Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T14:51:24.515Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fluctuations in populations of Adélie penguins at Cape Bird, Antarctica

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

Kerry-Jayne Wilson
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Box 84, Lincoln University, Canterbury, New Zealand

Abstract

The results of a monitoring study of three Adelie penguin (Pygoscelis adeliae) rookeries at Cape Bird (77° 13'S, 166°28'E), Antarctica, are presented. Occupied nests were counted immediately after egg laying in most years between 1965 and 1970, and annually from 1974 to 1987. The population has not shown the degree of stability that might be expected of a long-lived species with a low reproductive rate, twice deviating significantly from a mean value of about 37,500 pairs. In the censused rookeries numbers dropped by about 16% in 1967 and a further 30% in 1968. The 1968 decline was attributed to extensive fast ice, but numbers were unaffected in two subsequent years with similar ice conditions. After eight years of relative stability around the pre-1967 level, a period of rapid growth began in 1982 and 1983. The total of 54,000 pairs in 1987, the last year for which numbers are available, was the highest ever counted at Cape Bird. These results stress the need for caution when using bird populations to detect man-induced changes in the marine environment.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ainley, D. G. and LeResche, R. E. 1973. The effects of weather and ice conditions on breeding in Adélie penguins. Condor 75: 235–55.Google Scholar
Croxall, J. P. and Prince, P. A. 1979. Antarctic seabird and seal monitoring studies. Polar Record 19: 573–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, L.S.. 1988. Co-ordination of incubation routines and mate choice in Adélie penguins (Pygoscelis adeliae). Auk 105: 428–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, L S. and McCaffry, F. T. 1986. Survival analysis of eggs and chicks of Adelie penguins (Pygoscelis adeliae). Auk 103: 379–88.Google Scholar
Davis, L. S., Ward, G. D. and Sadleir, R. M. F. S. 1988. Foraging by Adélie penguins during the incubation period. Notornis 35: 1523.Google Scholar
Emison, W. B. 1968. Feeding preferences of the Adélie penguin at Cape Crozier, Ross Island. Antarctic Research Series 12: 191212.Google Scholar
Harper, P. C., Knox, G. A., Spurr, E. B., Taylor, R. H., Wilson, G. J. and Young, E. C. 1984. The status and conservation of birds in the Ross Sea sector of Antarctica. ICBP Technical Publication 2: 593608.Google Scholar
Laws, R. M. 1983. Antarctica: a convergence of life. New Scientist 99: 608–16.Google Scholar
Paulian, C. D. 1975. Feeding of the Adélie penguin Pygoscelis adeliae. Mauri Ora 3: 2730.Google Scholar
Puddicombe, R. A. and Johnstone, G. W. 1988. The breeding season diet of Adélie penguins at the Vestfold Hills, East Antarctica. Hydrobiologia 165: 239–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SCAR. 1979. Fifteenth meeting of SCAR, Chamonix 16–26 May 1978. Appendix A. Working Group on biology. Polar Record 19: 304–12.Google Scholar
Spurr, E. B. 1975. Breeding of the Adélie penguin (Pygoscelis adeliae) at Cape Bird. Ibis 117: 324–38.Google Scholar
Taylor, R. H., Wilson, P. R. and Thomas, B. W. 1990. Status and trends of Adélie penguin populations in the Ross Sea region. Polar Record 26 (159): 293304.Google Scholar
van Heezik, Y. 1988. Diet of Adélie penguins during the incubation period at Cape Bird, Ross Island, Antarctica. Notornis 351: 2326.Google Scholar
Wilson, G.J. 1983. Distribution and abundance of Antarctic and sub-Antarctic penguins. A synthesis of current knowledge. BHOMASS Scientific Series 4.Google Scholar
Young, E. C. 1981. The ornithology of the Ross Sea. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand 11: 287315.Google Scholar