Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-17T06:11:15.142Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Of men and instruments: The Norwegian Aurora Expedition to the Arctic, 1902–1903

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2018

Terje Brundtland
Terje Brundtland*
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, History, Religious Studies and Theology, University of Tromsø, 9037 Tromsø, Norway (terje.brundtland@uit.no)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In 1902, the Norwegian Professor Kristian Birkeland organised an expedition to the Arctic for studies of the aurora borealis, terrestrial magnetism and cirrus clouds. He established four stations at different locations—northern Norway, Iceland, Spitsbergen and Novaya Zemlya—all equipped with a similar set of scientific instruments. Using an extended concept of a scientific instrument, it is shown here that not only the instruments themselves, but also the external equipment, buildings and camp-facilities, as well as the manual work performed by the expedition members all played a role in obtaining the final results. Further, it is shown that Birkeland's efforts in organising and funding the expedition can be seen as an instrument-making operation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Polar Record , Volume 54 , Issue 1 , January 2018 , pp. 53 - 64
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baird, D. (2004). Thing Knowledge. A Philosophy of Scientific Instruments. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Birkeland, K. (1901). Letter to the Ministry of Church, 11 December 1901. Norwegian National Archives Eh-0576.Google Scholar
Birkeland, K. (1902). Letter to the Ministry of Church, 15 March 1902. Norwegian National Archives Eh-0576.Google Scholar
Birkeland, K. (1903a). Letter to the Ministry of Church, 24 August 1903. Norwegian Industrial Workers Museum. N-3660 Vemork, Norway.Google Scholar
Birkeland, K. (1903b). Letter to the Ministry of Church, 26 September 1903. Norwegian Industrial Workers Museum. N-3660 Vemork, Norway.Google Scholar
Birkeland, K. (1908). The Norwegian Aurora Polaris Expedition. Part I. Christiania: Aschehoug & Co.Google Scholar
Birkeland, K. (1913). The Norwegian Aurora Polaris Expedition. Part II. Christiania: Aschehoug & Co.Google Scholar
Brundtland, T. (1997). The Laboratory work of professor Kristian Birkeland, ISBN 82-90487-90-8. Tromsø: University of Tromsø. Birkeland's greatest terrella experiment, originally built in 1913, was restored by the author in 1995 and is now depicted on the Norwegian 200 kroner bank note. See: Brundtland, T. (1998). The Birkeland Terrella. Museum of the History of Science, University of Oxford. http://www.mhs.ox.ac.uk/about/sphaera/sphaera-issue-no-7/the-birkeland-terrella/ (accessed 11 September 2017).Google Scholar
Chapman, S., & Bartels, J. (1962). Geomagnetism. (Volume 1). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Egeland, A., & Burke, W. (2005). Kristian Birkeland, The First Space Scientist. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Egeland, A., & Burke, W. (2010). Kristian Birkeland's pioneering investigations of geomagnetic investigations. History of Geo- and Space Sciences, 1, 13–24.Google Scholar
Heilbron, J. L. (1999). The Sun in the Church. London: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helden, A. V., & Hankins, T. L. (1994). Introduction: Instruments in the history of science. Osiris, 9, 1–6.Google Scholar
Hiorter, O. (1747). ‘Om magnetnålens åtskilliga ändringar’. Kongl. Svenska Vetenskaps Academiens Handlinga, VIII, 27–43.Google Scholar
Knutsen, N., & Posti, P. (2002). La Recherche: en ekspedisjon mot nord - Une expédition vers le nord [La Recherche: An Expedition Towards the North]. Tromsø: Angelica.Google Scholar
Levere, T. (1993). Science and the Canadian Arctic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McPherron, R. L., Russell, C. T., & Aubry, M. P. (1973). Satellite studies of magnetospheric substorms. Journal of Geophysical Research, 78, 3131–3149.Google Scholar
Multhauf, P., & Good, G. (1987). A Brief History of Geomagnetism. Washington DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
Notes. (1903). Notes attached to the registration logs for the absolute magnetic measurements on Birkeland's expedition. Oslo: University of Oslo. In locker in room 153, the Department of Physics.Google Scholar
Poincare, H. (1905). Science and Hypothesis. London: The Walter Scott Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Ray, K. (2002). When human travelers become instruments. In: Bourguet, M.-N., Licoppe, C. & Sibum, H. O. (Eds). Instruments, Travel and Science (pp. 156–188). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Riddervold, H. (1961, December 19). ‘Dødens øyer’ [The Islands of Death]. Aftenposten. Oslo.Google Scholar
Roberts, P. (2011). The European Antarctic. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Russeltvedt, N. C. (1903). Diary by Nils Christian Russeltvedt 1902–1903. Property of Edith Øslebø, Kristiansand, Norway.Google Scholar
Rypdal, K., & Brundtland, T. (1997). The Birkeland terrella experiments and their importance for the modern synergy of laboratory and space plasma physics. Journal de Physique IV, 7 (C4), 113–132.Google Scholar
Sæland, S. (1907). Letter to Birkeland 8 July 1907. Oslo: Norwegian Museum for Science and Technology. NTM/A-1005 Birkeland, Kristian.Google Scholar
Schaanning, H. (1916a). Jægerliv Nordpaa. Christiania: Alb. Cammermeyers Forlag.Google Scholar
Schaanning, H. (1916b). Bidrag til Novaja Semljas fauna. Dansk Orientologisk Tidskrift, 10, 145–190.Google Scholar
Schaffer, S. (1993). Glass works. In: Gooding, D. (Ed.). The Uses of Experiments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schröder, W., & Wiederkehr, K. (2001). Geomagnetic research in the 19th century: a case study of the German contribution. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 63, 1649–1660.Google Scholar
Sibum, O. (1995). Reworking the mechanical value of heat: instruments of precision and gestures of accuracy in early Victorian England. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 26, 73–106.Google Scholar
Stortinget. (1902). Stortingsforhandlinger 1901–02 [Negotiations in the Parliament 1901–02], 89–90. Christiania. 683–715.Google Scholar
Swijtink, Z. G. (2000). Error theory. In: Hessenbruch, A. (Ed.). Reader's Guide to the History of Science (p. 226). London: Fitzroy Dearborn Publisher.Google Scholar
TGO. (2017). Tromsø Geophysical Observatory, Tromsø, Norway. http://geo.phys.uit.no (accessed 11 September 2017).Google Scholar
Toepfer, O., & Sohn (1907) Erdmagnetische Variations-Instrumente: Registrier-Apparate Hilfs-Instrumente. Potsdam, 31. Tromsø Museum − The University Museum. NO-9037 Tromsø.Google Scholar
Tønnessen, J. (1970). Norwegian Antarctic whaling, 1905–68: an historical appraisal. Polar Record, 15 (96), 283–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Umbreit, A. (2015). For a different solution on the problem of vibrations disturbing scientific instruments in the field, see the marble base specially build for the Repsold Circle that the Fiala expedition to Franz Josef Land (1905-03) borrowed from University of Kristiania. The places of Franz Josef Land: current visits and imagery. In: Capelotti, P. J. (Ed.). Proceedings of a Workshop on the Historic Place Names of Franz Josef Land, 3, 45–46. Tromsø: Septentrio Academic Publishing (University of Tromsø).Google Scholar
Warner, D. J. (1990). What is a scientific instrument? British Journal for the History of Science, 23, 83–93.Google Scholar