Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-27T18:32:51.868Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Semiotizing the Sphere: Organicist Theory in Lotman, Bakhtin, and Vernadsky

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Jerry Leo  and
Amy Mandelker
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Semiotic theory during the 1980s and early 1990s in the former Soviet Union departs significantly from earlier, structuralist models. Central to this new declination is Yury Lotman's theory of the semiosphere, a metaphor that, in its spatialization of meaning, draws on Vernadsky's concept of the biosphere and Bakhtin's idea of the logosphere. This article evaluates the semiosphere from historical, comparative, and feminist critical perspectives. The historical perspective situates Lotman's theory within the Russian organicist philosophical tradition (including Vernadsky and Bakhtin), and the comparative considers Russian theory as a counterpart to Western models of signification. The feminist critique is motivated by the fact that, in relying on metaphors borrowed from reproductive biology, organicist theory participates in a theoretical discourse that has perpetuated stereotyped categories based on gender differences. (AM)

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 109 , Issue 3 , May 1994 , pp. 385 - 396
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Abrams, M. H The Mirror and the Lamp: Romantic Theory and the Critical Condition. London: Oxford UP, 1953.Google Scholar
Bailes, Kendall E Science and Russian Culture in an Age of Revolutions: V. I. Vernadsky and His Scientific School, 1863–1945. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1990.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail . [The Aesthetics of Literary Creation.] Ed. S. G. Bocharov. Moskva: Iskusstvo, 1979.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail “From Notes Made in 1970–71.” Bakhtin, “Speech Genres” 132–13.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail “ 1970–1971 ” [From Notes Made in 1970–71]. Bakhtin, 336–33.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail “” [Toward a Philosophy of the Act]. [Philosophy and Sociology: Science and Engineering]. Moskva: Nauka, 1984–85. 80–160.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail “” [Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences]. Bakhtin, 361–36.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail “Speech Genres” and Other Late Essays. Ed. Emerson, Caryl and Holquist, Michael. Trans. McGee, Vern. Austin: U of Texas P, 1986.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail “Toward a Methodology for the Human Sciences.” Bakhtin, “Speech Genres.”Google Scholar
Bauer, Dale M Feminist Dialogics: A Theory of Failed Community. Albany: State U of New York P, 1988.Google Scholar
Bauer, Dale M., and McKinstry, S. Jaret, eds Feminism, Bakhtin, and the Dialogic. Albany: State U of New York P, 1991.Google Scholar
Bordo, Susan “The Cartesian Masculinization of Thought.” Signs 11 (1986). Rpt. in Discovering Reality: Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics, Methodology, and the Philosophy of Science. Ed. Harding, Sandra and Hintikka, M. B. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1983. 439–43.Google Scholar
Campbell, Joseph The Hero with a Thousand Faces. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1949.Google Scholar
Clark, Katerina, and Holquist, Michael Mikhail Bakhtin. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1984.Google Scholar
de Lauretis, Teresa Alice Doesn't. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1987.Google Scholar
Emerson, Caryl “Bakhtin and Women: A Non-topic with Immense Implications.” Fruits of Her Plume: Essays on Contemporary Russian Women's Culture. Ed. Goscilo, Helena. New York: Sharpe, 1993. 3–20.Google Scholar
Emerson, Caryl “The Outer Word and Inner Speech: Bakhtin, Vygotsky, and the Internalization of Language.” Bakhtin: Essays and Dialogues on His Work. Ed. Morson, Gary Saul. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1981. 21–40.Google Scholar
Fausto-Sterling, Anne Myths of Gender: Biological Theories about Women and Men. New York: Basic, 1988.Google Scholar
Gazanaga, Michael The Social Brain: Discovering the Networks of the Mind. New York: Basic, 1985.Google Scholar
Geschwind, Norman, and Galaburda, N. A., eds Cerebral Lateralization: Biological Mechanisms, Associations, and Pathology. Cambridge: MIT P, 1987.Google Scholar
