Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T13:05:09.842Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analysis of human impact on boreal vegetation around Monchegorsk, Kola peninsula, using automated remote sensing technique

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2011

E. Shipigina  and
W. G. Rees
E. Shipigina
Affiliation:
Scott Polar Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge, CB2 1ER (es377@cam.ac.uk)
W. G. Rees
Affiliation:
Scott Polar Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge, CB2 1ER (es377@cam.ac.uk)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The boreal vegetation of the sub-Arctic comprises more than 30% of the Earth's forest area and plays a major role in controlling the global environment. In the 20th century the boreal vegetation of Fennoscandia was significantly changed by heavy industrialisation leaving many forest areas damaged or dying. Due to severe climate conditions of the sub-Arctic such vegetation changes are traceable over long periods of time. This provides an opportunity to study all types of human impact on vegetation in time and to develop methods to monitor geographical and structural changes in the vegetation cover. Here we present the first part of a larger study in which we use the remote sensing technique to investigate the dynamics of the boreal vegetation in Fennoscandia in context of human impact. We have developed a novel method for an automated analysis and mapping of vegetation and of all types of human impact based on a single support-vector-machines classifier (for the whole area). Implemented with free and open source software the method uses Landsat TM and ETM+ band data (for which it automatically performs atmospheric correction) and a number of indices like NDVI, NBR, etc. The accuracy of the 16-class classification has been assessed using field data and literature sources and determined to be 74.1%. The method has been successfully applied to a study area around Monchegorsk, Kola peninsula, Russia, the most industrialised part of northern Europe. We have characterised all major types of human impact on the boreal forest and tundra vegetation performing the change detection analysis in an area of 1750 km2 between 1986 and 2005. The analysis has confirmed industrial atmospheric pollutions as the primary type of human impact here. We have discussed the role of forest fires and uncovered temporal trends in the vegetation cover. We have found that during the 19 years covered by the study more than one third of all coniferous forest in the area was transformed primarily to wetland, deciduous forest and typical tundra vegetation. The success of the method in this area allows us to extend the study to the rest of Fennoscandia and look at large scale changes in the boreal vegetation cover.

Type
Research Article
Information
Polar Record , Volume 48 , Special Issue 1: Papers from the 11th Circumpolar Remote Sensing Symposium , January 2012 , pp. 94 - 106
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ACIA. (Arctic Climate Impact Assessment). 2005. Arctic climate impact assessment 2005. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
AMAP. (Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme). 1997. Arctic pollution issue: a state of the Arctic environment report. Oslo: AMAP.Google Scholar
AMAP. (Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme). 2006. Arctic pollution: acidification and Arctic haze. Oslo: AMAP.Google Scholar
Bonan, G., Pollard, D., and Thompson, S.. 1992a. Effects of boreal forest vegetation on global climate. Nature 359:716–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, K., Winne, C., Redmond, R, Opitz, D., and Mangrich, M.. 2005. Classifying and mapping wildfire severity: a comparison of methods. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 71 (11):1311–1320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buhmann, M. 2003. Radial basis functions: theory and Implementations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, C.-C., and Lin, C.-J.. 2001. LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines. URL: http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~cjlin/libsvm (accessed 15 March 2010).Google Scholar
Chavez, P. 1996. Image-based atmospheric corrections– revised and improved. Photogrametric Engineering and Remote Sensing 62 (9): 1025–1036.Google Scholar
Doncheva, A. 1978. Landshaft v zone vozdeystviya promishlennosty [Landscape in industrial impact zone]. Moskva: Lesnaya promishlennost’.Google Scholar
Dozier, J. 1984. Snow reflectance from Landsat-4 Thematic Mapper. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing GE22 (3):323–328.Google Scholar
Dozier, J. 1989. Spectral signature of Alpine snow cover from the Landsat Thematic Mapper. Remote Sensing of Environment 28:9–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FAO. (Food and Agricultural Organization). 2002. Global forest resources assessment 2001. Main report. Rome: UN Food and Agriculture Organization (forestry paper 140).Google Scholar
