Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T15:06:42.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Inuit perspectives of polar bear research: lessons for community-based collaborations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 March 2017

Pamela B.Y. Wong ,
M.G. Dyck ,
R.W. Murphy ,
Arviat Hunters and Trappers ,
Ikajutit Hunters and Trappers  and
Mayukalik Hunters and Trappers
Pamela B.Y. Wong
Affiliation:
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto and Department of Natural History, Royal Ontario Museum, 100 Queen's Park, Toronto M5S 2C6, Canada (pamela.wong@utoronto.ca)
M.G. Dyck
Affiliation:
Department of Environment, Government of Nunavut, PO Box 209, Igloolik X0A 0L0, Canada
R.W. Murphy
Affiliation:
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto and Department of Natural History, Royal Ontario Museum, 100 Queen's Park, Toronto M5S 2C6, Canada
Arviat Hunters and Trappers
Affiliation:
PO Box 529, Arviat X0C 0E0, Canada
Ikajutit Hunters and Trappers
Affiliation:
PO Box 39, Arctic Bay X0A 0A0Canada
Mayukalik Hunters and Trappers
Affiliation:
PO Box 99, Kimmirut X0A 0N0, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Research partnerships with northern communities hold promise for capacity and resilience against environmental changes. Given their historical ecological and cultural relationship with and, thus, ongoing concern for polar bears, Inuit communities are keen to participate in monitoring programmes. In spite of this, northern communities continue to meet polar bear research and collaborations with some resistance. Here, we summarise and report interviews with Nunavummiut from four communities on Inuit experiences with polar bears and research perspectives. Research interactions reveal ongoing cultural, socio-ecological and ethical barriers to polar bear research projects. Research licenses and standardised ethics procedures do not always guarantee collaborations. Adaptable research methods, mutual understanding and open dialogue are essential to form strong research partnerships with northern communities.

Type
Research Article
Information
Polar Record , Volume 53 , Issue 3 , May 2017 , pp. 257 - 270
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agrawal, A. 1995. Dismantling the divide between indigenous and scientific knowledge. Development and Change 26: 413–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, M. and Aars, J.. 2008. Short-term behavioural response of polar bears (Ursus maritimus) to snowmobile disturbance. Polar Biology 31: 501–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armitage, D., Berkes, F., Dale, A. and others. 2011. Co-management and the co-production of knowledge: learning how to adapt in Canada's Arctic. Global Environmental Change 21: 995–1004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arviat Hunters and Trappers. 2011. IQ implementation on the WHB polar bear: Arviat. Project No.: 222-10-01.Google Scholar
Berkes, F., Berkes, M.K. and Fast, H.. 2007. Collaborative integrated management of Canada's north: the role of local and traditional knowledge in community-based monitoring. Coastal Management 35: 143–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bocking, S. 2007. Science and spaces in the northern environment. Environmental History 12: 867–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunet, N.D., Hickey, G.M. and Humphries, M.M.. 2014a. The evolution of local participation and the mode of knowledge production in Arctic Research. Ecology and Society 19: 69–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunet, N.D., Hickey, G.M. and Humphries, M.M.. 2014b. Understanding community-researcher partnerships in the natural sciences: a case study from the Arctic. Journal of Rural Studies 36: 247–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckland, S.T., Anderson, D.R., Burnham, K.P. and other. 2001. Introduction to distance sampling. London: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buytaert, W., Zulkafli, Z., Grainger, S. and others. 2014. Citizen science in hydrology and water resources: opportunities for knowledge generation, ecosystem service management, and sustainable development. Frontiers in Earth Science 2. doi:10.3389/feart.2014.00026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, and Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. 2010. Tri-council policy statement: ethical conduct for research involving humans. URL: http://www.pre.ethics.gc.ca/pdf/eng/tcps2/TCPS_2_FINAL_Web.pdf, [accessed 20 August 2016].Google Scholar
Clark, D.A., Lee, D.S., Freeman, M.M.R. and other. 2008. Polar bear conservation in Canada: defining the policy problems. Arctic 61: 347–360.Google Scholar
Clark, D.A., Meek, C., Cheechoo, J. and others. 2013. Polar bears and CITES: a rejoinder to Parsons and Cornick. Marine Policy 38: 365–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derocher, A.E., Andriashek, D. and Stirling, I.. 1993. Terrestrial foraging by polar bears during the ice-free period in western Hudson Bay. Arctic 46: 251–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowsley, M. 2005. Inuit knowledge regarding climate change and the Baffin Bay polar bear population. Final Wildlife Report No. 1. Iqaluit: Department of Environment, Government of Nunavut: 43 pp.Google Scholar
