Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T02:10:00.252Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The “German” Origin of the Birth of Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Jane O. Newman
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

When Walter Benjamin gave his so-called baroque book its title—Ursprung Des Deutschen trauerspiels (origin of the German Tragic Drama; 1928)—he was clearly in dialogue with Nietzsche's project in Die Geburt der Tragödie (The Birth of Tragedy; 1872). Indeed, it is the difference between the traditional concept of birth (Geburt) and the Benjaminian notion of origin (Ursprung)—and thus the failure of the mourning play's origin to be a matter of its genesis (Entstehung) in ancient tragedy—that helps us see what Benjamin claims is the difference between the two genres and the way he would have us read the “historical” periods aligned with each (Newman 74). Moreover, precisely because the origin of the Trauerspiel is not a monodirectional birth for Benjamin, his commentary on the complex amalgam of ancient and medieval, Renaissance and baroque, and Lutheran and Catholic ideological forces and aesthetic forms that battle it out in the historical seventeenth-century Silesian dramas that he takes as his subject can be read both as an account of the multiple temporalities that shaped these odd plays and as a reflection on how those same forces traveled forward in time to shape the social, political, and existential concerns of his own, early-twentieth-century German modernity—which of course had helped produce his account of the early modern in the first place (Koepnick; Newman). Benjamin's famous association of his theory of Ursprung with a “Strudel… im Fluss des Werdens” (“eddy in the stream of becoming”) thus helpfully confounds the conventional directionality of Geburt by literally muddying the waters of just where the origin of any period's meaning might lie (226; my trans.).

Type
Theories and Methodologies
Information
PMLA , Volume 130 , Issue 3 , May 2015 , pp. 776 - 786
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Adelung, Johann Christoph. Versuch einer vollständigen grammatisch-kritischen Wörterbuches der hochdeutschen Mundart. 1774-86. Leipzig: Johann Gottlieb Immanuel Breitkopf, 1793-1801. Münchener Digitalisierungszentrum. Web. 6 Feb. 2015.Google Scholar
Algazi, Gadi. “Otto Brunner—‘Konkrete Ordnung’ und Sprache der Zeit.” Geschichtsschreibung als Legitimationswissenschaft, 1918-1945. Ed. Schüttler, Peter. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1997. 166–203. Print.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. Ursprung des deutschen Trauerspiels. 1928. Gesammelte Schriften. Vol. 1. Ed. Rolf Tiedemann and Hermann Schweppenhäuser. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1980. 203–430. Print.Google Scholar
Bloch, Marc. The Historian's Craft. 1941. Trans. Putnam, Peter. New York: Vintage, 1959. Print.Google Scholar
Brady, Thomas A. Jr. “German Burghers and Peasants in the Reformation and the Peasants' War: Partners or Competitors?” Between the Middle Ages and Modernity: Individual and Community in the Early Modern World. Ed. Parker, Charles H. and Bentley, Jerry H. Lanham: Rowman, 2007. 33–52. Print.Google Scholar
Braudel, Fernand. “On a Concept of Social History.” 1959. On History. Trans. Matthews, Sarah. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1980. 120–31. Print.Google Scholar
Brunner, Otto. “Conclusion of Land and Lordship: Fundamental Questions of the Constitutional History of South-east Germany in the Middle Ages.” 1939. Trans. Heidrunn Kubiessa and Vincent P. Pecora. Genre 43.1-2 (2010): 13-26. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunner, Otto. “Feudalism: The History of a Concept.” Cheyette, Lordship 32–61.Google Scholar
Brunner, Otto. “Feudalismus: Ein Beitrag zur Begriffsgeschichte.” Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur. Abhandlungen der Geistes- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Klasse 10 (1958): 591–627. Print.Google Scholar
Brunner, Otto. Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe: Historisches Lexikon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland. Ed. Conze, Werner and Koselleck, Reinhart. 8 vols. Stuttgart: Klett, 1972-97. Print.Google Scholar
