Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-14T17:10:05.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Memory, Materiality, and Provenance in Dio Chrysostom's “Rhodian Oration”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Janet M. Atwill
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the late first century CE, probably under the rule of the Roman Emperor Titus, the Greek Bithynian Sophist Dio Chrysostom traveled to the city of Rhodes to scold its citizens for their treatment of statues. These were not religious statues, nor were they exemplary works of art. They were certainly not the marble statues commissioned by wealthy individuals for private display. In what would be known as his “Rhodian Oration,” Dio interceded on behalf of honorific portrait statues, erected by the city to honor those who had provided public gifts or services. This exchange of gift and honor is now referred to as euergetism (good works) or benefactions—a system of finance and governance whereby individuals subsidized public functions (such as religious festivals) and the construction of public facilities (such as the baths) or provided other gifts and services to the city. According to Dio, Rhodes was reusing honorific portrait statues—authorizing artisans to chisel out the names of those previously honored and reinscribe the statues' bases with the names of new honorees. As Dio argues, the city was, effectively, plundering its own statues.

Type
Theories and Methodologies
Information
PMLA , Volume 129 , Issue 3 , May 2014 , pp. 456 - 463
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Berthold, Richard M. Rhodes in the Hellenistic Age. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1984. Print.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. Logic of Practice. Trans. Nice, Richard. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1990. Print.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Trans. Nice, Richard. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1977. Print.Google Scholar
Brilliant, Richard. “Editorial: Do Art Objects Have Rights?” Art Bulletin 73.4 (1991): 534–35. Print.Google Scholar
Crowley, Sharon, and Selzer, Jack, eds. Rhetorical Bodies. Madison: U of Wisconsin P, 1999. Print.Google Scholar
Cuno, James. Who Owns Antiquity? Museums and the Battle over Our Ancient Heritage. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2010. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickinson, Greg, Blair, Carole, and Ott, Brian L., eds. Places of Public Memory: The Rhetoric of Museums and Memorials. Tuscaloosa: U of Alabama P, 2010. Print.Google Scholar
Dillon, Sheila. Ancient Greek Portrait Sculpture: Contexts, Subjects, and Styles. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2006. Print.Google Scholar
Chrysostom, Dio. “The Thirty-First Discourse: To the People of Rhodes.” Dio Chrysostom. Trans. Co-hoon, J. W. and Crosby, H. Lamar. Vol. 3. Cambridge: Harvard UP; London: Heinemann, 1940. 6–169. Print.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Margaret. “2015 Presidential Theme: Negotiating Sites of Memory.” Modern Language Association. MLA, 2014. Web. 15 Apr. 2014.Google Scholar
Garber, Margorie. Patronizing the Arts. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2008. Print.Google Scholar
Griffin, Miriam. “De beneficiis and Roman Society”. Journal of Roman Studies 93 (2003): 92–113. JSTOR. Web. 24 July 2008.Google Scholar
Hitchens, Christopher, Browning, Robert, and Binns, Graham. The Elgin Marbles: Should They Be Returned to Greece? London: Verso, 1998. Print.Google Scholar
Jones, C. P. The Roman World of Dio Chrysostom. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1978. Print.Google Scholar
Joyce, Rosemary. “From Place to Place: Provenience, Provenance, and Archaeology.” Provenance: An Alternate History of Art. Ed. Feigenbaum, Gail and Reist, Inge. Los Angeles: Getty Research Inst., 2012. 38–60. Print.Google Scholar
“Kóσμoς oυ, ó”. A Greek-English Lexicon, with Supplement. Ed. Liddell, Henry George, Scott, Robert, and Jones, Henry Stuart. Oxford: Clarendon, 1968. Print.Google Scholar
Lomas, Kathryn, and Cornell, Tim, eds. Bread and Circuses: Euergetism and Municipal Patronage in Roman Italy. London: Routledge, 2003. Print.Google Scholar
Lyons, Claire L. “Objects and Identities: Claiming and Reclaiming the Past.” Claiming the Stones, Naming the Bones: Cultural Property and the Negotiation of National and Ethnic Identity. Ed. Barkan, Elazar and Bush, Ronald. Los Angeles: Getty Research Inst., 2002. 116–37. Print.Google Scholar
Mattusch, Carol C. Classical Bronzes: The Art and Craft of Greek and Roman Statuary. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1996. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miles, Margaret M. Art as Plunder: The Ancient Origins of Debate about Cultural Property. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2008. Print.Google Scholar
Nora, Pierre. “Between Memory and History: Les Lieux de Mémoire”. Representations 26 (1989): 7–24. JSTOR. Web. 2 Feb. 2014.Google Scholar
Pausanias. Pausaniae Graeciae descriptio. Thesaurus linguae Graecae. U of California, 22 Apr. 2014. Web. 23 Apr. 2014.Google Scholar
Pliny. Natural History. Trans. Rackham, H. Vol. 9. Cambridge: Harvard UP; London: Heinemann, 1952. Print.Google Scholar
Schultz, Peter, and Hoff, Ralf von den, eds. Early Hellenistic Portraiture: Image, Style, Context. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2007. Print.Google Scholar
Smith, R. R. R. “Cultural Choice and Political Identity in Honorific Portrait Statues in the Greek East in the Second Century A. D”. Journal of Roman Studies 88 (1998): 56–93. Print.Google Scholar
St. Clair, William. Lord Elgin and His Marbles. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1998. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, Peter. Statues in Roman Society: Representation and Response. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2003. Print.Google Scholar
Swain, Simon, ed. Dio Chrysostom: Politics, Letters, and Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2000. Print.Google Scholar
Tanner, Jeffrey. “Portraits, Power, and Patronage in the Late Roman Empire”. Journal of Roman Studies 90 (2000): 18–50. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veyne, Paul. Bread and Circuses: Historical Sociology and Political Pluralism. Trans. Pearce, Brian. Abr. ed. London: Penguin, 1990. Print.Google Scholar
Zanker, Paul. The Mask of Socrates: The Image of the Intellectual in Antiquity. Berkeley: U of California P, 1995. Print.Google Scholar