Dowsley, M. 2009. Community clusters in wildlife and environmental management: using TEK and community involvement to improve co-management in an era of rapid environmental change. Polar Research 28: 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowsley, M. 2007. Inuit perspectives on polar bears (Ursus maritimus) and climate change in Baffin Bay, Nunavut, Canada. Research and Practice in Social Sciences 2: 53–74.Google Scholar
Dowsley, M. and Wenzel, G.. 2008. ‘The time of the most polar bears’: a co-management conflict in Nunavut. Arctic 61: 177–189.Google Scholar
Dowsley, M., Lemelin, R.H. and Washaho First Nation at Fort Severn. 2013. Developing community capacities through scenario planning for natural resource management: a case study of polar bears. Society and Natural Resources: An International Journal 26: 977–986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyck, M.G. 2006. Characteristics of polar bears killed in defense of life and property in Nunavut, Canada, 1970–2000. Ursus 17: 52–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyck, M.G. and Romberg, S.. 2007. Observations of a wild polar bear (Ursus maritimus) successfully fishing Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus) and fourhorn sculpin (Myoxocephalus quadricornis) . Polar Biology 30: 1625–1628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyck, M.G., Soon, W., Baydack, R.K. and others. 2007. Polar bears of Western Hudson Bay and climate change: are warming spring air temperatures the “ultimate” survival control factor? Ecological Complexity 4: 73–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyck, M.G., Soon, W., Baydack, R.K. and others. 2008. Reply to response to Dyck et al. (2007) on polar bears and climate change in Western Hudson Bay by Stirling et al. (2008). Ecological Complexity 5: 289–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elfström, M., Zedrosser, A., Støen, O.G. and other. 2014. Ultimate and proximate mechanisms underlying the occurrence of bears close to human settlements: review and management implications. Mammal Review 44: 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, J.D., Pearce, T., Duerden, F. and others. 2010. Climate change policy responses for Canada's Inuit population: the importance of and opportunities for adaptation. Global Environmental Change 20: 177–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, M.M.R. and Wenzel, G.W.. 2006. The nature and significance of polar bear conservation hunting in the Canadian Arctic. Arctic 59: 21–30.Google Scholar
Garnett, S.T., Crowley, G.M., Hunter-Xenie, H. and others. 2009. Transformative knowledge transfer through empowering and paying community researchers. Biotropica 41: 571–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gearhead, S. and Shirley, J.. 2007. Challenges in community-research relationships: learning from natural science in Nunavut. Arctic 60: 62–74.Google Scholar
Government of Nunavut. 2012. Western Hudson Bay aerial survey 2011 final report. Iqaluit: Department of Environment, Government of Nunavut. URL: http://env.gov.nu.ca/sites/default/files/wh_final_report_may_2012.pdf, [accessed 30 August 2016].Google Scholar
Gormezano, L.J. and Rockwell, R.F.. 2013a. Dietary composition and spatial patterns of polar bear foraging on land in western Hudson Bay. BMC Ecology 13: 51–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gormezano, L.J. and Rockwell, R.F.. 2013b. What to eat now? Shifts in polar bear diet during the ice-free season in western Hudson Bay. Ecology and Evolution 3: 3509–3523.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grimwood, B.S.R., Doubleday, N.C., Ljubicic, G.J. and others. 2012. Engaged acclimatization: towards responsible community-based participatory research in Nunavut. The Canadian Geographer 56: 211–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimwood, B.S.R. and Doubleday, N.C.. 2013. From river trails to adaptive co-management: learning and relating with Inuit inhabitants of the Thelon River, Canada. Indigenous Policy Journal 23 (4): 1–18.Google Scholar
Houde, N. 2007. The six faces of traditional ecological knowledge: challenges and opportunities for Canadian co-management arrangements. Ecology and Society 12: 34–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsieh, H.F. and Shannon, S.E.. 2005. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research 15: 1277–1288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huntington, H.P. 1998. Observations on the utility of the semi-directive interview for documenting traditional ecological knowledge. Arctic 51: 237–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntington, H.P. 2000. Using traditional ecological knowledge in science: methods and applications. Ecological Applications 10: 1270–1274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntington, H.P., Callaghan, T., Fox, S. and other. 2004. Matching traditional and scientific observations to detect environmental change: a discussion on arctic terrestrial ecosystems. Ambio 13: 18–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntington, H.P., Gearhead, S., Mahoney, A.R. and other. 2011. Integrating traditional and scientific knowledge through collaborative natural science field research: identifying elements for success. Arctic 64: 437–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
INAC (Indian and Northern Affairs Canada). 1993. Agreement between the Inuit of the Nunavut Settlement Area and Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada.Google Scholar
Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami and Nunavut Research Institute. 2007. Negotiating research relationships with Inuit communities: a guide for researchers. Ottawa and Iqaluit: Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami and Nunavut Research Institute.Google Scholar
Kaczensky, P., Huber, D., Knauer, F. and others. 2006. Activity patterns of brown bears (Ursus arctos) in Slovenia and Croatia. Journal of Zoology 269: 474–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keith, D. 2005. Inuit observations of changing sea ice and snow conditions in polar bear habitat in the east Kitikmeot, Nunavut. In: Freeman, M.M.R. and Foote, L. (editors). Inuit, polar bears and sustainable use: local, national and international perspectives. Edmonton: CCI Press: 111–124.Google Scholar
Kendrick, A. 2000. Community perceptions of the Beverly-Qamanirjuaq Caribou Management Board. The Canadian Journal of Native Studies 20 (1): 1–33.Google Scholar
Kotierk, M. 2010. The documentation of Inuit and public knowledge of Davis Strait polar bears, climate change, Inuit knowledge and environmental management using public opinion polls. Iqaluit: Department of Environment, Government of Nunavut. URL: http://env.gov.nu.ca/sites/default/files/davis_strait_public_opinion_report.pdf.Google Scholar
Kotierk, M. 2012. Public and Inuit interests, western Hudson Bay polar bears and wildlife management: results of a public opinion poll in western Hudson Bay communities. Iqaluit: Department of Environment, Government of Nunavut.Google Scholar
Kowalchuk, K.A. and Kuhn, R.G.. 2012. Mammal distribution in Nunavut: Inuit harvest data and COSEWIC's species at risk assessment process. Ecology and Society 17: 4–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lunn, N.J. and Stirling, I.. 1985. The significance of supplemental food to polar bears during the ice-free period of Hudson Bay. Canadian Journal of Zoology 63: 2291–2297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madison, J.S. 2008. Yosemite National Park: the continuous evolution of human-black bear conflict management. Human-Wildlife Interactions 2 (2): 160–167.Google Scholar
Marshall, M.M. 1996. Sampling for qualitative research. Family Practice 13: 522–525.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mercer, S.L., Green, L.W., Cargo, M. and others. 2008. Appendix C: reliability-tested guidelines for assessing participatory research projects. In: Minkler, M. and Wallerstein, N. (editors). Community-based participatory research for health: from process to outcomes, 2nd edition. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Messier, F. 2000. Effects of capturing, tagging, and radio collaring polar bears for research and management purposes in Nunavut and Northwest Territories. Nunavut, Department of Sustainable Development and University of Saskatchewan, Department of Biology: 128 pp.Google Scholar
Moller, H., Berkes, F., O'Brian, L.P. and other. 2004. Combining science and traditional ecological knowledge: monitoring populations for co-management. Ecology and Society 9: 2. URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss3/art2/, (accessed 30 August 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obbard, M.E., Thiemann, G.W., Peacock, E. and other. 2010. Proceedings of the 15th working meeting of the IUCN/SSC Polar Bear Specialist Group, Copenhagen, Denmark, 29 June–3 July 2009. Gland and Cambridge: IUCN: vii + 235 pp.Google Scholar
Pagano, A.M., Peacock, E., and McKinney, M.A.. 2014. Remote biopsy darting and marking of polar bears. Marine Mammal Science 30 (1): 169–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peacock, E., Derocher, A.E., Thiemann, G.W. and other. 2011. Conservation and management of Canada's polar bears (Ursus maritimus) in a changing Arctic. Canadian Journal of Zoology 89: 371–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, T.D., Ford, J.D., Laidler, G.J. and others. 2009. Community collaboration and climate change research in the Canadian Arctic. Polar Research 28: 10–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, T., Smit, B., Duerden, F. and others. 2010. Inuit vulnerability and adaptive capacity to climate change in Ulukhaktok, Northwest Territories, Canada. Polar Record 46: 157–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillipson, J., Lowe, P., Proctor, A. and other. 2012. Stakeholder engagement and knowledge exchange in environmental research. Journal of Environmental Management 95: 56–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Provencher, J.F., McEwan, M., Mallory, M.L. and others. 2013. How wildlife research can be used to promote wider community participation in the north. Arctic 66: 237–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, M.G. and McIlveen, K.. 2006. Toward a pluralistic civic science? Assessing community forestry. Society and Natural Resources: An International Journal 19: 591–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rockwell, R.F. and Gormezano, L.J.. 2009. The early bear gets the goose: climate change, polar bears and lesser snow geese in western Hudson Bay. Polar Biology 32: 539–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rode, K.D., Pagano, A.M., Bromaghin, J.F. and others. 