Brunner, Otto. Land und Herrschaft. Grundfragen der territorialen Verfassungsgeschichte Südostdeutschlands im Mittelalter. 1939. 3rd ed. Brunn: Rohrer, 1943. Print.Google Scholar
Cheyette, Fredric L. Introduction. Cheyette, Lordship 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheyette, Fredric L., ed. Lordship and Community in Medieval Europe: Selected Readings. New York: Holt, 1968. Print.Google Scholar
Cheyette, Fredric L. “Some Reflections on Violence, Reconciliation, and the ‘Feudal Revolution.‘” Conflicts in Medieval Europe: Changing Perspectives on Society and Culture. Ed. Gorecki, Piotr and Brown, Warren C. Burlington: Ashgate, 2003. 243–64. Print.Google Scholar
Cole, Andrew. The Birth of Theory. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2014. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conrad, Sebastian. The Quest for the Lost Nation: Writing History in Germany and Japan in the American Century. 1999. Trans. Nothnagle, Alan. Berkeley: U of California P, 2010. Print.Google Scholar
Evans, R. J. W., Michael Schaich, and Peter H. Wilson, eds. The Holy Roman Empire, 1495-1806. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2011. Print.Google Scholar
Faulenbach, Bernd. Ideologie des deutschen Weges. Die Deutsche Geschichte in der Historiographie zwischen Kaiserreich und Nationalsozialismus. Munich: Beck, 1980. Print.Google Scholar
Febvre, Lucien. The Problem of Unbelief in the Sixteenth Century: The Religion of Rabelais. 1942. Trans. Gottlieb, Beatrice. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1982. Print.Google Scholar
Grimm, Jacob, and Grimm, Wilhelm. Deutsches Wörterbuch. Leipzig: Hirzel, 1852-1960. DWB. Web. 6 Feb. 2015.Google Scholar
Hegel, Hegel Georg Wilhelm. Political Writings. Ed. Dickey, Laurence Winant and Nisbet, Hugh Barr. Trans. Nisbet, . Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1999. Print.Google Scholar
Holsinger, Bruce. Neomedievalism, Neoconservatism, and the War on Terror. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm, 2007. Print.Google Scholar
Koepnick, Lutz P. “The Spectacle, the Trauerspiel, and the Politics of Resolution: Benjamin Reading the Baroque Reading Weimar.” Critical Inquiry 22.2 (1996): 268–91. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Hartmut, and van Horn Melton, James, eds. Paths of Continuity: Central European Historiography from the 1930s to the 1950s. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1994. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melton, Melton James van. “From Folk History to Structural History: Otto Brunner (1898-1982) and the Radical-Conservative Roots of German Social History.” Lehmann and Melton 263–92.Google Scholar
Melton, Melton James van. “Introduction: Continuities in German Historical Scholarship, 1933-1960.” Lehmann and Melton 1–18.Google Scholar
Miller, Peter N. “Nazis and Neo-Stoics: Otto Brunner and Gerhard Oestreich before and after the Second World War.” Past and Present 176.1 (2002): 144–86. Print.Google Scholar
Newman, Jane O. Benjamin's Library: Modernity, Nation, and the Baroque. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 2011. Print.Google Scholar
Pecora, Vincent P. “Political Theology and the Case of Otto Brunner.” Race and Political Theology. Ed. Lloyd, Vincent W. Stanford: Stanford UP, 2012. 22–53. Print.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition. 1975. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2003. Print.Google Scholar
Richter, Melvin. “Begriffsgeschichte.” 1987. Historiography: Critical Concepts in Historical Studies. Ed. Burns, Robert M. London: Routledge, 2006. 75–91. Print.Google Scholar
Sassen, Saskia. Territory, Authority, Rights: From Medieval to Global Assemblages. Updated ed. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2008. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, John H. “Hegel for the (Middle) Ages.” Telos 169 (2014): 180–83. Print.Google Scholar
Strayer, Joseph R. “Feudalism in Western Europe.” Cheyette, Lordship 12–21.Google Scholar
Weber, Wolfgang. Priester der Klio. Historischsozialwissenschaftliche Studien zur Herkunft und Karriere deutscher Historiker und zur Geschichte der Geschichtswissenschaft, 1800-1970. Frankfurt: Lang, 1984. Print.Google Scholar