Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:27:53.803Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nasal Variants after Final S in the Spanish of Jalisco

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2020

Daniel N. Cárdenas
Daniel N. Cárdenas*
Affiliation:
University of Oklahoma
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Article Commentary
Information
PMLA , Volume 70 , Issue 3 , June 1955 , pp. 556 - 561
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1955

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See BDH, iv (1938), 77.

2 PMLA, xi (1896), 133–134.

3 “Final Consonant plus N-glide in Jalisco, Mexico,” MLN, liv (1939), 441.

4 RFE, viii (1921), 378.

5 “Notes on the Spanish of Yucatan, Vera Cruz, and Tlaxcala,” MP, xxvii (1930), 458, n. 5.

6 “Final S plus N-glide in Mexico,” MLN, xlix (1934), 18–19.

7 “A Dialect and Folkloristic Study of Texts Recorded in Los Altos of Jalisco, Mexico,” Univ. of North Carolina Thesis (1949), ?174. Wright believes he has heard it as far north as Chihuahua in the speech of a servant (p. 19).

8 Navarro Tomás, Cuestionario lingiiislico hispanoamericano, 2nd ed. (Buenos Aires, 1945), p. 40, ?17.

9 The 2 points where I observed the final j plus e plus an alveolar n are adjacent to the 3 points (Acatic, Mezcala, and Jalostotitlán) where Robe observed the same phenomenon through recorded texts. By sheer coincidence none of the localities for which Robe presented recorded texts was studied by me.

10 Some may hold that this vocalic quality is closely related to the etymological e after d and r as described by Menéhdez Pidal in the Canlar de mio Cid as well as the antietymo-logical or paragogic e after s (mase, sone) described in the same work (Madrid, 1946, pp. 1177–84), a viewpoint that had first appeared in RFE, xx (1933), 345–350. This is hardly possible since in order to call this an etymological e it would be necessary to confirm the existence of the e from the 12th century to the present phenomenon of Jalisco. There is no diachronic evidence that spoken Spanish uses this e anywhere.

11 Henriquez Urefia, “Datos sobre el habla popular de Mexico,” BDH, iv (1938), 320. Luis Flórez, La pronunciation del español en Bogota (1950), ?143. Berta Elena Vidal de Battini, “El habla rural de San Luis,” BDH, vii (1949), 30, 40, 78, 101. Rodolfo Lenz, “El espanol en Chile,” BDH, vi (1940), 153, 188. Aurelio M. Espinosa, “Estudios sobre el espafiol de Nuevo Méjico,” MDH, i (1903;, 192,264 n.

12 Letter from Dr. Robe, 12 Feb. 1952.

13 Flórez, pp. 252, 255.

14 Carroll L. Riley, “Trade Spanish of the Paftaguero Panare,” SIL, xi (March 1952), 9.

15 Manual de entonación española (Hispanic Inst., 1944), p. 142.

16 Otto Jespersen. The Philosophy of Grammar (New York 1924), p. 303.

17 Navarro Tomás, Manual de entonación espanola, p. 78.

18 This is a revision of a paper read at the 1951 meeting of the MLA.