Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T04:56:41.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Daytime aurora observed from Spitsbergen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

D. A. R. Simmons  and
K. Henriksen
D. A. R. Simmons
Affiliation:
21 Dougalston Avenue, Milngavie, Scotland
K. Henriksen
Affiliation:
The Auroral Observatory, University of TromsФ, N-9001 TromsФ, Norway
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Daytime (or dayside cleft) aurora is almost a permanent feature of the midday skies over Spitsbergen during the continuous darkness of the polar night It was observed in one or other of its characteristic forms around geomagnetic noon on 58 of 59 clear day sduring the wintersof 1987/1988, 1990/1991, and 1992/1993. The three types of day time aurora were studied by visual, colour photographic, and interference-filter techniques to confirm the precise nature of the observed emissions. Prenoon aurora, which is characterised by diffuse, patchy, green aurora at 557.7 nm, was observed on 42 occasions. It is generated by low-energy electrons of less than 300 eV coming through the entry layer of the dayside cleft. Noontime aurora, which consists largely of pure red emissions at 630.0/636.4 nm, was observed on 50 occasions. It is generated by high-flux, very low-energy electrons of 10–50 eV flowing directly from the solar wind through the polar cusp. Postnoon aurora, which is characterised by discrete, green auroral arcs at 557.7 nm, was also observed on 42 occasions. Like prenoon aurora, it is generated by low-energy electrons of less than 300 eV derived from the entry layer of the cleft Occasionally, some background or diffuse aurora is also observed, generated by high fluxes of low-energy proton precipitation and characterised by the hydrogen lines Hα and Hβ. On the one exceptional day on which daytime aurora was not observed, magnetic activity was exceptionally low.

These ground-based observations complement satellite studies of analogous auroral events. In particular, the visual characteristics of the different types of daytime aurora may be explained in terms of the flux rates and energy profiles of the electrons that have been mapped in the different regions of the dayside cleft by satellite-borne detectors.