Gao, B.-C. 1996. NDWI– a normalized difference water index for remote sensing of vegetation liquid water from space. Remote Sensing of Environment 58: 257–266.Google Scholar
Glazovskaya, M., and Kasimov, N.. 1987. Landshaphtno-geohimicheskie osnovi phonovogo monitoringa prirodnoy sredy. [Geochemistry basis of environmental monitoring]. Vestnik Moscovskogo Universiteta 1:11–17.Google Scholar
Golubeva, E., Kapitza, A., Kravtsova, V., Krasnushkin, A., Lur'e, I., Malyshev, V., Rees, G., Tutubalina, O., Govorova, A., Karpova, N., Morozova, O., Nikolaeva, E., Ressle, A., Snakina, A., and Williams, M.. 2003. Ekologiya severa: distantsionnie metody narushennih ecosistem [Ecology of the north: remote sensing of ecosystem disturbance (case study of Kola Peninsula)]. Moskva: Nauchniy mir.Google Scholar
Hofgaard, A. 2004. Feedbacks between northern terrestrial ecosystems and climate. Polar Research 124:23–25.Google Scholar
Hofgaard, A., Rees, G., Tømmervik, H., Tutubalina, O., Golubeva, E., Lukina, N., Høgda, K., Karlsen, S.-R., Isaeva, L., and Kharuk, V.. 2010. Role of disturbed vegetation in mapping the boreal zone in northern Eurasia. Applied Vegetation Science 13 (4): 460–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iqbal, M. 1983. An introduction to solar radiation. Toronto: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ives, A., and Carpenter, S.. 2007. Stability and diversity of ecosystems. Science 317 (5834):58–62.Google Scholar
Jensen, J. 2007. Remote sensing of the environment: an earth resource perspective. 2nd ed.Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Johansen, B., and Karlsen, S.-R.. 2005. Monitoring vegetation changes on Finnmarksvidda, Northern Norway, using Landsat MSS and Landsat TM/ETM +satellite images. Phytocoenologia 35 (4): 969–984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karpenko, A. 1994. Vliyanie promishlennogo zagryazneniya n elovie lesa Laplandskogo zapovednika za period 1981–1994 [Influence of industrial pollution on spruce forests of the Lapland nature reserve for the period 1981–1994]. Monchegorsk: Fondy Laplandskogo zapovednika.Google Scholar
Key, C., and Benson, N.. 2006. Landscape assessment: sampling and analysis methods. In: Lutes, D., Keane, R., Caratti, J., Key, C., Benson, N., Sutherland, S., and Gangi, L. (editors). FIREMON: fire effects monitoring and inventory systems. Ogden: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Department of Agricultural, Forest Service (general technical report): LA1–51.Google Scholar
Kola, GMK. 2005. Egegodnik Kol'skoy GMK [Annual report of the Kola Company]. Murmansk: Parahod.Google Scholar
Kruchkov, V. 1991. Predel'nie antropogennie nagruzki i sostoyanie ecosistem Severa [Extreme anthropogenic stress and state of the northern ecosystems]. Ecologiya 3:15–26.Google Scholar
Kruchkov, V. 1993. Extreme anthropogenic loads and the northern ecosystem condition. Ecological Application 3 (4): 622–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruchkov, V., and Makarova, T.. 1989. Aerotehnogennoe vozdeistvie na ecosistemy Kol'skogo Severa [Airtechnogenic influence on ecosystems of Kola north]. Apatity: Kol'skiy Filial Academii Nauk SSSR.Google Scholar
Kruchkov, V., and Syroid, N.. 1984. Pochvenno-botanicheskiy monitoring v tsentral'noy chasty Kol'skogo poluostrova [Soil-botanic monitoring in the central part of the Kola Peninsula]. In: Monitoring Prirodnoy Sredy Kolskogo Severa [Monitoring of natural environment on Kola North]. Apatity: Kol'skiy Filial Academii Nauk SSSR: 4–15.Google Scholar
Lillesand, T., and Kiefer, R.. 2000. Remote sensing and image interpretation. New York: John Wileyand Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Lukina, N., and Nikonov, V.. 1993. Sostoyanie elovih biogeotcenozov Severa v usloviyah tehnogennogo zagryaznniya [State of the northern spruce ecosystems in conditions of industrial pollution]. Apatity: Kol'skiy Nauchniy Tsentr.Google Scholar
Lukina, N., Suhareva, T., and Isaeva, L.. 2005. Tehnogennie digressii I vostanovitel'nie suctcesii v severotaeghnih lesah [Technogenic digression and recultivation successions in the northern-taiga forests]. Moskva: Nauka.Google Scholar
Markham, B., and Barker, J.. 1986. Landsat MSS and TM post-calibration dynamic ranges, exoatmospheric reflectance and at-satellite temperatures. EOSAT Technical Notes 1:3–8.Google Scholar
Marsh, W., and Grossa, J.. 2002. Environment geography: science, land use and earth systems. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
McLachlan, G., Do, K.-A., and Ambroise, C.. 2004. Analyzing microarray gene expression data. Hoboken: J. Wiley and Sons, Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melillo, J., McGuire, A., Kicklighter, D., Moore, B., Vorosmarty, C., and Schloss, A.. 1993. Global climate change and terrestrial net primary production. Nature 63:234–240.Google Scholar
Meyer, D., Leisch, F., and Hornik, K.. 2003. The support vector machine under test. Neurocomputing 55:169–186.Google Scholar
