No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
A comparative analysis of the settlements of Novoye Chaplino and Gambell
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 October 2009
Abstract
Geographically separated by only 64 km, the Siberian Yupik-speaking communities of Gambell and Novoye Chaplino have endured a politically mandated separation of 40 years. During this period these two small, native comm unities have experienced enormous changes, changes often engendered by the social and economic policies of their nation states. The abandonment of small, native communities in Chukotka under the Soviet policy of ‘settlements without prospects’, the forced resettlement of Chaplino to Novoye Chaplino, and the reorganization of cooperatives into state farms have all had serious detrimental consequences for the organization of subsistence activities in this community. Gambell—with very little economic infrastructure, high unemployment, increased social problems, and some federaland state-mandated management of their natural resources — has managed to maintain high levels of subsistence production. The native language is spoken by youngsters in Gambell but not in Novoye Chaplino. Other important cultural features such as sharing, bride service, and ivory carving have been maintained in Gambell but have been lost in Novoye Chaplino. Contacts between the two communities under the recent policy of glasnost' may bring a revival of these practices back to Novoye Chaplino.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993
References
Alaska Department of Labor. 1986. Statistical Quarterly. Juneau: Alaska Department of Labor, Research and Analysis Section.Google Scholar
Braund, S.R., and Institute of Social and Economic Research, University of Alaska. 1989. North Slope sub-sistence study: Wainwright 1988. Anchorage: US Department of the Interior, Minerals Management Service, Alaska Outer Continental Shelf Social and Economic Studies Program, Technical Report 136.Google Scholar
Braund, S.R., Stoker, S.W., and Kruse, J.A.. 1988. Ouanti fication of subsistence and cultural need for bowhead whales by Alaska Eskimos. Anchorage: Stephen R. Braund & Associates.Google Scholar
Burch, E.S. Jr, 1975. Eskimo kinsmen: changing family relationships in northwest Alaska. St Paul: West Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Burgess, S.N. 1974. The St Lawrence islanders of Northwest Cape: patterns of resource utilization. Unpublished Ph.D dissertation, University of Alaska Fairbanks.Google Scholar
Callaway, D.G. 1990. The persistence of subsistence and the status of native elderly in Alaska communities. Anchorage: US Department of the Interior, Minerals Management Service, Alaska Outer Continental Shelf Environmental Studies Program, Conference Proceedings, Third Information Transfer Meeting.Google Scholar
Fay, F.H. 1981. Walrus. In: Ridgway, S.H., and Harrison, R.J. (editors). Handbook of marine mammals, Vol. 1. New York: Academic Press 1–23.Google Scholar
Galginaitis, M. 1984. Ethnographic study and monitoring methodology of contemporary economic growth, sociocultural change, andcommunitydevelopmentin Nuiqsut, Alaska. Anchorage: US Department of the Interior, Minerals Management Service, Alaska Outer Continental Shelf Social and Economic Studies Program, Technical Report 96.Google Scholar
Hughes, C.C. 1965. Underfourf lags: recent culture change among the Eskimos. Current Anthropology 6 (1): 3–69.Google Scholar
Krupnik, I.I. 1987. The bowhead vs. the gray whale in Chukotkan aboriginal whaling. Arctic 40 (1): 16–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luton, H.H. 1986. Wainwright, Alaska:the making of Inupiat cultural continuity in atime of change. Ph.D dissertation, University of Michigan. Ann Arbor: University Microfilm.Google Scholar
Malloy, J. 1982. Draft progress report: 1982 walrus harvest, health and welfare study at Gambell, Alaska. Anchorage: US Fish and Wildlife Service.Google Scholar
Nelson, R.K. 1969. Hunters of the northern ice. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, R.K. 1982. Harvest of the sea: coastal subsistence in modem Wain wright. Barrow: North Slope Borough.Google Scholar
Nuttall, M. 1992. Arctic homeland: kinship, community, and development in northwest Greenland. London: Belhaven Press; Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Robbins, L.A., and Little, R.L.. 1984. Effects of renewable resource harvest disruptions on socioeconomic and sociocultural systems: St Lawrence Island. Anchorage: US Department of the Interior, Minerals Management Service, Alaska Outer Contiental Shelf Social and Economic Studies Program, Technical Report 89.Google Scholar
Smolyak, A.V. 1957. Materialy k kharakteristike sotsialisticheskoy kultury i obraza zhizni korennogo naseleniya Chukotskogo rayona [Material on the characteristics of the socialist culture and mode of life of the native population of the Chukchi region]. Moscow and Leningrad: Sibirskii Ethnographicheskii Sbornik II.Google Scholar
Spencer, R.F. 1959. The north Alaskan Eskimo, a study in ecology and society. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, US Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 171.Google Scholar
US Department of the Interior. 1988. Village economies in rural Alaska. Anchorage: US Department of the Interior, Minerals Management Service, Alaska Outer Continental Shelf Social and Economic Studies Program, Technical Report 132.Google Scholar
Waring, K., and Smythe, G.. 1989. A demographic and employment analysis of selected Alaska rural communities. Anchorage: US Department of the Interior, Minerals Management Service, Alaska Outer Continental Shelf Social and Economic Studies Program, Technical Report 137.Google Scholar
Worl, R. 1979. Sociocultural assessment of the impact of the 1978 International Whaling Commission quota on the Eskimo communities. Anchorage: University of Alaska, Arctic Environmental Information and Data Center.Google Scholar