2014. Effects of capturing and collaring on polar bears: findings from long-term research on the southern Beaufort Sea population. Wildlife Research 41: 311–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowe, G. and Frewer, L.J.. 2000. Public participation methods: a framework for evaluation. Science, Technology & Human Values 25: 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, R.H. 1975. The food habits of polar bears of James Bay and southwest Hudson Bay in summer and autumn. Arctic 28: 117–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stapleton, S., Atkinson, S., Hedman, H. and other. 2014. Revisiting western Hudson Bay: using aerial surveys to update polar bear abundance in a sentinel population. Biological Conservation 170: 38–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stapleton, S., Peacock, E. and Garshelis, D.. 2016. Aerial surveys suggest long-term stability in the seasonally ice-free Foxe Basin (Nunavut) polar bear population. Marine Mammal Science 32: 181–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stirling, I., Derocher, A.E., Gough, W.A. and other. 2008. Response to Dyck et al. (2007) on polar bears and climate change in western Hudson Bay. Ecological Complexity 5: 193–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stirling, I. and Parkinson, C.L.. 2006. Possible effects of climate warming on selected populations of polar bears (Ursus maritimus) in the Canadian Arctic. Arctic 59: 261–275.Google Scholar
Taylor, M.K., Laake, J., McLoughlin, P.D. and others. 2006. Demography and population viability of polar bears in Lancaster Sound and Norwegian Bay, Nunavut. Final Wildlife Report No. 9. Iqlauit: Department of Environment, Government of Nunavut: 29 pp.Google Scholar
Tester, F.J.T. and Irniq, P.. 2008. Inuit qaujimajatuqangit: social history, politics and the practice of resistance. Arctic 61: 48–61.Google Scholar
Thiemann, G.W., Iverson, S.J. and Stirling, I.. 2008a. Polar bear diets and arctic marine food webs: insights from fatty acid analysis. Ecological Monographs 78: 591–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thiemann, G.W., Derocher, A.E. and Sitrling, I.. 2008b. Polar bear Ursus maritimus conservation in Canada: an ecological basis for identifying designatable units. Oryx 42: 504–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thiemann, G.W., Derocher, A.E., Cherry, S.G. and others. 2013. Effects of chemical immobilization on the movement rates of free-ranging polar bears. Journal of Mammalogy 94: 386–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timpson, A.M. 2006. Stretching the concept of representative bureaucracy: the case of Nunavut. International Review of Administrative Sciences 72: 517–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tondu, J.M.E., Balasubramaniam, A.M., Chavarie, L. and others. 2014. Working with northern communities to build collaborative research partnerships: perspectives from early career researchers. Arctic 67: 419–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyrrell, M. 2006. More bears, less bears: Inuit and scientific perceptions of polar bear populations on the west coast of Hudson Bay. Études/Inuit/Studies 30 (2): 191–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyrell, M. 2009. West Hudson Bay polar bears: the Inuit perspective. In: Freeman, M.M.R. and Foote, L. (editors). Inuit, polar bears and sustainable use: local, national and international perspectives. Edmonton: CCI Press: 95–110.Google Scholar
Tyrell, M. and Clark, D.A.. 2014. What happened to climate change? CITES and the reconfiguration of polar bearxbrk conservation discourse. Global Environmental Change 24: 363–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Coeverden de Groot, P., Wong, P.B.Y., Harris, C. and others. 2013. Toward a non-invasive Inuit polar bear survey: genetic data from polar bear hair snags. Wildlife Society Bulletin 37: 394–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vongraven, D. and Peacock, E.. 2011. Development of a pan-Arctic monitoring plan for polar bears: background paper. Circumpolar Biodiversity Monitoring Programme, CAFF Monitoring Series Report No. 1, January 2011. Akureyi: CAFF International Secretariat.Google Scholar
Wenzel, G.W. 2004. From TEK to IQ: Inuit qaujimajatuqangit and Inuit cultural ecology. Arctic Anthropology 41: 238–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, G. 2006. Cultures in collision: traditional knowledge and Euro-Canadian governance processes in northern land-claim boards. Arctic 59: 401–414.Google Scholar
White, G. 2008. ‘Not the almighty’: evaluating Aboriginal influence in northern land-claim boards. Arctic 61: 71–85.Google Scholar
Wong, P.B.Y., van Coeverden de Groot, P., Fekken, C. and others. 2011. Interpretations of polar bear (Ursus maritimus) tracks by Inuit hunters: inter-rater reliability and inferences concerning accuracy. Canadian Field-Naturalist 125: 140–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, P.B.Y. and Murphy, R.W.. 2016. Inuit methods of identifying polar bear characteristics: potential for Inuit inclusion in polar bear surveys. Arctic 69: 40–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
York, J., Dowsley, M., Cornwell, A. and others. 2016. Demographic and traditional knowledge perspectives on the current status of Canadian polar bear subpopulations. Ecology and Evolution 6: 2897–2924.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed