Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T04:56:01.070Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The ANCSA Amendments of 1987 and land management in Alaska

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

Nicholas E. Flanders
Affiliation:
Center for Northern Studies, Wolcott, Vermont 05680 USA

Abstract

The original Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act, passed in 1971, gave Alaska Native corporations fee simple title to 18 million hectares of Alaskan land. Within a few years of its passage, however, Alaska Natives grew concerned that this land would be lost through mismanagement of the corporations or forced into development by property taxation. Because large numbers of Alaska Natives depend upon subsistence hunting and fishing, the loss of the land, or its use for activities incompatible with subsistence, could have been devastating. Amendments of 1987 (PL 100–241) protect Native corporation land by placing all undeveloped land in a land bank and allowing for the formation of ‘Settlement Trusts“. More importantly, Congress recognized that the Native subsistence economy and culture are significant factors in the management of Native lands.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alaska Department of Natural Resources. 1986. Northwest area plan, draft subsistence resource report, November 1986. Fairbanks, Alaska Department of Natural Resources.Google Scholar
Alaska Federation of Natives. 1988. 1991: Making it work: a guide to Public Law 100–241, 1987 Amendments to the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act. Anchorage, Alaska Federation of Natives.Google Scholar
Alaska Native Review Commission. 1984. Transcript of proceedings, Vol. IV, ANCSA institutions and legal regimes. Anchorage, Inuit Circumpolar Conference, Alaska Office.Google Scholar
Anders, , Gary, . 1983. The role of Alaska Native corporations in the development of Alaska. Development and Change 14: 555–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, , Robert, D. and others. 1978. Alaska Native land claims. Anchorage, Alaska Native Foundation.Google Scholar
Bee, , Robert, and Gingerich, R. 1977. Colonialism, classes, and ethnic identity: native Americans and the national political economy. Studies in Comparative International Development 12: 7093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, , Thomas, R. 1985. Village journey: the report of the Alaska Native Review Commission. New York, Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Case, , David, . 1984. Alaska natives and American laws. Fairbanks, University of Alaska Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, , Felix, . 1942. Handbook of federal Indian law. Washington, US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Cooley, , Richard, A. 1984. Evolution of Alaska land policy. In: Morehouse, T. (editor). Alaska Resources Development. Boulder, Westview Press: 1349.Google Scholar
Dyck, Noel. 1987. Aboriginal peoples and nation-states: an introduction to analytic issues. In: Dyck, N. (editor). Indigenous people and the nation-state: fourth world olitics in Canada, Australia, and Norway. St. John's: Memorial University of Newfoundland, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Social and Economic Papers No. 14: 126.Google Scholar
Edwardsen, Charles Jr, 1974. The new harpoon: an essay. In: Gallagher, H. G.Etok: A study in Eskimo power. New York, Putnam.Google Scholar
Fienup-Riordan, Ann. 1984. The spirit of ANCSA: native aspirations and the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act. In: Papers prepared for overview roundtable discussions, Alaska Native Review Commission, February 27-March 16, 1984. Anchorage, Inuit Circumpolar Conference, Alaska Office.Google Scholar
Flanders, Nicholas E. 1989. The Alaska Native corporation as conglomerate: the problem of profitability. Human Organization (in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, Thomas J. 1988. Native participation in land management planning in Alaska. Arctic 41: 9198.Google Scholar
Haida Corporation. 1988. In re: Haida Corporation, Amended Plan of Reorganization and Haida permanent fund agreement (confirmed). Anchorage, US Bankruptcy Courtforthe District of Alaska, Case Number5X-85–00007, 19 July 1988.Google Scholar
Jantscher, D. 1967. Trusts and estate taxation. Washington, Brookings Institute.Google Scholar
Jenness, Diamond. 1962. Eskimo administration: I. Alaska. Montreal, Arctic Institute of North America. (Technical Paper No. 10).Google Scholar
Kruse, John A. 1986. Subsistence and the North Slope Inupiat: the effects of energy development. In: Langdon, S. (editor). Contemporary Alaskan native economics. Lanham, MD, University Press of America: 121–52.Google Scholar
McClanahan, A. J. 1986. AFN withdraws 1991 amendments. Tundra Times, 29 September 1986: 1.Google Scholar
Murphy, Robert F. and Steward, J. H. 1956. Tappers and trappers: parallel processes in acculturation. Economic Development and Cultural Change 4: 335–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilkington, Steve. 1987. Senate passes 1991 bill unanimously. Tundra Times, 2 November 1987: 1, 5.Google Scholar
Slitor, Richard E. 1974. Taxation and land use. In: Harriss, C. L. (editor). The good earth of America: planning our land use. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall: 6787.Google Scholar
Thomas, M. E. 1986. The Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act: conflict and controversy. Polar Record 23: 2736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, M. E. 1988. The Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act: an update. Polar Record 24: 328–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
US Senate, Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. 1987. Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act Amendments of 1987, report with additional views, Senate report no. 100–201, 100th Congress, first session. Washington, US Senate, Cttee. on Natural Resources.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Robert J. 1986. The economic efficiency of food production in a western Eskimo population. In: Langdon, S. (editor). Contemporary Alaskan Native economies. Lanham, Maryland: University Press of America: 101–20.Google Scholar