Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T14:38:27.210Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Automated spaceborne detection of degraded vegetation around Monchegorsk, Kola Peninsula, Russia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2011

W. G. Rees
W. G. Rees*
Affiliation:
Scott Polar Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1ER (wgr2@cam.ac.uk)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper develops a simple method for the detection of ‘vegetation anomalies’, locations where the amount of vegetation, estimated through the use of the normalised difference vegetation index (NDVI), is significantly lower than expected on the basis of topographic factors alone. The method is developed and tested using satellite imagery from the area around the town of Monchegorsk on the Kola Peninsula, Russia. This area has been subject to heavy levels of airborne industrial pollution for many years and the intended purpose of the method is to allow the extent of pollution damaged vegetation to be estimated with as few operational decisions as possible by the data analyst, thus suiting it for automation and for the analysis of time-series of satellite images. While the work described in this paper is to some extent preliminary, it does establish that spatial variations in the NDVI of undisturbed vegetation can, at least in the study area, be modelled satisfactorily using topographic variables, and that negative departures from this modelled variation are very strongly associated with industrially mediated damage.

Type
Research Article
Information
Polar Record , Volume 48 , Special Issue 1: Papers from the 11th Circumpolar Remote Sensing Symposium , January 2012 , pp. 107 - 112
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Biehl, L., and Landgrebe, D.. 2002. MultiSpec – a tool for multispectral-hyperspectral image data analysis. Computers and Geosciences 28 (10): 1153–1159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goetz, A.F.H., Vane, G., Solomon, J.E., and Rock, B.N.. 1985. Imaging spectrometry for Earth remote sensing. Science 228: 1147–1153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johansen, M.E., Tømmervik, H., Guneriussen, T., and Pedersen, J.P.. 1995. Using a geographic information system (ARC/INFO) to integrate remote sensed and in-situ data in an analysis of the air pollution effects on terrestrial ecosystems in the border areas between Norway and Russia. In: Lobersli, E., and Venn, K. (editors). Second symposium on the effects of air pollutants on terrestrial ecosystems in the border area between Russia and Norway. Svanvik, Norway: Statens forurensningstilsyn: 120–130.Google Scholar
Litinksy, P. (editor).1996. Assessment of boreal pine forests decline around ore/dressing mill using satellite images. Petrozavodsk: Russian Academy of Sciences (in Russian).Google Scholar
Lunetta, R., and Elvidge, C.. 1999. Remote sensing change detection. London:Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
NASA (2011). URL: http://landsathandbook.gsfc.nasa.gov/handbook. (accessed 24 May 2011).Google Scholar
Pitblado, J.R., and Amiro, B.D.. 1982. Landsat mapping of the industrially disturbed vegetation communities of Sudbury, Canada. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing 8 (1): 16–29.Google Scholar
Rasband, W.S. 1997–2011. ImageJ. US National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. URL: http://imagej.nih/gov/ij Last (accessed 24 May 11).Google Scholar
Rees, W.G., and Kapitsa, A.P.. 1994. Industrial pollution in the Kol'skiy Poluostrov, Russia. Polar Record 30: 181–188.Google Scholar
Rees, W.G., and Rigina, O.. 2003. Methodologies for remote sensing of the environmental impacts of industrial activity in the Arctic and Sub-Arctic. In: Rasmussen, R.O., and Koroleva, N.E. (editors). Social and environmental impacts in the north. Dordrecht: Kluwer: 67–88.Google Scholar
Rees, W.G., and Williams, M.. 1997. Monitoring changes in land cover induced by atmospheric pollution in the Kola Peninsula, Russia, using LANDSAT MSS data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 18: 1703–1723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rigina, O. 2002. Environmental impact assessment of the mining and concentration activities on the Kola Peninsula, Russia, by multidate remote sensing. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 75 (1): 13–33.Google Scholar
Toutoubalina, O.V., and Rees, W.G.. 1999. Remote sensing of industrial impact on Arctic vegetation around Noril'sk, northern Siberia: preliminary results. International Journal of Remote Sensing 20: 2979–2990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tømmervik, H., Johansen, M.E., Pedersen, J.P., and Guneriussen, T.. 1998. Integration of remote sensed and in-situ data in an analysis of the air pollution effects on terrestrial ecosystems in the border areas between Norway and Russia. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 49: 51–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, C.J., Fung, I.Y., Keeling, C.D., and Gammon, R.H.. 1986. Relationship between atmospheric CO2 variations and a satellite-derived vegetation index. Nature 319: 195–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tutubalina, O.V., and Rees, W.G.. 2001. Vegetation degradation in a permafrost region as seen from space: Noril'sk (1961–1999). Cold Regions Science and Technology 32 (2): 191–203.Google Scholar
Vincent, R.K. 1972. An ERTS multispectral scanner experiment for mapping iron compounds. In: 8th international symposium on remote sensing of environment. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Environmental Research Institute of Michigan: 1239–1247.Google Scholar
van Wijk, M.T., Williams, M., and Shaver, G.R.. 2004. Tight coupling between leaf area index and foliage N content in arctic plant communities. Ecosystem Ecology 142 (3): 421–427.Google ScholarPubMed