Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T01:51:34.673Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nature and Self-Love: A Reinterpretation of Rousseau's “Passion primitive”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2020

Juliet Flower MacCannell*
Affiliation:
Davis, California

Abstract

Rousseau opposed both traditional and modern (empiricist) thinking when he made self-love the cornerstone of his system. Other modes of thought treat self-consciousness as constituted primarily by temporal desire. Rousseau raises love, for him the suspension of desire, to a position of ontological primacy in regard to self-consciousness. Like Pascal, he throws the empirical existence of the self into radical question and finds it to be as insubstantial and empty a concept as the Western tradition has found it—from Ecclesiastes and Socrates on. Rousseau declines the moralistic reproof of the self, however, and emphasizes its insubstantiality as its one strength, although a fictional one. The self exists only in the mode of a hypothesis (the fictional “as if”); it is a failure at being. But to amour (and to pitié) it makes all the difference and is worthy of their support.

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 92 , Issue 5 , October 1977 , pp. 890 - 902
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

The author wishes to dedicate this essay to the memory of her mother, Patricia Mary Flower.