Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T01:41:59.772Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Literature as Knowledge for Living, Literary Studies as Science for Living

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Ottmar Ette
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In 2001, the official year of the “life sciences” in germany, ottmar ette began pulling together ideas for what was to become the programmatic essay excerpted and translated here. Ette is known for different things in different places: in Spain and Hispanic America, he is renowned for his work on José Martí, Jorge Semprún, Mario Vargas Llosa, Gabriel García Márquez, and a host of other authors. In the francophone world, he is best known for his writings on Roland Barthes and, more recently, on Amin Maalouf, while his reputation in his native Germany rests on his voluminous work on Alexander von Humboldt and on the new literatures in German. That this polyglot professor of Romance literatures is, at heart and in practice, a comparatist goes almost without saying. He is also, perhaps as inevitably, a literary theorist and a cultural critic, whose work has attracted attention throughout Europe. In his 2004 book ÜberLebenswissen—a title that might be rendered in English both as “Knowledge for Survival” and as “About Life Knowledge”—Ette first began to reclaim for literary studies the dual concepts of Lebenswissen and Lebenswissenschaft, which I have translated provisionally as “knowledge for living” and “science for living” to set them off from the biotechnological discourses of the life sciences. While ÜberLebenswissen focuses on the disciplinary history and practices of the field of Romance literatures, its companion volume from 2005, ZwischenWeltenSchreiben: Literaturen ohne festen Wohnsitz (“Writing between Worlds: Literatures without a Fixed Abode”), extends Ette's inquiry to the global contexts of Shoah, Cuban, and Arab American literatures. Both volumes urge that literary studies “be opened up, made accessible and relevant, to the larger society. Doing so is, simply and plainly, a matter of survival” (ZwischenWeltenSchreiben 270).

Type
Translations: Life, Language, Alterity
Information
PMLA , Volume 125 , Issue 4: Special Topic Literary Criticism for the Twenty-First Century , October 2010 , pp. 977 - 993
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Wolfgang, Adam. “Beitrag zur Debatte: Ottmar Ette, Literaturwissenschaft als Lebenswissenschaft.” Lendemains 32.126–27 (2007): 226–30. Print.Google Scholar
Emily, Apter. “Global Translatio: The ‘Invention’ of Comparative Literature, Istanbul, 1933.” Debating World Literature. Ed. Prendergast, Christopher. London: Verso, 2004. 77–109. Print.Google Scholar
Wolfgang, Asholt. “Neues Leben (in) der Literaturwissenschaft?” Lendemains 32.126–27 (2007): 220–24. Print.Google Scholar
Asholt, Wolfgang, and Ette, Ottmar, eds. Literaturwissenschaft als Lebenswissenschaft: Programm—Projekte—Perspektiven. Tübingen: Narr Francke Attempto, 2010. Print. Édition Lendemains 20.Google Scholar
Bogdal, Klaus-Michael. “Lebenskunst, nicht Lebenswissenschaft.” Lendemains 32.128 (2007): 92–97. Print.Google Scholar
Ottmar, Ette. “Literaturwissenschaft als Lebenswissenschaft: Eine Programmschrift im Jahr der Geisteswissenschaften.” Lendemains 32.125 (2007): 7–32. Print.Google Scholar
Ottmar, Ette. ZwischenWeltenSchreiben: Literaturen ohne festen Wohnsitz (ÜberLebenswissen II). Berlin: Kadmos, 2005. Print.Google Scholar
“Exzellenzinitiative.” Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung. Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, 2007. Web. 25 May 2009. <>..>Google Scholar
Gumbrecht, Hans Ulrich. “Wie könnte man nicht einverstanden sein? Bestimmter Widerspruch zu Ottmar Ette.” Lendemains 32.128 (2007): 89–92. Print.Google Scholar
Christoph, Menke. “Jenseits von Geistes- und Biowissenschaften.” Lendemains 32.126–27 (2007): 208–11. Print.Google Scholar
Markus, Messling. “Disziplinäres (Über-)Lebenswissen: Zum Sinn einer kritischen Geschichte der Philologie.” Lendemains 33.129 (2008): 102–10. Print.Google Scholar
Mignolo, Walter D. The Idea of Latin America. Oxford: Blackwell, 2005. Print.Google Scholar
Nünning, Ansgar. “Sechs Theses zu den Aufgaben und Perspektiven einer lebenswissenschaftlichen orientierten Literaturwissenschaft.” Lendemains 32.126–27 (2007): 212–19. Print.Google Scholar
Haun, Saussy, ed. Comparative Literature in an Age of Globalization. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 2006. Print.Google Scholar
Haun, Saussy, ed. “Exquisite Cadavers Stitched from Fresh Nightmares: Of Memes, Hives, and Selfish Genes.” Saussy, Comparative Literature 3–42.Google Scholar
