Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T11:15:53.938Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Performance: The Blunders of Orpheus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Joseph Roach
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Thou shalt not sit With statisticians nor commit A social science.

—W. H. Auden, Phi Beta Kappa Poem

Performance is an idea that became a field. For ideas to matter to the field of performance studies, however, they must take the form of action—a play, a rite, a dance, a game, a parade, an utterance. The action of performance may be practical or symbolic, but it is “always a doing or a thing done” (Diamond, Performance 1). In this essay, I assess the idea of performance, the field of performance studies, and their common relation to action by reopening the question of mimesis, the venerable doctrine that art imitates life. I also provide a preliminary sketch of a practical poetics of performance, defining it as Orphic (of or pertaining to the mythic figure of Orpheus). The action that the Orphic plot imitates—moving forward while glancing back—recapitulates the risky act of performance itself, for the performer typically feels the urge to look back, despite the prohibitions and costs, because performance always seems to be authorized by something prior, even when it isn't. Not restricted to dead Europeans or any other limited constituency, popular Orphism embraces all the lively arts, but it is most intensely concentrated in poetry meant to be spoken aloud, from Homer to hip-hop, and in lyric drama. “The story of Orpheus underlies every poem,” Susan Stewart writes in Poetry and the Fate of the Senses, and she might have added, “every performance”: bereft of Eurydice from the moment of his fatally forbidden turn, when he dooms her to be his inspiration, “he must attempt to fill her absence with compensatory song” (256). So Eurydice stands in for Orpheus, punished for his transgression, and he for her, making art out of her fate. Across the gulf of time and the river Styx, she prompts him, as he keeps looking back to her.

Type
Literary History, Literary Revision, Literary Performance
Information
PMLA , Volume 125 , Issue 4: Special Topic Literary Criticism for the Twenty-First Century , October 2010 , pp. 1078 - 1086
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Alexander, Jeffrey C., Bernhard Giesen, and Mast, Jason L. Social Performance: Symbolic Action, Cultural Pragmatics, and Ritual. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2006. Print.Google Scholar
Erich, Auerbach. “Figura.” Scenes from the Drama of European Literature: Six Essays. Gloucester: Smith, 1973. 11–76. Print.Google Scholar
Erich, Auerbach. Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature. 1953. Trans. Willard R. Trask. Introd. Edward W. Said. 50th anniversary ed. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2003. Print.Google Scholar
Richard, Bauman. “Performance.” International Encyclopedia of Communications. Ed. Barnouw, Erik. 4 vols. New York: Oxford UP, 1989. Print.Google Scholar
Bauman, Richard, and Briggs, Charles L. “Poetics and Performance as Critical Perspectives on Language and Social Life.” Annual Review of Anthropology 19 (1990): 59–88. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhabha, Homi K. The Location of Culture. London: Routledge, 1994. Print.Google Scholar
Marvin, Carlson. Performance: A Critical Introduction. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge, 2004. Print.Google Scholar
Elin, Diamond. Performance and Cultural Politics. New York: Routledge, 1996. Print.Google Scholar
Elin, Diamond. Unmaking Mimesis: Essays on Feminism and Theater. London: Routledge, 1997. Print.Google Scholar
Drewal, Margaret Thompson. Yoruba Ritual: Performance, Play, Agency. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1992. Print.Google Scholar
Gates, Henry Louis Jr. The Signifying Monkey: A Theory of Afro-American Literary Criticism. New York: Oxford UP, 1988. Print.Google Scholar
Martin, Harries. Forgetting Lot's Wife: On Destructive Spectatorship. New York: Fordham UP, 2007. Print.Google Scholar
Johnson, E. Patrick. Sweet Tea: Black Gay Men of the South. Chapel Hill: U of North Carolina P, 2008. Print.Google Scholar
Fred, Moten. In the Break: The Aesthetics of the Black Radical Tradition. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2003. Print.Google Scholar
Pearson, Mike, and Shanks, Michael. Theatre/Archeology. London: Routledge, 2001. Print.Google Scholar
Peggy, Phelan. “Immobile Legs, Stalled Words: Psychoanalysis and Moving Deaths.” Critical Theory and Performance. Ed. Reinelt, Janelle and Roach, Joseph. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 2007. 432–55. Print.Google Scholar
Said, Edward W. Introduction. Auerbach, Mimesis ix–xxxii.Google Scholar
Richard, Schechner. Between Theater and Anthropology. Philadelphia: U of Pennsylvania P, 1985. Print.Google Scholar
Susan, Stewart. Poetry and the Fate of the Senses. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2002. Print.Google Scholar
Michael, Taussig. Mimesis and Alterity: A Particular History of the Senses. New York: Routledge, 1993. Print.Google Scholar
Diana, Taylor. The Archive and the Repertoire: Performing Cultural Memory in the Americas. Durham: Duke UP, 2003. Print.Google Scholar
The Teacher's Bible. London: Bagster, n.d. Print. King James Vers.Google Scholar
Lesley, Wheeler. Voicing American Poetry: Sound and Performance from the 1920s to the Present. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 2008. Print.Google Scholar
Mary, Zimmerman. “The Archeology of Performance.” The Performance Studies Reader. Ed. Bial, Henry. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge, 2004. 310–19. Print.Google Scholar
Mary, Zimmerman. Metamorphoses: A Play. Evanston: Northwestern UP, 2002. Print.Google Scholar