Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T07:28:48.920Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cloud Cover: (Re)Dressing Desire and Comfortable Subversions in Caryl Churchill's Cloud Nine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

James M. Harding
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Scholars have maintained that Caryl Churchill's Cloud Nine unites Brechtian and deconstructive strategies in a dramatic form that subverts traditional representations of gender and sexuality. Yet this reception has consistently overlooked the repressive undercurrents that surface in the movement from the text of Churchill's play to a performance of it. Indeed, a fundamental disparity exists between the play's seemingly progressive textual pronouncements and the effects of its oft-celebrated dramaturgical strategies. The use of theatrical techniques like cross-casting harbors surprisingly reactionary attitudes that reinforce heterosexual imperatives by presenting homoerotic desires in conventional, stereotypical forms. Underlying these reactionary attitudes, I argue, is a liberal ideology that restricts the expression of gay male and lesbian desire to terms that reaffirm heterosexual norms. The play thus perpetuates a disturbingly naive and demonstrably repressive notion of acceptance of sexual diversity, a notion in which difference is easy to accept because it is not enacted.

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 113 , Issue 2 , March 1998 , pp. 258 - 272
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Barthes, Roland “The Death of the Author.” Image, Music, Text. New York: Farrar, 1977. 142–14.Google Scholar
Blair, Rhonda “‘Not … but’ / ‘Not-Not-Me’: Musings on Cross-Gender Performance.” Upstaging Big Daddy. Ed. Donkin, Ellen and Clement, Susan. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 1993. 291–307.Google Scholar
Carlson, Susan “Comic Collisions: Convention, Rage, and Order.” New Theatre Quarterly 12 (1987): 303–30.Google Scholar
Case, Sue-Ellen Feminism and Theatre. London: Macmillan, 1988.Google Scholar
Case, Sue-Ellen, ed Performing Feminisms. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1990.Google Scholar
Case, Sue-Ellen “Toward a Butch-Femme Aesthetic.” Hart 282–28.Google Scholar
Case, Sue-Ellen, and Forte, Jeanie K. “From Formalism to Feminism.” Theater 16.2 (1985): 62–65.Google Scholar
Churchill, Caryl Cloud Nine. Plays: One. New York: Routledge, 1985. 243–320.Google Scholar
Clum, John “The Work of Culture: Cloud Nine and Sex/Gender Theory.” Caryl Churchill: A Casebook. Ed. Randall, Phyllis R. New York: Garland, 1988. 91–116.Google Scholar
Cohn, Ruby “Modest Proposals of Modern Socialists.” Modern Drama 25 (1982): 457–45.Google Scholar
Cousin, Geraldine Churchill: The Playwright. London: Methuen, 1989.Google Scholar
de Lauretis, Teresa Alice Doesn't. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1984.Google Scholar
de Lauretis, Teresa “Sexual Indifference and Lesbian Representation.” Case. Performing 17–39.Google Scholar
Diamond, Elin “Brechtian Theory / Feminist Theory: Toward a Gestic Feminist Criticism.” TDR 32.1 (1988): 82–94.Google Scholar
Diamond, Elin “(In)Visible Bodies in Churchill's Theater.” Hart 259–25.Google Scholar
Diamond, Elin “Refusing the Romanticism of Identity: Narrative Interventions in Churchill, Benmussa, Duras.” Theatre Journal 37 (1985): 273–27.Google Scholar
Dolan, Jill “Breaking the Code: Musings on Lesbian Sexuality and the Performer.” Modern Drama 32 (1989): 146–14.Google Scholar
Dolan, Jill The Feminist Spectator as Critic. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 1988.Google Scholar
Dolan, Jill “‘Lesbian’ Subjectivity in Realism: Dragging at the Margins of Structure and Ideology.” Case, Performing 40–53.Google Scholar
Dolan, Jill “Practicing Cultural Disruptions: Gay and Lesbian Representation and Sexuality.” Critical Theory and Performance. Ed. Reinelt, Janelle and Roach, Joseph. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 1992. 263–26.Google Scholar
Fitzsimmons, Linda File on Churchill. London: Methuen, 1989.Google Scholar
Harris, Hilary “Toward a Lesbian Theory of Performance: Re-functioning Gender.” Acting Qut. Ed. Hart, Lynda and Phelan, Peggy. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 1993. 257–25.Google Scholar
Hart, Lynda, ed Making a Spectacle. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 1989.Google Scholar
Herrmann, Anne “Travesty and Transgression: Transvestism in Shakespeare, Brecht, and Churchill.” Case, Performing 294–315.Google Scholar
Keyssar, Helene Feminist Theatre. New York: Grove, 1985.Google Scholar
Kritzer, Amelia Howe The Plays of Caryl Churchill. New York: St. Martin's, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, Erik Theater at the Margins. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulvey, Laura “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema.” Contemporary Literary Criticism. 3rd ed. Fid. Robert Con Davis and Ronald Schleifer. New York: Longman. 1994. 422–42.Google Scholar
Pavis, Patrice Languages of the Stage. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1982.Google Scholar
Quigley, Austin “Stereotype and Prototype: Character in the Plays of Caryl Churchill.” Feminine Focus. Ed. Brater, Enoch. New York: Oxford UP, 1989. 25–52.Google Scholar
Reinelt, Janelle After Brecht. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 1994.Google Scholar
Reinelt, Janelle “Rethinking Brecht: Deconstruction, Feminism, and the Polities of Form.” Essays on Brecht: Brecht Yearbook 15. Ed. Silberman, Marc et al. College Park: U of Maryland, 1990. 99–107.Google Scholar
Rich, Adrienne “Compulsory Helerosexuality and Lesbian Existence.” Signs 5 (1980): 631–63.Google Scholar
Ritchie, Rob, ed The Joint Stock Book. New York: Methuen, 1987.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Marc “‘Make Us the Women We Can't Be’: Cloud Nine and the Female Imaginary.” Journal of Dramatic Theory and Criticism 8.2 (1994): 7–22.Google Scholar
Thomsen, Christian “Three Socialist Playwrights: John McGrath, Caryl Churchill. Trevor Griffiths.” Contemporary English Drama. Stratford-upon-Avon Studies 19. Ed. C. W. E. Bigsby. London: Arnold. 1981. 157–15.Google Scholar
Vanden Heuvel, Michael “Performing Gender(s).” Contemporary Literature 35 (1994): 804–80.Google Scholar
Wandor, Michelene Carry On, Understudies. New York: Routledge, 1986.Google Scholar
Wittig, Monique “The Straight Mind.” Feminist Issues 1 (1980): 103–10.Google Scholar
Worthen, W. B “Disciplines of the Text / Sites of Performance.” TDR 39.1 (1995): 13–28.Google Scholar