Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T07:53:20.274Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Homo Alphabeticus, Glottographic Exceptionalism, and the Ethnocentric Definition of Writing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 March 2022

Galen Brokaw
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Theories and Methodologies
Information
PMLA , Volume 137 , Issue 1 , January 2022 , pp. 163 - 170
Copyright
Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Modern Language Association of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Biakolo, Emevwo. “On the Theoretical Foundations of Orality and Literacy.” Research in African Literatures, vol. 30, no. 2, 1999, pp. 42–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloch, Maurice. “Literacy and Enlightenment.” Literacy and Society, edited by Schousboe, Karen and Larsen, Mogens Trolle, Akademisk Forlag, 1989, pp. 15–38.Google Scholar
Boone, Elizabeth. Stories in Red and Black: Pictorial Histories of the Aztecs and Mixtecs. U of Texas P, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brokaw, Galen. A History of the Khipu. Cambridge UP, 2010.Google Scholar
Brokaw, Galen. “Indigenous American Polygraphy and the Dialogic Model of Media.” Ethnohistory, vol 57, 2010, pp. 117–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brokaw, Galen. “An Integrational Approach to Colonial Semiosis.” The Routledge Hispanic Studies Companion to Colonial Latin America and the Caribbean (1942–1898), edited by San-Miguel, Yolanda Martínez and Arias, Santa, Routledge, 2020, pp. 99–116.Google Scholar
Daniels, Peter T. An Exploration of Writing. Equinox, 2017.Google Scholar
DeFrancis, John. Visible Speech: The Diverse Oneness of Writing Systems. U of Hawaii P, 1989.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. Of Grammatology. Translated by Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty, Johns Hopkins UP, 1974.Google Scholar
Descartes, René. Discourse on Method. Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy, translated by Donald A. Cress, Hackett, 1998, pp. 1–44.Google Scholar
Finnegan, Ruth. Literacy and Orality. Blackwell, 1988.Google Scholar
Gaur, Albertine. Literacy and the Politics of Writing. Intellect, 2000.Google Scholar
Gelb, I. J. A Study of Writing. U of Chicago P, 1952.Google Scholar
Goody, Jack. The Power of the Written Tradition. Smithsonian Institution Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Goody, Jack, and Watt, Ian. “The Consequences of Literacy.” Literacy in Traditional Societies, edited by Goody, and Watt, Cambridge UP, 1968, pp. 27–68.Google Scholar
Guillory, John. “The Genesis of the Media Concept.” Critical Inquiry, vol. 36, 2010, pp. 321–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, Godfrey. The Myth of American Exceptionalism. Yale UP, 2009.Google Scholar
Lyotard, Jean-François. The Differend: Phrases in Dispute. Translated by Van Den Abbeele, Georges, U of Minneapolis P, 1989.Google Scholar
McDowell, Paula. The Invention of the Oral: Print Commerce and Fugitive Voices in Eighteenth-Century Britain. U of Chicago P, 2016.Google Scholar
Mignolo, Walter. The Darker Side of the Renaissance: Literacy, Territoriality, and Colonization. U of Michigan P, 1995.Google Scholar
Mignolo, Walter. Local Histories / Global Designs: Coloniality, Subaltern Knowledges, and Border Thinking. Princeton UP, 2012.Google Scholar
Ong, Walter. Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word. Routledge, 1988.Google Scholar
Sachs, Jeffrey D. A New Foreign Policy: Beyond American Exceptionalism. Columbia UP, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Street, Brian. “Orality and Literacy as Ideological Constructions: Some Problems in Cross-Cultural Studies.” Culture and History, vol. 2, 1987, pp. 7–30.Google Scholar
Whittaker, Gordon. Deciphering Aztec Hieroglyphs: A Guide to Nahuatl Writing. U of California P, 2021.Google Scholar