Miller, J., and Yool, S.. 2002. Mapping forest post-fire canopy consumption in several overstory types using multi-temporal Landsat TM and ETM data. Remote Sensing of Environment 82:481–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nikonov, V., Lukina, N., Isaeva, L., Gorbacheva, T., and Belova, E.. 2005. Vosstanovlenie territoriy narushennyh zagryazneniem medno-nikelevogo proizvodstva na Kol'skom poluostrove [Recultivation of damaged areas by copper-nickel industry on Kola Peninsula]. In: Kalinnikov, V., Masloboev, V., and Efimov, B. (editors). Innovatsionniy potentsial Kol'skoy Nauki [Innovation potential of Kola science]. Apatity: Kol'skiy Nauchniy Tsentr.Google Scholar
Panin, G., Vyruchalkina, T., and Solomonova, I.. 2008. Analis klimaticheskih tendentsiy v vysokih shirotah severnogo polushariya [Analysis of climate tendencies in high latitude of northern hemisphere]. Izvestiya RAN Seriya Geographicheskaya 6:31–41.Google Scholar
Rees, G., and Danks, F.. 2007. Derivation and assessment of vegetation maps for reindeer pasture analysis in Arctic European Russia. Polar Record 43: 290–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rees, G., and Williams, M.. 1997. Monitoring changes in land cover induced by atmospheric pollution in the Kola Peninsula, Russia, using Landsat-MSS data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 18: 1703–1723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rees, G., Williams, M., and Vitebsky, P.. 2003. Mapping land cover change in a reindeer herding are of Russian Arctic using Landsat TM and ETM+ imagery and indigeous knowledge. Remote Sensing of Environment 85:441–452.Google Scholar
Shugart, H., Leemans, R., and Bonan, G.. 1992. A system analysis of the global boreal forest. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shutova, E., Wielgolaski, F., Karlsen, S.-R., Makarova, O., Berlina, N., Filimonova, T., Haraldsson, E., Aspholm, P., Flø, L., and Høgda, K.. 2006. Growing seasons of nordic mountain birch in northernmost Europe as indicated by long-term field studies and analyses of satellite images. International Journal of Biometeorology 51:155–166.Google Scholar
Singh, A. 1989. Digital change detection techniques using remotely-sensed data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 10 (6):989–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smithson, P., Addison, K., and Atkinson, K.. 2002. Fundamentals of the physical environment. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Solheim, I., Tømmervik, H., and Høgda, K.. 1995. A time study of the vegetation in Monchegorsk, Russia. Tromsø: NORUT Information Technology Ltd.Google Scholar
Strahler, A., and Strahler, A.. 2005. Physical geography: science and systems of the human environment. Hoboken: John Wiley&Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Svetlosanov, V. 2009. Ustoychivost’ prirodnyh sistem k antropogennym i prirodnym vozdeystviyam [Stability of natural systems to human and natural influences]. Moscow: Laboratoriya sneghnyh lavin.Google Scholar
Tømmervik, H., Høgda, K., and Solheim, I.. 2003. Monitoring vegetation changes in Pasvik (Norway) and Pechenga in Kola Peninsula (Russia) using multitemporal Landsat MSS/TM data. Remote Sensing of Environment 85:370–388.Google Scholar
Tømmervik, H., Johansen, B., and Pedersen, J.. 1995. Monitoring the effects of air pollutions on terrestrial ecosystems in Varanger (Norway) and Nikel-Pechenga (Russia) using remote sensing. The Science of the Total Environment 160/161: 753–767.Google Scholar
Tømmervik, H., Johansen, B., Tombre, I., Thannheiser, D., Høgda, K., Gaare, E., and Wielgolaski, F.. 2004. Vegetation change in the Nordic mountain birch forest: the influence of grazing and climate change. Arctic, Antarctic and Alpine Research 36 (3):323–332.Google Scholar
Toutoubalina, O., and Rees, G. 1999. Remote sensing of industrial impact on Arctic vegetation around Noril'sk, northern Siberia: preliminary results. International Journal of Remote Sensing 20: 2979–2990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UNEP. (United Nations Environment Programme). 2005. One planet many people: atlas of our changing environment. Nairobi: UNEP.Google Scholar
USGS. (U.S. Geological Survey). 2010. The Landsat-7 science data user's handbook. Greenbelt: Landsat Project Science Office. (NASA Goddard flight space center).Google Scholar
Virtanen, T., Mikkola, K., and Nikula, A.. 2004. Satellite image based vegetation classification of a large area using limited ground reference data: a case study in the Usa Basin, north-east European Russia. Polar Research 23 (1):51–66.Google Scholar
Yakovlev, B. 1961. Klimat Murmanskoy oblasti [Climate of the Murmansk region]. Murmansk: Murmanskoe knighnoe izdanie.Google Scholar
Yarnishko, V. (editor). 2005. Problemi ekologii rastitel'nih soobchestv [Environmental problems of vegetation]. St Petersburg: VVM.Google Scholar
Zhirov, K., Golubeva, E., Govorova, A., and Haitbaev, A.. 2007. Structurno-funktsional'nie izmeneniya rastitel'nosti v usloviyah technogennogo zagryazneniya na Krainem severe [Structural and functional vegetation changes in conditions of technogenic pollution in the extreme north]. Moskva: Nauka.Google Scholar