Semprún, Jorge. “Philosophie als Überlebenswissenschaft.” Lendemains 32.28 (2007): 80–88. Print.Google Scholar
Toni, Tholen. “Die Literaturwissenschaft und das Leben: Bermerkungen anlässlich einer anhebenden Debatte im Jahr der Geisteswissenschaften.” Lendemains 32.128 (2007): 98–108. Print.Google Scholar
Theodor, Adorno. Minima Moralia: Reflections from a Damaged Life. Trans. E. F. N. Jephcott. London: New Left, 1974. Print.Google Scholar
Giorgio, Agamben. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Trans. Daniel Heller-Roazen. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1998. Print.Google Scholar
Erich, Auerbach. Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature. Trans. Willard R. Trask. 50th anniversary ed. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2003. Print.Google Scholar
Erich, Auerbach. “Philology and Weltliteratur.” Centennial Review 13.1 (1969): 1–17. Print.Google Scholar
Roland, Barthes. Comment vivre ensemble. Paris: Seuil, 2002. Print.Google Scholar
Hans, Blumenberg. Die Lesbarkeit der Welt. 1981. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1986. Print.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Cramer. Chaos and Order: The Complex Structure of Living Systems. Trans. D. I. Loewus. Weinheim: VHC, 1993. Print.Google Scholar
Daston, Lorraine, and Park, Katharine. Wonders and the Order of Nature, 1150–1750. New York: Zone, 1998. Print.Google Scholar
Ottmar, Ette. Apostel—Dichter—Revolutionär: Eine Geschichte seiner Rezeption. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1991. Print. Vol. 1 of José Martí.Google Scholar
Ottmar, Ette. “Literatur als Lebenswissen, Literaturwissenschaft als Lebenswissenschaft?” Introduction. ÜberLebenswissen: Die Aufgabe der Philologie. Berlin: Kadmos, 2004. 9–22. Print.Google Scholar
Ottmar, Ette. “Literaturwissenschaft als Lebenswissenschaft: Eine Programmschrift im Jahr der Geisteswissenschaften.” Lendemains 32.125 (2007): 7–32. Print.Google Scholar
Ottmar, Ette. ZwischenWeltenSchreiben: Literaturen ohne festen Wohnsitz (ÜberLebenswissen II). Berlin: Kadmos, 2005. Print.Google Scholar
Frühwald, Wolfgang, et al. Geisteswissenschaften heute: Eine Denkschrift. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1991. Print.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. “Über das Hören.” Über das Hören: Einem Phänomen auf der Spur. Ed. Vogel, Thomas. Tübingen: Attempto, 1996. 197–205. Print.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. The Future of Human Nature. Cambridge: Polity; Blackwell, 2003. Print.Google Scholar
Klaus, Heitmann. Der Immoralismus-Prozess gegen die französische Literatur im 19. Jahrhundert. Bad Homburg: Gehlen, 1970. Print.Google Scholar
Wolfgang, Iser. The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response. 1978. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1980. Print.Google Scholar
Wolfgang, Iser. “Die Apellstruktur der Texte: Unbestimmtheit als Wirkungsbedingung literarischer Prosa.” Rezeptionsästhetik: Theorie und Praxis. Ed. Warning, Rainer. Munich: Fink, 1975. 228–52. Print.Google Scholar
Wolfgang, Iser. “Indeterminacy and the Reader's Response in Prose Fiction.” Aspects of Narrative: Selected Papers from the English Institute. New York: Columbia UP, 1971. 1–45. Print.Google Scholar
Wolfgang, Iser. “The Reading Process: A Phenomenological Approach.” New Directions in Literary History. Ed. Cohen, Ralph. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1974. 125–45. Print.Google Scholar
Werner, Krauss. Die Welt im spanischen Sprichwort. 1946. Leipzig: Reclam, 1971. Print.Google Scholar
Juri, Lotman. The Structure of the Artistic Text. Trans. Gail Lenhoff and Ronald Vroon. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 1977. Print. Michigan Slavic Contributions 7.Google Scholar
Amin, Maalouf. “Je parle du voyage comme d'autres parlent de leur maison.” Interview by David Rabouin. Magazine littéraire Jan. 2001: 98–103. Print.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Nietzsche. “On the Uses and Disadvantages of History for Life.” Untimely Meditations. Ed. Breazeale, Daniel. Trans. R. J. Hollingdale. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1997. 57–123. Print.Google Scholar
Plumb, J. H., ed. Crisis in the Humanities. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1964. Print.Google Scholar
Snow, Charles P. The Two Cultures. Introd. Stefan Collini. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1998. Print.Google Scholar
Leo, Spitzer. “Das Eigene und das Fremde: Über Philologie und Nationalsozialismus.” Lendemains 18.69–70 (1993): 179–91. Print.Google Scholar