Hankinson-Nelson, Lynn Who Knows? From Quine to a Feminist Empiricism. Philadelphia: Temple UP, 1990.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna Crystals, Fabrics, and Fields: Metaphors of Organicism in Twentieth-Century Developmental Biology. New Haven: Yale UP, 1976.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1991.Google Scholar
Ivanov, V. V “ M. M. ” [The Significance of Bakhtin's Ideas on Sign, Utterance, and Dialogue for Modern Semiotics]. [Sign Systems Studies] 6 (1973): 5–45.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman Kindersprache und augemeine Lautgesetze. The Hague: Mouton, 1962.Google Scholar
Jameson, Frederic The Prison-House of Language: A Critical Account of Structuralism and Russian Formalism. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1972.Google Scholar
Keller, Evelyn Fox Reflections of Gender and Science. New Haven: Yale UP, 1985.Google Scholar
Lotman, Iurii “” [Asymmetry and Dialogue]. [Sign Systems Studies] 16 (1983): 15–30.Google Scholar
Lotman, Iurii “” [Culture and the Organism]. Unpublished ms.Google Scholar
Lotman, Iurii [Culture and Explosion]. Moskva: Progress, 1992.Google Scholar
Lotman, Iurii “” [The Brain, the Text, Culture, and Artificial Intelligence]. Ce [Semiotics and Information] 17 (1981).Google Scholar
Lotman, Iurii “The Origin of Plot in the Light of Typology.” Poetics Today 1 (1979): 161–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lotman, Iurii “O ” [On the Semiosphere]. Tpy no [Sign Systems Studies] 17 (1984): 5–23.Google Scholar
Lotman, Iurii “Te ” [The Text within the Text]. Tpy [Sign Systems Studies] 14 (1981): 3–19.Google Scholar
Lotman, Iurii The Universe of the Mind. Ed. and trans. Shukman, Ann. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1991.Google Scholar
Lotman, Iurii, and Nikolaenko, Nikolai “” [Reconsidering the Mysterious “Golden Mean”]. [Decorative Arts] 9 (1983): 31–34.Google Scholar
Lotman, Iurii M., et al “Theses on the Semiotic Study of Cultures (as Applied to Slavic Texts).” The Tell-Tale Sign: A Survey of Semiotics. Ed. Sebeok, Thomas A. Lisse: de Ridder, 1975. 57–83.Google Scholar
Lovelock, J. E The Ages of Gaia: A Biography of Our Living Earth. New York: Norton, 1988.Google Scholar
McTaggart, John The Nature of Existence. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1921.Google Scholar
Morson, Gary Saul, and Emerson, Caryl Re-thinking Bakhtin. Evanston: Northwestern UP, 1989.Google Scholar
Orsini, G. N. G “The Organic Concept in Aesthetics.” Comparative Literature 21 (1969): 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, D. G “Organicism in the Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries.” Journal of the History of Ideas 31 (1970): 413–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaget, Jean Language and Thought of the Child. New York: World, 1955.Google Scholar
Reid, Allan “Who Is Lotman and Why Is Bakhtin Saying Those Nasty Things about Him?” Bakhtin and Otherness. Ed. Robert F. Barsky and Michael Holquist. Spec. issue of Discours social/Social Discourse 3.1–2 (1990): 325–32.Google Scholar
Salvestroni, Simonetta “Bakhtin between the Russian Culture of the 1920s and New Contemporary Ideas.” Unpublished essay.Google Scholar
Schelling, Schelling Friedrich Wilhelm “On the Relation of the Plastic Arts to Nature.” Trans. Cabot, J. E. The German Classics. Vol. 5. New York: German, 1913. 106–36. 20 vols. Trans, of “Über das Verhältnis der bildenden Künste zu der Natur.”Google Scholar
Shukman, Ann “Semiotic Aspects of the Work of Jurij Michailovic Lotman.” The Semiotic Web 1987. Ed. Sebeok, Thomas A. and Umiker-Sebeok, Jean. Approaches to Semiotics 81. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1987. 65–78.Google Scholar
Terras, Victor Belinskij and Russian Literary Criticism: The Heritage of Organic Aesthetics. Madison: U of Wisconsin P, 1974.Google Scholar
Tuana, Nancy, ed Feminism and Science. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1989.Google Scholar
Vernadskii, Vladimir “The Biosphere and the Noösphere.” American Scientist 33 (1945): 1–12.Google Scholar
Vološinov, V. N Map [Marxism and the Philosophy of Language: Basic Problems of the Sociological Method in Linguistics]. 2nd ed. Leningrad: Priboi, 1930.Google Scholar
Vološinov, V. N Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. Trans. Matejka, Ladislav and Titunik, I. R. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1986.Google Scholar