Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-j5c6p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-09T14:29:20.655Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Concluding commentary: Inter-disciplinary vistas – research on Svalbard in a local to global continuum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2023

Mathias Albert Open the ORCID record for Mathias Albert [Opens in a new window]
Mathias Albert*
Affiliation:
Bielefeld University
*
Author for correspondence: Mathias Albert, Email: mathias.albert@uni-bielefeld.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Keywords

SvalbardInterdisciplinarityStruturesFlowsProcesses
Type
Commentary
Information
Polar Record , Volume 59 , 2023 , e4
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersen, T. (2022). Negotiating trade-offs between the environment, sustainability and mass tourism amongst guides on Svalbard. Polar Record, 58. doi: 10.1017/S0032247422000080.Google Scholar
Arlov, T.B. (1994). A Short History of Svalbard. Oslo: Norsk Polarinstitutt (2nd ed.).Google Scholar
Avango, D., Hacquebord, L., Aalders, Y., de Haas, H., Gustafsson, U., & Kruse, F. (2011). Between markets and geo-politics: natural resource exploitation on Spitsbergen from 1600 to the present day. Polar Record, 47(1), 2939.Google Scholar
Brode-Roger, D. (2022). The Svalbard Treaty and identity of place: Impacts and implications for Longyearbyen, Svalbard. Polar Record, in press.Google Scholar
Chekin, L. S., & Rogatchevski, A. (editors) (2020). Svalbard Studies (Special Issue of Nordlit, No. 45).Google Scholar
Churchill, R., & Ulfstein, G. (2010). The disputed maritime zones around Svalbard. In Nordquist, M., Moore, J. N., & Heidar, T. H. (Eds.), Changes in the Arctic Environment and the Law of the Sea (pp. 551–593). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Duda, P., Kelman, I., Glick, N., Sokolenko, V., Poussenkova, N., & Nikitina, E. (2022). Disaster risk perceptions and multinational cooperation in Barentsburg, Svalbard. Polar Record, 58. doi: 10.1017/S003224742200002X Google Scholar
Holtsmark, S. G. (1994). Soviet strategic interests in Norway: Svalbard and the northern borderlands. IFS Info 7/1994 (Norwegian Institute for Defence Studies): 12-16.Google Scholar
Hovelsrud, G., Kaltenborn, B.P., & Olsen, J. (2020). Svalbard in transition: adaptation to cross-scale changes in Longyearbyen. The Polar Journal, 10(2), 420–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hovelsrud, G., Veland, S., Kaltenborn, B., Olsen, J., & Dannevig, H. (2021). Sustainable Tourism in Svalbard: Balancing economic growth, sustainability, and environmental governance. Polar Record, 57. doi: 10.1017/S0032247421000668 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kavan, J., & Halašková, B. (2022). The rise and fall of Pyramiden: The story of a town in a wider geopolitical and environmental context. Polar Record, 58. doi: 10.1017/S0032247422000018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotašková, E. (2022). From mining tool to tourist attraction: Cultural heritage as a materialised form of transformation in Svalbard society. Polar Record, 58. doi: 10.1017/S0032247422000092 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Cour, E. (2022). Geo-Aesthetical Discontent Svalbard, the Guide and Post-Future Essayism. Gothenburg: Göteborgs Universitet.Google Scholar
Meyer, A. (2022). Physical and feasible: Climate change adaptation in Longyearbyen, Svalbard. Polar Record, 58. doi: 10.1017/S0032247422000079 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Middleton, A. (2022). Norwegian and Russian settlements on Svalbard: Analysis of demographic and socio-economic trends. Polar Record, in press.Google Scholar
Ødegaard, C. V. (2022). Returning to nature. Post-carbon utopias in Svalbard, Norway. Social Analysis: The International Journal of Anthropology, 66(2), 1–22.Google Scholar
Olsen, J., Vlakhov, A., & Wigger, K. (2022). Barentsburg and Longyearbyen in times of socioeconomic transition: Residents’ perceptions of community viability. Polar Record, 58. doi: 10.1017/S0032247422000043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pram Gad, U., & Strandsbjerg, J. (editors) (2019). The Politics of Sustainability in the Arctic. Reconfiguring Identity, Space, and Time. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs (2020). Letter by the Russian to the Norwegian Minister of Foreign Affairs. https://www.mid.ru/web/guest/maps/no/-/asset_publisher/f4MKo6byouc4/content/id/4019093?p_p_id=101_INSTANCE_f4MKo6byouc4&_101_INSTANCE_f4MKo6byouc4_languageId=en_GB (last accessed 08 December 2020).Google Scholar
Saville, S. (2022). Valuing time: Tourism transitions in Svalbard. Polar Record, 58. doi: 10.1017/S0032247422000055 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokolickova, Z. (2022). The trouble with local community in Longyearbyen, Svalbard: How big politics and lack of fellesskap hinder a not-yet-decided future. Polar Record, 58. doi: 10.1017/S0032247422000286 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokolickova, Z., Meyer, A., & Vlakhov, A. (2022). Changing Svalbard: Tracing interrelated socio-economic and environmental change in remote Arctic settlements. Polar Record, 58. doi: 10.1017/S0032247422000213 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, P. E., Tasch, J., Gerhard, H., Keul, A., & Nyman, E.A. (2015). Contesting the Arctic. Politics and Imaginaries in the Circumpolar North. London: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar
Ulfstein, G. (1995). The Svalbard Treaty. From terra nullius to Norwegian Sovereignty. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.Google Scholar
Viken, A. (2008). The Svalbard transit scene. In Bærenholdt, J. O. & Granås, B. (Eds.), Mobility and Place. London: Ashgate: 139154.Google Scholar