Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T19:33:38.138Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Making Facts, Using Facts: Two Poetics of the Factual and One Theory of the Political

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Chenxi Tang
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In political thought, there is perhaps no more penetrating scrutiny of the significance of the factual than hannah Arendt's essay “Truth and Politics.” “Facts and events,” Arendt observes, are the “invariable outcome of men living and acting together.” As such, they “constitute the very texture of the political realm” (227). Concerning words and deeds of many actors, factual truth must be the basis for deliberations and opinions in the political space. “Freedom of opinion,” she continues, “is a farce unless factual information is guaranteed and the facts themselves are not in dispute. In other words, factual truth informs political thought just as rational truth informs philosophical speculation” (234). Yet facts are infinitely fragile things, for they occur in the ever-changing field of human affairs, “established through testimony by eyewitnesses—notoriously unreliable—and by records, documents, and monuments, all of which can be suspected as forgeries” (239). Facts can be manipulated, even denied outright by the powers that be. The lie, opposed to factual truth as error is to rational truth, represents a deliberate political action, since it aims “to change the world” (246).

Type
Theories and Methodologies
Information
PMLA , Volume 134 , Issue 5 , October 2019 , pp. 1165 - 1172
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Aeschylus, . The Eumenides. The Oresteia, translated by Greene, David and Lattimore, Richmond, 3rd ed., U of Chicago P, 2013, pp. 123–61.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. The Human Condition. U of Chicago P, 1958.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. “Truth and Politics”. Between Past and Future, Penguin Books, 1977, pp. 223–59.Google Scholar
Bacon, Francis. The New Organon. 1620. Edited by Jar-dine, Lisa and Silverthorne, Michael, Cambridge UP, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Peter. “The Law as Narrative and Rhetoric”. Law's Stories: Narrative and Rhetoric in the Law, edited by Brooks, and Gewirtz, Paul, Yale UP, 1996, pp. 14–22.Google Scholar
Burns, Robert. A Theory of the Trial. Princeton UP, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daston, Lorraine. “Baconian Facts, Academic Civility, and the Prehistory of Objectivity”. Annals of Scholarship, vol. 8, 1991, pp. 337–63.Google Scholar
Daston, Lorraine, and Galison, Peter. Objectivity. Zone Books, 2007.Google Scholar
Flaubert, Gustave. “On Realism”. Documents of Modern Literary Realism, edited by Becker, George J., Princeton UP, 1963, pp. 89–96.Google Scholar
Frank, Jerome. “Facts Are Guesses”. Courts on Trial: Myth and Reality in American Justice, Princeton UP, 1949, pp. 14–36.Google Scholar
Lukács, Georg. “Reportage or Portrayal”. Essays on Realism, edited by Livingstone, Rodney, translated by Fernbach, David, MIT Press, 1981, pp. 45–75.Google Scholar
Meyer, Philip. Storytelling for Lawyers. Oxford UP, 2014.Google Scholar
Nichols, Bill. Speaking Truths with Film: Evidence, Ethics, Politics in Documentary. U of California P, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novick, Peter. That Noble Dream: The “Objectivity Question” and the American Historical Profession. Cambridge UP, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, Julie Stone. “Theatrocracy Unwired: Legal Performance in the Modern Mediasphere”. Law and Literature, vol. 26, no. 1, 2014, pp. 31–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poovey, Mary. A History of the Modern Fact: Problems of Knowledge in the Sciences of Wealth and Society. U of Chicago P, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ranke, Leopold von. The Theory and Practice of History. Edited by Iggers, Georg, translated by Iggers, Wilma, Routledge, 2011.Google Scholar
Schudson, Michael. Origins of the Ideal of Objectivity in the Professions: Studies in the History of American Journalism and American Law, 1830–1940. Garland, 1990.Google Scholar
Scott, W. Richard. Institutions and Organization: Ideas, Interests, and Identities. 4th ed., SAGE Publications, 2014.Google Scholar
Shapin, Steven. A Social History of Truth: Civility and Truth in Seventeenth-Century England. U of Chicago P, 1995.Google Scholar
Shapin, Steven, and Schaffer, Simon. Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton UP, 1985.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Barbara. A Culture of Fact: England, 1550–1720. Cornell UP, 2000.Google Scholar
Sherwin, Richard. Visualizing Law in the Age of Digital Baroque. Routledge, 2011.Google Scholar
Simmel, Georg. “On the Concept and the Tragedy of Culture”. “The Conflict in Modern Culture” and Other Essays, translated by Etzkorn, K. Peter, Teachers College Press, 1968, pp. 27–46.Google Scholar
Tret'iakov, Sergei. “The New Leo Tolstoy.” Soviet Factography, special issue of October, edited by Devin Fore, vol. 118, Fall 2006, pp. 45–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tret'iakov, Sergei. “To Be Continued.” Soviet Factography, special issue of October, edited by Devin Fore, vol. 118, Fall 2006, pp. 51–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vismann, Cornelia. Medien der Rechtsprechung. Edited by Kemmerer, Alexandra and Krajewski, Markus, S. Fischer Verlag, 2011.Google Scholar
Zola, Émile. “The Experimental Novel”. Documents of Modern Literary Realism, edited by Becker, George J., Princeton UP, 1963, pp. 161–96.Google Scholar