Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:46:47.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Priorities in Language Education

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2020

John S. Diekhoff*
Affiliation:
University of Michigan

Extract

When the Foreign Language Program of the Modern Language Association was five years old, in 1957, its Advisory and Liaison Committee drew up a plan for its second five years and prepared a request for a foundation grant to implement the plan. The proposal outlined five areas of major effort. There were activities designed to increase the quantity of language study, but these activities were to be more than an extension of prior promotional activities of the MLA Foreign Language Program. The intention was still to persuade educators, parents, and the general public of the value of language education and of the necessity for sequences of language study that could result in proficiency in the spoken and written language. But in addition to an “information and advisory campaign,” the MLA also proposed “effective demonstration programs.”

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

An address given at the General Meeting on the Foreign Language Program in New York, 29 December 1964.

References

1 “A Five-Year Program for Improving Modern Foreign Language Instruction in the National Interest,” mimeographed (New York: MLA, 1957).

2 Lawrence G. Derthick, “The Purpose and Legislative History of the Foreign Languages Titles in the National Defense Education Act, 1958,” PMLA, lxxiv (May 1959), 48.

3 “The Foreign Language Program in Title III of the National Defense Education Act,” PMLA, lxxv (May 1960), 11.

4 The National Interest and Foreign Languages, third ed. (Washington, D. C, 1961), pp. 16–17.