Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:48:28.926Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Racism Revisited: Sources, Relevance, and Aporias of a Modern Concept

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Étienne Balibar
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Why do we call certain attitudes, both individual and collective, racist? Why do we list certain discourses—admittedly a very wide range of discourses, which single out, stigmatize, threaten, or discriminate against various human and social groups—as racist? Why do we consider that practices, both spontaneous and institutional, unofficial and officially organized, that in the past and present have resulted in lasting forms of oppression, persistent hostilities and misunderstanding, and sometimes tragic violence in all sorts of societies are racist? To my surprise, this basic and preliminary question is seldom addressed in the huge scholarly and popular literature concerning racism—the old and new forms of racism, the modernity or antiquity of racism, the quantitative and qualitative variations of racism, and so on. Or, better said, the question is addressed only partially and indirectly: the category itself is taken for granted, all the more because the study of racism has become an essential sociological and political object, and what are mainly discussed are different definitions and theories and the conditions of their application. It seems that the very fact that there exists (and has long existed) something called racism, which includes a variety of manifestations, is subject to transformations, and does not purely and simply coincide with violence, not even violence based on collective hatred, need not be questioned. But isn't it necessary to discuss the reasons that we consider this fact obvious?

Type
The Changing Profession
Information
PMLA , Volume 123 , Issue 5: Special Topic Comparative Racialization , October 2008 , pp. 1630 - 1639
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 by The Modern Language Association of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Antelme, Robert. L'espèce humaine. 1957. Rev. ed. Paris: Gallimard, 1994.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. The Origins of Totalitarianism. 1951. New York: Harcourt, 1968.Google Scholar
Balibar, Étienne. “Difference, Otherness, Exclusion.” Parallax 11.1 (2005): 19–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balibar, Étienne. “Le retour de la race.” Mouvements 50 (2007): 162–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balibar, Étienne, and Wallerstein, Immanuel. Race, Nation, Class: Ambiguous Identities. Trans. Chris Turner. London: Verso, 1991.Google Scholar
Benedict, Ruth. Race and Racism. 1942. Fwd. John Rex. London: Routledge, 1983.Google Scholar
Delacampagne, Christian. L'invention du racisme. Antiquité et Moyen-Âge. Paris: Fayard, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Souza, Dinesh. The End of Racism: Principles for a Multiracial Society. New York: Free, 1995.Google Scholar
Fanon, Frantz. Peau noire, masques blancs. Paris: Seuil, 1971. Trans. as Black Skin, White Masks. Trans. Charles Lam Markmann. New York: Grove, 1967.Google Scholar
Four Statements on the Race Question. Paris: UNESCO, 1969.Google Scholar
Gilroy, Paul. Against Race: Imagining Political Culture beyond the Color Line. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 2000.Google Scholar
Goldberg, David Theo. The Racial State. Malden: Blackwell, 2002.Google Scholar
Hall, Stuart. “Race, Articulation, and Societies Structured in Dominance.” Sociological Theories: Race and Colonialism. UNESCO, 1980. 305–45.Google Scholar
Hertz, Friedrich. Race and Civilization. Trans. A. S. Levetus and W. Entz. London: Kegan, 1928.Google Scholar
Hirschfeld, Magnus. Racism. Trans. Eden Paul and Cedar Paul. 1933–34. New York: Kennikat, 1973.Google Scholar
Hund, Wulf D. “Inclusion and Exclusion: Dimensions of Racism.” Rassismus. Ed. Torres, Max Sebastian Hering and Schmale, Wolfgang. Spec. issue of Wiener Zeitschrift zur Geschichte der Neuzeit 3 (2003): 6–19.Google Scholar
Levi, Primo. Se questo è un uomo. Torino: Einaudi, 1958. Trans. as If This Is a Man. Trans. Stuart Woolf. New York: Penguin, 1979.Google Scholar
Miles, Robert. Racism. New York: Routledge, 1989.Google Scholar
The Race Concept. Paris: UNESCO, 1952.Google Scholar
Le racisme devant la science. Paris: UNESCO; Gallimard, 1960.Google Scholar
Taguieff, Pierre-André, ed. Face au racisme. Paris: Découverte, 1991.Google Scholar
Taguieff, Pierre-André, ed. La force du préjugé: Essai sur le racisme et ses doubles. Paris: Découverte, 1988. Trans. as The Force of Prejudice: On Racism and Its Doubles. Trans. Hassan Melehy. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2001.Google Scholar
United to Combat Racism: Dedicated to the World Conference against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia, and Related Intolerance: Durban, South Africa, 31 August-7 September 2001. Pref. Koïchiro Matsuura and Mary Robinson. Paris: UNESCO, 2001.Google Scholar