Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T16:51:01.121Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Building collaborative networks across disciplines: A review of polar educators international’s first five years

Part of: Celebrating IPY Education, Outreach and Engagement – 10 years on

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 March 2019

Heidi A. Roop ,
Gary Wesche ,
Patrícia F. Azinhaga ,
Betty Trummel  and
José C. Xavier
Heidi A. Roop*
Affiliation:
Climate Impacts Group, University of Washington, PO Box 355674, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
Gary Wesche
Affiliation:
Polar Educators International, Fairbanks, AK, USA
Patrícia F. Azinhaga
Affiliation:
Institute of Education, University of Lisbon, Alameda da Universidade, 1649-013 Lisboa, Portugal
Betty Trummel
Affiliation:
The Science Roadshow, Harwich, MA, USA
José C. Xavier
Affiliation:
Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, Department of Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
*
Author for correspondence: Heidi A. Roop, Email: hroop@uw.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Polar Educators International (PEI) is a volunteer-based organization designed to build collaborative relationships between educators and polar researchers. Founded in 2012, PEI was created out of the networks formed during the International Polar Year 2007–2008. This paper explores PEI’s first five years (2012–17) of successes, challenges and opportunities that have led to the creation of an organization with over 1,500 members. Using a ‘level of participation’ framework for communities of practice, we examine the evolution of this educator-researcher network and focus on two key questions: 1) who has PEI reached and served over this time?, and 2) what are barriers to participation? Barriers include sustained engagement with researchers and establishing value within institutional frameworks that generally undervalue activities referred to as ‘education and outreach’ (EOC). EOC activities continue to be perceived as extra-curricular in both educator and researcher communities. Working to deepen collaboration with polar researchers and targeting a greater diversity of PEI’s membership to fill core leadership functions should be future areas of focus for PEI as it looks to continue to shape polar EOC. Advancing and enhancing polar EOC extends well beyond PEI and should be a priority for the broader polar science and education communities.

Keywords

Community of practiceInternational Polar YearPolar educationScience communicationScience education
Type
Research Note
Information
Polar Record , Volume 55 , Issue 4 , July 2019 , pp. 220 - 226
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allison, I., Béland, M., Alverson, K., Bell, R., Carlson, D., Cutler, P., … Yamanouchi, T. (2009). The state of polar research. Geneva, Switzerland: World Meteorological Organization.Google Scholar
Brooks, C. (2010). Toward ‘hybridised’ faculty development for the twenty-first century: Blending online communities of practice and face-to-face meetings in instructional and professional support programmes. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 5(3), 261–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Illingworth, S. & Roop, H.A. (2015). Developing key skills as a science communicator: Case studies of two scientists-led outreach programmes. Geosciences, 5(1), 2–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, B., Zicus, S., & Allen, B. (2010). Polar science and global climate: An international resource for education & outreach. Essex, UK: Pearson Custom Publishing.Google Scholar
Krupnik, I., Allison, I., Bell, R., Cutler, P., Hik, D., López-Martinez, J., … Summerhayes, C. (2011). Understanding earth’s polar challenges: International polar year 2007–2008. Vol. 1. Alberta, Canada: University of the Arctic, Rovaniemi, Finland/CCI Press.Google Scholar
Marcum-Dietrich, N., Marquez, L., Gill, S.E., & Medved, C. (2011). No teacher left inside: Preparing a new generation of teachers. Journal of Geoscience Education, 59, 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, I., Huffman, L.T., Xavier, J.C., & Walton, D.W.H. (2014). Education and polar research: Bringing polar science into the classroom. Journal of Geological Resource and Engineering, 4, 217–221.Google Scholar
Polar Educators International. (2018). About polar educators international. Retrieved from https://polareducator.org/about-pei/mission/Google Scholar
Provencher, J., Baeseman, J., Carlson, D., Badhe, R., Bellman, J., Hik, D., … Zicus, S., (2011). Polar research education, outreach and communication during the fourth IPY: How the 2007–2008 international polar year has contributed to the future of education, outreach and communication. Paris, France: International Council for Science (ICSU).Google Scholar
Rapley, C., Bell, R. & the ICSU IPY 2007–2008 Planning Group. (2004). A framework for the international polar year 2007–2008. Paris, France: ICSU.Google Scholar
Salmon, R.A., Carlson, D., Zicus, S., Pauls, M., Baeseman, J., Sparrow, E.B., … Raymond, M. (2011). Education, outreach and communication during the International Polar Year 2007–2008: Stimulating a global polar community. The Polar Journal, 1, 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty. (2014). Final report of the thirty-seventh Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting. Brasilia. 28 April - 7 May 2014. Retrieved December 26, 2017, from https://www.ats.aq/documents/ATCM37/fr/ATCM37_fr001_e.pdfGoogle Scholar
Wenger-Trayner, E., & Wegner-Trayner, B. (2011). Levels of participation. Retrieved June 23, 2018, from http://wenger-trayner.com/resources/slide-forms-of-participation/Google Scholar
Wenger-Trayner, E., & Wegner-Trayner, B. (2015). Communities of practice: A brief introduction. Self-published. Retrieved June 15, 2018, from http://wenger-trayner.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/07-Brief-introduction-to-communities-of-practice.pdfGoogle Scholar