Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:31:14.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Holding On to 9/11: The Shifting Grounds of Materiality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Laura E. Tanner
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Cultural theorists interrogating the appropriation of 9/11 through nationalist, capitalist, and media forces have tended to deauthorize the general public's embodied and affective responses to that event. Instead of disavowing claims of mourning unsupported by geographic proximity or material connection, this essay situates such responses in contemporary screen culture to consider how the shifting grounds of materiality complicate the experience of bodily location at every level from the perceptual to the political. Using photographs, fiction, museum exhibits, and survivor accounts, the essay explores how the transformed relation between subjects and objects defines our apprehension of 9/11 in material, technological, and phenomenological terms. The complex dynamics of perception and embodiment unveiled through these representations suggest the need to rethink categories of experience and affect to accommodate new paradigms of proximity and connectedness increasingly liberated from the measures of geography and the borders of the body.

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 127 , Issue 1 , January 2012 , pp. 58 - 76
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 by The Modern Language Association of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Abel, Marco. “Don DeLillo's ‘In the Ruins of the Future’: Literature, Images, and the Rhetoric of Seeing 9/11.” PMLA 118.5 (2003): 1236–50. Web. 5 Mar. 2007.Google Scholar
Ahmed, Sara. “Affective Economies.” Social Text 79 (2004): 117–42. Web. 3 Apr. 2008.Google Scholar
Alexander, Jeffrey C. “From the Depths of Despair: Performance, Counterperformance, and ‘September 11.”‘ Sociological Theory 22.1 (2004): 88–105. Web. 5 May 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baudrillard, Jean. “L'esprit du terrorisme.” Hauerwas and Lentricchia 149–62.Google Scholar
Biesecker, Barbara. “No Time for Mourning: The Rhetorical Production of the Melancholic Citizen-Subject in the War on Terror.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 40.1 (2007): 147–69. Web. 15 May 2008.Google Scholar
Brown, Timothy P. “Trauma, Museums, and the Future of Pedagogy.” Third Text 18.4 (2004): 247–59. Web. 7 July 2008.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence. New York: Verso, 2006. Print.Google Scholar
Collins, Glenn. “9/11 Shrine, with the Tragic, Toxic Dust.” New York Times. New York Times, 25 Aug. 2006. Web. 14 July 2007.Google Scholar
Crary, Jonathan. “Attention and Modernity in the Nineteenth Century.” Picturing Science, Producing Art. Ed. Jones, Caroline A. and Galison, Peter. New York: Routledge, 1998. 475–500. Print.Google Scholar
DeLillo, Don. Falling Man. New York: Scribner, 2007. Print.Google Scholar
Diamond, Elin. Personal essay. Román 136–38.Google Scholar
Dolan, Jill. Personal essay. Román 106–07.Google Scholar
Engle, Karen J. “Putting Mourning to Work: Making Sense of 9/11.” Theory, Culture, and Society 24.1 (2007): 61–88. Web. 14 Apr. 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erman, Sam, and Bull, Chris, eds. At Ground Zero: Twenty-Five Stories from Young Reporters Who Were There. New York: Basic, 2002. Print.Google Scholar
Filipov, David. “Trying to Move On.” Boston Globe 11 Sept. 2008: A1+. Print.Google Scholar
Fink, Mitchell, and Mathias, Lois, eds. Never Forget: An Oral History of September 11, 2001. New York: Harper, 2002. Print.Google Scholar
Friend, David. Watching the World Change. New York: Picador, 2007. Print.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Judith, ed. Trauma at Home after 9/11. Lincoln: U of Nebraska P, 2003. Print.Google Scholar
Hansen, Mark B. N. Bodies in Code. New York: Routledge, 2006. Print.Google Scholar
Hauerwas, Stanley, and Lentricchia, Frank, eds. Dissent from the Homeland. Durham: Duke UP, 2003. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heller, Michael. “On the Mourning Field.” September 11, 2001: American Writers Respond. Ed. Heyen, William. Silver Springs: Etruscan, 2002. 173–75. Print.Google Scholar
Jameson, Fredric. “The Dialectics of Disaster.” Hauerwas and Lentricchia 55–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Josyph, Peter. Liberty Street: Encounters at Ground Zero. Hanover: UP of New England, 2006. Print.Google Scholar
Kahane, Claire. “Uncanny Sights: The Anticipation of the Abomination.” Greenberg 107–16.Google Scholar
