth, Eisenstein. The Printing Press as an Agent of Change: Communications and Cultural Transformations in Early Modern Europe. 2 vols. New York: Cambridge UP, 1979.Google Scholar
Marilyn, Fabe. Closely Watched Films: An Introduction to the Art. Berkeley: U of California P, 2004.Google Scholar
Ruth, Finnegan. Literacy and Orality: Studies in the Technology of Communication. Oxford: Blackwell, 1988.Google Scholar
Foley, John Miles. How to Read an Oral Poem. Urbana: U of Illinois P, 2002.Google Scholar
Michel, Foucault. The Archaeology of Knowledge. Trans. A. M. Sheridan Smith. New York: Pantheon, 1972.Google Scholar
Michel, Foucault. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977. Ed. Gordon, Colin. Trans. Gordon, Leo Marshall, John Mepham, and Kate Soper. New York: Pantheon, 1977.Google Scholar
Cynthia, Freeland. “The Sublime in Cinema.” Passionate Views: Film, Cognition, and Emotion. Ed. Plantinga, Carl and Smith, Greg M. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1999.65–83.Google Scholar
Tejaswini, Ganti. Bollywood: A Guide Book to Popular Hindi Cinema. New York: Routledge, 2004.Google Scholar
Jack, Goody. The Domestication of the Savage Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1977.Google Scholar
Goody, Jack., ed. Literacy in Traditional Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1968.Google Scholar
Goody, Jack, and Watt, Ian. “The Consequences of Literacy.” Goody, Literacy 27–68.Google Scholar
Kathleen, Gough. “Implications of Literacy in Traditional China and India.” Goody, Literacy 70–84.Google Scholar
Graff, Harvey J. The Labyrinths of Literacy: Reflections on Literacy Past and Present. London: Falmer, 1987.Google Scholar
Tom, Gunning. “The Cinema of Attraction: Early Film, Its Spectator and the Avant-Garde.” Wide Angle 8.3–4 (1986): 63–70.Google Scholar
Eric, Havelock. Preface to Plato. Cambridge: Belknap-Harvard UP, 1963.Google Scholar
Brian, Henderson. “Toward a Non-bourgeois Camera Style.” Film Quarterly 24.2 (1970–71): 2–14.Google Scholar
Priya, Jaikumar. “Bollywood Spectaculars.” World Literature Today 77.3–4 (2003): 24–29.Google Scholar
Erich, Kahler. The Inward Turn of the Narrative. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1973.Google Scholar
Frank, Kermode. “Free Fall.” Rev. of The Presence of the Word, by Walter J. Ong. New York Review of Books 14 Mar. 1968. 10 Nov. 2006 <http://www.nybooks.com/>.Google Scholar
Langer, Judith A., ed. Language, Literacy, and Culture: Issues of Society and Schooling. Norwood: Ablex, 1987.Google Scholar
Mira, Liehm. Passion and Defiance: Film in Italy from 1942 to the Present. Berkeley: U of California P, 1984.Google Scholar
Luria, A. R. Cognitive Development: Its Cultural and Social Foundations. Trans. Martin Lopez-Morillas and Lynn Solotaroff. Ed. Michael Cole. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1976.Google Scholar
Lyotard, Jean-François. “Acinema.” Narrative, Apparatus, Ideology: A Film Theory Reader. Ed. Rosen, Philip. New York: Columbia UP, 1986. 349–59.Google Scholar
Diane, Macdonell. Theories of Discourse: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell, 1986.Google Scholar
McLuhan, Marshall. The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Man. Toronto: U of Toronto P, 1962.Google Scholar
McLuhan, Marshall. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. New York: McGraw, 1964.Google Scholar
Christian, Metz. The Imaginary Signifier: Psychoanalysis and the Cinema. Trans. Celia Britton, Annwyl Williams, Ben Brewster, and Alfred Guzzetti. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1982.Google Scholar
Christian, Metz. Language and Cinema. Trans. Donna Jean Umiker-Sebeok. The Hague: Mouton, 1974.Google Scholar
Nayar, Sheila J. “Cinematically Speaking: The Impact of Orality on Indian Popular Film.” Visual Anthropology 14 (2001): 121–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nayar, Sheila J. “Dis-orientalizing Bollywood: Incorporating Indian Popular Cinema into a Survey Film Course.” New Review of Film and Television Studies 3.1 (2005): 59–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nayar, Sheila J. “Invisible Representation: The Oral Contours of a National Popular Cinema.” Film Quarterly 57.3 (2004): 13–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richard, Neupert. A History of the French New Wave Cinema. Madison: U of Wisconsin P, 2002.Google Scholar
Nowell-Smith, Geoffrey. “Art Cinema.” The Oxford History of World Cinema. Ed. Nowell-Smith, . Oxford: Oxford UP, 1997.567–75.Google Scholar
Isidore, Okpewho. The Epic in Africa: Toward a Poetics of the Oral Performance. New York: Columbia UP, 1979.Google Scholar
Ong, Walter J. Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word. London: Routledge, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ong, Walter J. The Presence of the Word: Some Prolegomena for Cultural and Religious History. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1967.Google Scholar
Ong, Walter J. “Reading, Technology, and the Nature of Man.” The Yearbook of English Studies 10 (1980): 132–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
John, Orr. Cinema and Modernity. Cambridge, Eng.: Polity, 1993.Google Scholar
Neil, Postman. “The Humanism of Media Ecology.” Proceedings of the Media Ecology Association 1 (2000): 10–16.Google Scholar
Prasad, M. Madhava. Ideology of the Hindi Film: A Historical Construction. New Delhi: Oxford UP, 1998.Google Scholar
Rajadhyaksha, Ashish, and Willemen, Paul. Encyclopaedia of Indian Cinema. New Delhi: Oxford UP, 1999.Google Scholar
Satyajit, Ray. Our Films, Their Films. New York: Hyperion, 1994.Google Scholar
Resnick, Lauren B. Education and Learning to Think. Washington: Natl. Acad., 1987. 17 Aug. 2002 <http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=1032>.Google Scholar
Scholes, Robert, and Kellogg, Robert. The Nature of Narrative. New York: Oxford UP, 1966.Google Scholar
Paul, Schrader. Transcendental Style in Film: Ozu, Bresson, Dreyer. Berkeley: U of California P, 1972.Google Scholar
Scribner, Sylvia, and Cole, Michael. The Psychology of Literacy. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Susan, Sontag. 'Against Interpretation“ and Other Essays. New York: Farrar, 1961.Google Scholar
Janet, Staiger. Interpreting Films: Studies in the Historical Reception of American Cinema. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1992.Google Scholar
Brian, Stock. Listening for the Text: On the Uses of the Past. Philadelphia: U of Pennsylvania P, 1996.Google Scholar
Street, Brian V. Literacy in Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1984.Google Scholar
Deborah, Tannen. “The Orality of Literature and the Literacy of Conversation.” Langer 67–88.Google Scholar
UNESCO. Institute for Statistics. Nov. 2006 <http://www.uis.unesco.org>. Path: Education; Literacy..+Path:+Education;+Literacy.>Google Scholar
Ian, Watt. The Rise of the Novel: Studies in Defoe, Richardson, and Fielding. Berkeley: U of California P, 1957.Google Scholar