Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T02:50:42.426Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Paranoid Interpretation, Desire's Nonobject, and Nella Larsen's Passing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Brian Carr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article claims that much of the contemporary scholarship on Nella Larsen's Passing attempts to correct the delusional apprehensions of the novel's main character, Irene Redfield. I suggest that this corrective effort ultimately places critics in the paranoid orbit they aim to diagnose. Critics are unable to escape the logic of paranoia primarily because they read Irene's paranoia according to a conventional tropology of paranoia, homosexuality, and delusional jealousy. The paranoid gesture tries to prove that Passing is “really about” homosexuality and simply passing itself off as a novel about racial passing. I work through the psychoanalytic concepts of desire and paranoia to show how the novel incessantly thematizes the processes by which race and sexuality are substantialized in the scholarship. Ultimately, it is because Passing rigorously drains identitarian categories of substance that the novel is available to the paranoid substantializing of critics.

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 119 , Issue 2 , March 2004 , pp. 282 - 295
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Blackmore, David L. “‘That Unreasonable Restless Feeling’: The Homosexual Subtexts of Nella Larsen's Passing.” African American Review 26 (1992): 475–84.Google Scholar
Judith, Butler. “Passing, Queering: Nella Larsen's Psychoanalytic Challenge.” Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “Sex.” New York: Routledge, 1993. 167–85.Google Scholar
Hazel, Carby. Reconstructing Womanhood: The Emergence of the Afro-American Woman Novelist. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1987.Google Scholar
Joan, Copjec. “The Anxiety of the Influencing Machine.” October 23 (1982): 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joan, Copjec. Read My Desire: Lacan against the Historicists. Cambridge: MIT P, 1994.Google Scholar
Angela, Davis. Blues Legacies and Black Feminism: Gertrude “Ma” Rainey, Bessie Smith, and Billie Holiday. New York: Vintage, 1998.Google Scholar
Dylan, Evans. “From Kantian Ethics to Mystical Experience: An Exploration of Jouissance.” Key Concepts of Lacanian Psychoanalysis. Ed. Nobus, Danny. New York: Other, 1998. 1–28.Google Scholar
Bruce, Fink. “Knowledge and Jouissance.” Reading Seminar XX: Lacan's Major Work on Love, Knowledge, and Feminine Sexuality. Ed. Barnard, Suzanne and Fink, . New York: Norton, 2002. 21–45.Google Scholar
Sigmund, Freud. “Certain Neurotic Mechanisms in Jealousy, Paranoia, and Homosexuality.” Sexuality and the Psychology of Love. Ed. Rieff, Phillip. New York: Macmillan, 1963. 150–60.Google Scholar
Sigmund, Freud. “(Draft H): Paranoia.” The Origins of Psychoanalysis: Letters to Wilhelm Fliess, Drafts, and Notes: 1887–1902. Trans. Eric Mosbacher and James Strachey. Ed. Marie Bonaparte, Anna Freud, and Ernst Kris. New York: Basic, 1954. 109–15.Google Scholar
Sigmund, Freud. “Psycho-analytic Notes upon an Auto-biographical Account of a Case of Paranoia (Dementia Paranoides).” 1911. Sigmund Freud: Collected Papers. Vol. 3. Trans. Alix Strachey and James Strachey. Ed. Ernest Jones. New York: Basic, 1959. 387–470.Google Scholar
Russell, Grigg. “From the Mechanism of Psychosis to the Universal Condition of the Symptom: On Foreclosure.” Key Concepts of Lacanian Psychoanalysis. Ed. Nobus, Danny. New York: Other, 1998. 48–74.Google Scholar
Samira, Kawash. Dislocating the Color Line: Identity, Hybridity and Singularity in African American Narrative. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1997.Google Scholar
Jacques, Lacan. “Aggressiveness in Psychoanalysis.” Lacan, Ecrits 10–30.Google Scholar
Jacques, Lacan. Ecrits: A Selection. Trans. Bruce Fink. New York: Norton, 2002.Google Scholar
Jacques, Lacan. “The Freudian Thing; or, The Meaning of the Return to Freud in Psychoanalysis.” Lacan, Ecrits 107–37.Google Scholar
Jacques, Lacan. “The Function and Field of Speech and Language in Psychoanalysis.” Lacan, Ecrits 31–106.Google Scholar
Jacques, Lacan. The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book III: The Psychoses, 1955-1956. Trans. Russell Grigg. Ed. Jacques-Alain Miller. New York: Norton, 1993.Google Scholar
Jacques, Lacan. The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book VII: The Ethics of Psychoanalysis, 1959–1960. Ed. Miller, Jacques-Alain. Trans. Dennis Porter. New York: Norton, 1997.Google Scholar
Jacques, Lacan. The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book XX: Encore: On Feminine Sexuality, the Limits of Love and Knowledge, 1972–1973. Trans. Bruce Fink. Ed. Jacques Alain-Miller. New York: Norton, 1999.Google Scholar
Nella, Larsen. Passing. Larsen, Quicksand and Passing 137–242.Google Scholar
Nella, Larsen. Quicksand and Passing. 1929. Ed. McDowell, Deborah E. New Brunswick: Rutgers UP, 1996.Google Scholar
McDowell, Deborah E. Introduction. Larsen, Quicksand and Passing ix-xxxv.Google Scholar
Sedgwick. Eve Kosofsky. “Paranoid Reading and Reparative Reading; or, You're So Paranoid, You Probably Think This Introduction Is about You.” Novel Gazing: Queer Readings in Fiction. Ed. Sedgwick. Durham: Duke UP, 1997. 1–37.Google Scholar
Kaja, Silverman. World Spectators. Stanford: Stanford UP, 2000.Google Scholar
Thorstein, Veblen. The Theory of the Leisure Class. 1899. Toronto: Dover, 1994.Google Scholar
Žižek, Slavoj. On Belief. London: Routledge, 2001.Google Scholar
Zupančič, Alenka. Ethics of the Real: Kant, Lacan. London: Verso, 2000.Google Scholar