Kandel, Randy Frances. “Narrative Reconstruction at Ground Zero.” Media Representations of September 11. Ed. Chermak, Steven et al. Westport: Praeger, 2003. 187–200. Print.Google Scholar
Kaplan, E. Ann. “A Camera and a Catastrophe.” Greenberg 95–106.Google Scholar
Keegan, William. Closure: The Untold Story of the Ground Zero Recovery Mission. New York: Touchstone, 2006. Print.Google Scholar
Knapp, Caroline. “Consciousness on Overload.” Afterwords: Stories and Reports from 9/11 and Beyond. Comp. editors of Salon.com. New York: Washington Square, 2002. 42–46. Print.Google Scholar
Kuchler, Susanne. “Technological Materiality: Beyond the Dualist Paradigm.” Theory, Culture, and Society 25.1 (2008): 101–20. Web. 14 Jan. 2009.Google Scholar
Lentricchia, Frank, and McAuliffe, Jody. “Groundzeroland.” Hauerwas and Lentricchia 95–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lutz, Catherine. “The Wars Less Known.” Hauerwas and Lentricchia 43–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marks, Laura U. The Skin of the Film. Durham: Duke UP, 2000. Print.Google Scholar
Martin, Michael. “Sight and Touch.” The Contents of Experience: Essays on Perception. Ed. Crane, Tim. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1992. 196–215. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meiselas, Susan. “Susan Meiselas.” New York September 11. By Magnum Photographers and David Halberstam. New York: Powerhouse, 2001. 22–31. Print.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. The Visible and the Invisible. Trans. Lingis, Alphonso. Ed. Lefort, Claude. Evanston: Northwestern UP, 1968. Print.Google Scholar
Moore, Rachel. Savage Theory: Cinema as Modern Magic. Durham: Duke UP, 2000. Print.Google Scholar
Munster, Anna. Materializing New Media: Embodiment in Information Aesthetics. Lebanon: Dartmouth Coll. P–UP of New England, 2006. Print.Google Scholar
Murphy, Dean. September 11: An Oral History. New York: Doubleday, 2002. Print.Google Scholar
Orbán, Katalin. “Trauma and Visuality: Art Spiegelman's Maus and In the Shadow of No Towers.” Representations 97.1 (2007): 57–89. Web. 20 Apr. 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pallasmaa, Juhani. The Eye of the Skin: Architecture and the Senses. West Sussex: Wiley, 2005. Print.Google Scholar
Paterson, Mark W. D. “Digital Touch.” The Book of Touch. Ed. Clausen, Constance. New York: Berg, 2005. 431–36. Print.Google Scholar
Paterson, Mark W. D. The Senses of Touch: Haptics, Affects, and Technologies. New York: Berg, 2007. Print.Google Scholar
Redfield, Marc. “Virtual Trauma: The Idiom of 9/11.” Diacritics 37.1 (2007): 55–80. Web. 10 Aug. 2008.Google Scholar
Román, David, ed. “A Forum on Theatre and Tragedy: A Response to September 11, 2001.” Theatre Journal 54.1 (2002): 95–138. Web. 30 Oct. 2008.Google Scholar
Schechner, Richard. “9/11 as Avant-Garde Art?” PMLA 124.5 (2009): 1820–29. Web. 11 Jan. 2010.Google Scholar
Schinkel, William. “On the Concept of Terrorism.” Contemporary Political Theory 8.2 (2009): 176–98. Web. 5 June 2010.Google Scholar
Schreiber, Cindy. “Learning to See.” Erman and Bull 166–79.Google Scholar
Singer, P. W. Wired for War: The Robotics Revolution and Conflict in the Twenty-First Century. New York: Penguin, 2009. Print.Google Scholar
Smith, Terry. The Architecture of Aftermath. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2006. Print.Google Scholar
Sobchack, Vivian. Carnal Thoughts: Embodiment and Moving Image Culture. Berkeley: U of California P, 2004. Print.Google Scholar
Spangler, Nick. “Diary of Disaster.” Erman and Bull 40–64.Google Scholar
Stafford, Barbara Maria. Echo Objects: The Cognitive Work of Images. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2007. Print.Google Scholar
Sturkin, Marita. Tourists of History: Memory, Kitsch, and Consumerism from Oklahoma City to Ground Zero. Durham: Duke UP, 2007. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thrift, Nigel. “Beyond Mediation: Three New Material Registers and Their Consequences.” Materiality. Ed. Miller, Daniel. Durham: Duke UP, 2005. 231–55. Print.Google Scholar
Wallace-Wells, Benjamin. “Creating September 12.” Erman and Bull 208–31.Google Scholar
Williams, Paul. Memorial Museums: The Global Rush to Commemorate Atrocities. New York: Berg, 2007. Print.Google Scholar
Yaeger, Patricia. “Rubble as Archive, or 9/11 as Dust, Debris, and Bodily Vanishing.” Greenberg 187–94.Google Scholar
Zelizer, Barbie. “Photography, Journalism, and Trauma.” Journalism after September 11. Ed. Zelizer, and Allan, Stuart. New York: Routledge, 2002. 48–64. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Žižek, Slavoj. “Welcome to the Desert of the Real.” Hauerwas and Lentricchia 131–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar