Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T22:55:32.326Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Anzaldúa and Transnational American Studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Debra A. Castillo
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

For several years now, at least since the 2000 census, the United States has in one way or another told itself that it needs to come to terms with what it means to live in a country of over forty million Latinos/as. Latina actors grace the covers of People magazine, Latin beats percolate through the earbuds of iPods, and McDonald's serves up breakfast burritos alongside its McMuffins. In the academic world, the increasing consciousness of the Latino/a presence in the United States means that it is now unthinkable for any major university not to have a program of studies focusing on the histories and cultures of this ill-defined population; it means border theory is increasingly present on our syllabi; and it means that we all nod our heads wisely when the name “Gloria Anzaldúa” is mentioned. For years before her untimely death, Anzaldúa complained bitterly about being “repeatedly tokeni[zed]” (“Haciendo Caras” xvi), as one of the same half dozen women continually called on as a resource for academic collaboration. Being a token meant that she saw clearly how she was both overhyped and treated less than seriously; worse, she felt drained of the energy that would allow her to continue her literary and political work.

Type
Theories and Methodologies
Information
PMLA , Volume 121 , Issue 1: Special Topic: The History of the Book and the Idea of Literature , January 2006 , pp. 260 - 265
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Anzaldúa, Gloria. Borderlands / La Frontera: The New Mestiza. San Francisco: Aunt Lute, 1987.Google Scholar
Anzaldúa, Gloria. “Haciendo Caras, una Entrada.” Making Face, Making Soul. Ed. Anzaldúa, . San Francisco: Spinsters, 1990. xv–xxviii.Google Scholar
Anzaldúa, Gloria. “Now Let Us Shift … the Path of Conocimiento … Inner Work, Public Acts.” This Bridge We Call Home: Radical Visions for Transformation. Ed. Anzaldúa, and Keating, AnaLouise. New York: Routledge, 2002. 540–78.Google Scholar
Anzaldúa, Gloria, and Moraga, Cherríe, eds. This Bridge Called My Back. 2nd ed. New York: Kitchen Table, 1984.Google Scholar
Castillo-Garsow, Melissa. “In Search of a New Chicana Role Model: Remembering Gloria Anzaldúa and a Look toward the Future.” Unpublished essay, 2005.Google Scholar
Fishkin, Shelley Fisher. “Crossroads of Cultures: The Transnational Turn in American Studies–Presidential Address to the American Studies Association, November 12, 2004.” American Quarterly 57 (2005): 17–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaspar de Alba, Alicia. “Crop Circles in the Cornfield: Remembering Gloria E. Anzaldúa (1942–2004).” American Quarterly 56.3 (2004): iv–vii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, Meaghan. Too Soon Too Late: History in Popular Culture. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1998.Google Scholar
Saenz, Benjamin Alire. “In the Borderlands of Chicano Identity.” Border Theory: The Limits of Cultural Politics. Ed. Michaelson, Scott and Johnson, David E. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1997. 68–96.Google Scholar
Tabuenca Córdoba, Maríaía-Socorro. “Viewing the Border: Perspectives from ‘The Open Wound.’” Discourse 18.1–2 (1995–96): 146–68.Google Scholar
Vila, Pablo. “The Limits of American Border Theory.” Ethnography at the Border. Ed. Vila. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2003. 306–41.Google Scholar