Type
Articles
Information
Polar Record , Volume 30 , Issue 173 , April 1994 , pp. 85 - 96
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Burke, W.J., Kelly, M.C., Sagalyn, R.C., Smiddy, M., and Lai, S.T.. 1979. Polar cap electric field structures with a northward interplanetary magnetic field. Geophysical Research Letters 6 (1): 21–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, S., and Ferraro, V.C.A.. 1931a. A new theory of magnetic storms, part 1. Terrestrial Magnetism and Atmospheric Electricity 36: 77–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, S., and Ferraro, V.C.A.. 1931b. A new theory of magnetic storms, part 2. Terrestrial Magnetism and Atmospheric Electricity 36: 171–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dandekar, B.S., and Pike, C.P.. 1978. The midday, discrete auroral gap. Journal of Geophysical Research 83 (A9): 4227–4236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eather, R.H. 1980. Majestic lights: the aurora in science, history and the arts. Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eather, R.H., and Mende, S.B.. 1971. Airborne observations of auroral precipitation patterns. Journal of Geophysical Research 76 (7): 1746–1755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eather, R.H., and Mende, S.B.. 1972. Systematics in auroral energy spectra. Journal of Geophysical Research 77 (4): 660–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fasel, G., Minow, J.I., Smith, R.W., Deehr, C.S., and Lee, L.C.. 1992. Multiple brightenings of transient dayside auroral forms during oval expansions. Geophysical Research Letters 19 (24): 2429–2432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldstein, Y.I., and Starkov, G.V.. 1967. Dynamics of auraral belt and polar geomagnetic disturbances. Planetary Space Science 15: 209–229.Google Scholar
Formisano, V. 1980. Heos-2 observations of the boundary layer from the magnetopausetothe ionosphere. Planetary Space Science 28: 245–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, L. A., and 13 others. 1986. The theta aurora. Journal of Geophysical Research 91 (A3): 3177–3224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gussenhoven, M.S., Hardy, D.A., and Carovillano, R.L.. 1985. Average electron precipitation in the polar cusps, cleft and cap. In: Holtet, J.A., and Egeland, A. (editors). The polar cusp: proceedings of the NATO Advanced Research Workshop, May 7–12, 1984. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company: 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haerendel, G., and Paschmann, G.. 1975. Entry of solar wind plasma into the magnetosphere. In: Hultqvist, B., and Stenflo, L. (editors). Physics of the hot plasma in the magnetosphere. New York: Plenum: 23–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haerendel, G., Paschmann, G., Sckopke, N., Rosenbauer, H., and Hedgecock, P.C.. 1978. The frontside boundary layer of the magnetosphere and the problem of reconnection. Journal of Geophysical Research 83 (A7): 3195–3216.Google Scholar
Hansen, A.M., Bahnsen, A., and D'Angelo, N.. 1976. The cusp/magnetosheath interface. Journal of Geophysical Research 81 (4): 556–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heikkila, W.J. 1985. Definition of the cusp. In: Holtet, J.A., and Egeland, A. (editors). The polar cusp: proceedings of the NATO Advanced Research Workshop, May 7–12, 1984. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company: 387–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, A.D. 1985. Electron injection in the polar cusp. In: Holtet, J.A., and Egeland, A. (editors). The polar cusp: proceedings of the NATO Advanced Research Workshop, May 7–12, 1984. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company: 47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lockwood, M. 1991. The excitation of ionospheric convection. Journal of Atmospheric and Terrestrial Physics 53: 177–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lui, A.T.Y., and Sibeck, D.G.. 1991. Dayside auroral activities and their implications for impulsive entry processes in the dayside magnetosphere. Journal of Atmospheric and Terrestrial Physics 53: 219–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundin, R. 1985. Plasma composition and flow characteristics inthe magnetosphere boundary layers connected to the polar cusp. In: Holtet, J.A., and Egeland, A. (editors). The polar cusp: proceedings of the NATO Advanced Research Workshop, May 7–12, 1984. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company: 9–32.Google Scholar
Lundin, R. 1988. Acceleration/heating of plasma on auroral field lines: preliminary results from the Viking satellite. Annales Geophysicae 6: 143–152.Google Scholar
McEwan, D.J. 1985. Optical-particle characteristics of the polar cusp. In: Holtet, J.A., and Egeland, A. (editors). The polar cusp: proceedings of the NATO Advanced Research Workshop, May 7–12, 1984. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company: 193–202.Google Scholar
Meng, C-l. 1989. Auroral oval configuration during the quiet condition. In: Sandholt, P.E., and Egeland, A. (editors). Electromagnetic coupling in the polar clefts and caps: proceedings of the NATO Advanced Research Workshop, September 20–24, 1988. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers: 61–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meng, C-l., and Candidi, M.. 1985. Polar cusp features observed by DMSP satellites. In: Holtet, J.A., and Egeland, A. (editors). The polar cusp, proceedings of the NATO Advanced Research Workshop, May 7–12, 1984. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company: 177–192.Google Scholar
Murphree, J.S., Cogger, L.L., Anger, C.D., Ismail, S., and Shepherd, G.D.. 1980. Large scale 6300Å, 5577Å and 3914Å dayside auroral morphology. Geophysical Research Letters 7 (4): 239–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 1991. Solar-geophysical data, part 1. Boulder, Colorado: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Geophysical Data Centre (Prompt Report No. 559:145).Google Scholar
Newell, P.T., and Meng, C-l.. 1989. On quantifying the distinctions between the cusp and the cleft/LLBL. In: Sandholt, P.E., and Egeland, A. (editors). Electromagnetic coupling in the polar clefts and caps: proceedings of the NATO Advanced Research Workshop, September 20–24, 1988. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers: 87–101.Google Scholar
Paschmann, G., Haerendel, G., Sckopke, N., and Rosenbauer, H.. 1976. Plasma and field characteristics of the distant polar cusp near local noon: the entry layer. Journal of Geophysical Research 81 (16): 2883–2899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romick, G.J., and Brown, N.B.. 1971. Midday auroral observations in the oval, cusp region and polar cap. Journal of Geophysical Research 76 (34): 8420–8424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandford, B.P. 1968. Variations of auroral emissions with time, magnetic activity and the solar cycle. Journal of Atmospheric and Terrestrial Physics 30: 1921–1942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandholt, P.E., Deehr, C.S., Egeland, A., Lybekk, B., Viereck, R., and Romick, G.J.. 1986. Signatures in the dayside aurora of plasma transfer from the magnetosheath. Journal of Geophysical Research 91: 10063–10079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandholt, P.E., Egeland, A., Holtet, J.A., Lybekk, B., Svenes, K., and Asheim, S.. 1985. Large and small scale dynamics of the polar cusp region. In: Holtet, J.A., and Egeland, A. (editors). The polar cusp: proceedings of the NATO Advanced Research Workshop, May 7–12, 1984. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company: 163–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sckopke, N. 1985. Plasma and field observations in the exteriorcusp, entry layer and plasma mantle. In: Holtet, J.A. and Egeland, A. (editors). The polar cusp: proceedings of the NATO Advanced Research Workshop, May 7–12, 1984. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company: 1–7.Google Scholar
Sckopke, N., and 7 others. 1981. Structure of the low latitude boundary layer. Journal of Geophysical Research 86 (A4): 2099–2110.Google Scholar
Sibeck, D.G. 1990. A modelforthe transient magnetospheric response to sudden solar wind dynamic pressure variations. Journal of Geophysical Research 95: 3755–3771.Google Scholar
Simmons, D.A.R. 1985. A study of auroral emissions by interference filter photography. Journal of the British Astronomical Association 95: 252–256.Google Scholar
Simmons, D.A.R., and Henriksen, K.. 1992. Discrete polar cap aurora observed from Spitsbergen. Polar Record 28 (166): 191–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, M.F., and Lockwood, M.L.. 1990. The pulsating cusp. Geophysics Research Letters 17 (6): 1069–1072.Google Scholar
Smith, R.W. 1985. Interferometer observations of ion and neutral dynamics inthe polar cusp. In: Holtet, J.A., and Egeland, A. (editors). The polar cusp: proceedings of the NATO Advanced Research Workshop, May 7–12, 1984. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company: 243–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whalen, J.A., Buchau, J.. and Wagner, R.A.. 1971. Airborne aurora. Journal of Atmospheric and Terrestrial Physics 33: 661–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar