Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:15:38.637Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

History and Memory: The Problem of the Archive

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Extract

It is often said that a century ago the author and the reader occupied the same space. I am told that much of modern literature is the result of a separation in that sense of space. It could also easily be said that a century ago archives and history occupied the same conceptual and methodological space. This sense of partnership in the study of the past has undergone a variety of stresses and strains over recent decades, to the point that what constitutes the archive has become a question fundamental to how our knowledge of the past is acquired and shaped. History and archives now occupy very different spaces, a condition that has conceptual, technical, and practical causes. Among the many consequences of this intellectual divide is the need for a new understanding of the archive apart from its historical roots.

Type
Letters from Librarians
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Nicholas, Dirks. Castes of Mind: Colonialism and the Making of Modern India. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2001.Google Scholar
Ham, F. Gerald. “Archival Strategies for the Post-custodial Era.” American Archivist 44 (1981): 207–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, Lynn, and Bonnell, Victoria, eds. Beyond the Cultural Turn: New Directions in Society and Culture. Berkeley: U of California P, 1999.Google Scholar
McDonald, Terrence. The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helen, Samuels. Varsity Letters: Documenting Modern Colleges and Universities. Metuchen: Scarecrow, 1992.Google Scholar
Carolyn, Steedman. Dust: The Archive and Cultural History. New Brunswick: Rutgers UP, 2002.Google Scholar