Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:23:04.010Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Attempt to Unify All the Fine Arts and Sciences under the Concept of That Which Is Complete in Itself

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Karl Philipp Moritz  and
Elliott Schreiber
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Charting the origin of romantic aesthetics in theories of the symbol, Tzvetan Todorov points to an eighteenth-century author who remains little known outside the field of German studies: Karl Philipp Moritz (1756–93). Todorov locates the birth of the modern aesthetic of “intransitive signification” (162)—the doctrine of aesthetic autonomy, or the idea that works of art signify nothing outside themselves—in Moritz's essay “An Attempt to Unify All the Fine Arts and Sciences under the Concept of That Which Is Complete in Itself” (1785). Surprisingly, even more than a quarter century after the publication of Todorov's book in the United States, Moritz's seminal treatise is not available in a complete English translation.

Type
Criticism in Translation
Information
PMLA , Volume 127 , Issue 1 , January 2012 , pp. 94 - 100
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 by The Modern Language Association of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Auden, W. H., and Meyer, Elizabeth. Introduction. Italian Journey. By Johann Wolfgang von Goethe. Trans. Auden and Meyer. 1962. London: Penguin, 1970. 7–19. Print.Google Scholar
Costazza, Alessandro. Schönheit und Nützlichkeit: Karl Philipp Moritz und die Ästhetik des 18. Jahrhunderts. Bern: Lang, 1996. Print.Google Scholar
Gailus, Andreas. “A Case of Individuality: Karl Philipp Moritz and the Magazine for Empirical Psychology.” New German Critique 79 (2000): 67–105. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heitner, Robert R., trans. Italian Journey. By Johann Wolfgang von Goethe. Ed. Thomas P. Saine and Jeffrey L. Sammons. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1994. Print. Vol. 6 of The Collected Works. Victor Lange et al., gen. eds.Google Scholar
Hess, Jonathan. Reconstituting the Body Politic: Enlightenment, Public Culture, and the Invention of Aesthetic Autonomy. Detroit: Wayne State UP, 1999. Print.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of the Power of Judgment. Trans. Guyer, Paul and Matthews, Eric. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2001. Print.Google Scholar
Krupp, Anthony, ed. Karl Philipp Moritz: Signaturen des Denkens. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2010. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas. Theories of Distinction: Redescribing the Descriptions of Modernity. Ed. Rasch, William. Trans. O'Neil, Joseph et al. Stanford: Stanford UP, 2002. Print.Google Scholar
Marcuse, Herbert. The Aesthetic Dimension: Toward a Critique of Marxist Aesthetics. Boston: Beacon, 1978. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, Karl. The Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844. The Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844 and The Communist Manifesto. By Marx and Friedrich Engels. Trans. Martin Milligan. Amherst: Prometheus, 1988. 13–168. Print.Google Scholar
Moritz, Karl Philipp. Anton Reiser: A Psychological Novel. Trans. Robertson, Ritchie. London: Penguin, 1997. Print.Google Scholar
Moritz, Karl Philipp. Schriften zur Ästhetik und Poetik. Ed. Schrimpf, Hans Joachim. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1962. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moritz, Karl Philipp. “Versuch einer Vereinigung aller schönen Künste und Wissenschaften unter dem Begriff des in sich selbst Vollendeten.” Beiträge zur Ästhetik. Ed. Schrimpf, Hans Joachim and Adler, Hans. Mainz: Dietrich'sche, 1989. 3–9. Print.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. On the Genealogy of Morals. On the Genealogy of Morals and Ecce Homo. Trans. Walter Kaufmann and R. J. Hollingdale. New York: Vintage, 1966. 13–163. Print.Google Scholar
Purdy, Daniel. The Tyranny of Elegance: Consumer Cosmopolitanism in the Age of Goethe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1998. Print.Google Scholar
Richter, Simon. Introduction. The Literature of Weimar Classicism. Rochester: Camden, 2005. 3–44. Print. Vol. 7 of Camden House History of German Literature.Google Scholar
Schreiber, Elliott. “Towards an Aesthetics of the Sublime Augenblick: Reading Karl Philipp Moritz Reading Goethe's Die Leiden des jungen Werthers.” The Enlightened Eye: Goethe and Visual Culture. Ed. Moore, Evelyn K. and Simpson, Patricia Anne. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2007. 193–217. Print.Google Scholar
Szondi, Peter. Antike und Moderne in der Ästhetik der Goethezeit. Antike und Moderne in der Ästhetik der Goethezeit. Hegels Lehre von der Dichtung. Ed. Senta Metz and Hans-Hagen Hildebrandt. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1974. 11–265. Print. Vol. 1 of Poetik und Geschichtsphilosophie.Google Scholar
Todorov, Tvetan. Theories of the Symbol. Trans. Porter, Catherine. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1982. Print.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. “Wissenschaft als Beruf.” Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre. Ed. Winckelmann, Johannes. Tübingen: Mohr, 1988. 582–613. Print.Google Scholar
Woodmansee, Martha. The Author, Art, and the Market: Rereading the History of Aesthetics. New York: Columbia UP, 1994. Print.Google Scholar