Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T14:21:05.603Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Canada's northern policy: retrospect and prospect

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

Extract

That sentence referred, in fact, to the impending transfer of the Arctic islands to Canada in 1879, but it could have applied, just as aptly, to the whole of northern Canada. The first part of it was largely correct; the second part is still a matter for conjecture, debate and experiment.

Most of the Canadian Government's sporadic forays into the north from 1880 onwards were motivated by the reaction of politicians and officials aliens in the Arctic. There was nothing else in the north for a government to be concerned about. The fur trade was important to the Hudson's Bay Company, and it was to become important to many of the Eskimos, but had lost its pre-eminence in a nation where trans-continental railways and millions of immigrants were the priorities of the day. The great age of Arctic exploration was ending: a North West Passage was irrelevant in a world that was planning a Panama Canal. The whalers too would depart from northern waters, and the missionaries and the Hudson Bay factors would left to themselves.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Canada. Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development. 1955 to 1967. Government activities in the north. Ottawa, Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development.Google Scholar
Canada. Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development. 1968. The Yukon today. Ottawa, Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development.Google Scholar
Canada. Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development. 1965. The Northwest Territories today. Ottawa, Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development.Google Scholar
Carrothers, A. W. R., Beetz, J. and Parker, J. H. 1966. Report of the Advisory Commission on the development of government in the Northwest Territories Vol 1. Ottawa, Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development.Google Scholar
Great Britain, Colonial Office. 1879. Colonial Papers, Canada, original correspondence (CO42), Vol 759, p 19. London, Public Record Office.Google Scholar
Jenness, D. 1964. Eskimo Administration: 2. Canada. Arctic Institute of North America Technical Paper No 14.Google Scholar
Marsden, M. 1966. Resources and communications in the Arctic. In: The Arctic frontier, Macdonald, R. St J., ed. Toronto, University of Toronto Press, p 29.Google Scholar
Massey, V. 1963. Whats past is prologue. London, Macmillan.Google Scholar
McEwen, E. R. 1967. Report of Executive Director to the Eighth Annual Meeting, 30 September 1967. Calgary, Indian-Eskimo Association of Canada.Google Scholar
Phillips, R. A. J. 1967. Canada's north. Toronto, Macmillan of Canada.Google Scholar
Smith, G. W. 1966. Sovereignty in the north: the Canadian aspect of an international problem. In: The Arctic frontier, Macdonald, R. St J., ed. Toronto, University of Toronto Press, p 203.Google Scholar
Sutherland, R. J. 1966. The strategic significance of the Canadian Arctic. In: The Arctic frontier, Macdonald, R. St J., ed. Toronto, University of Toronto Press, p 256–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toombs, R. B. and Janes, T. H. 1968. The Canadian mineral industry in 1967. Canadian Mining Journal, Vol 89, No 2, p 81.Google Scholar