Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T06:22:07.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interpretation and evaluation of Harp Seal census data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benjaminsen, T. and Lett, P. F. 1976. A stochastic model for the management of the northwestern Atlantic harp seal Pagophilus groenlandicus population. International Commission for the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries. Research Document, No 76/X/130.Google Scholar
Fisheries and Environment Canada. 1978. The seal hunt, questions and answers. Ottawa, Information Branch, Fisheries and Marine Service, Department of Fisheries and the Environment.Google Scholar
Greenpeace, . 1977. Greenpeace chronicles. Vancouver, BC, Greenpeace Foundation (special edition).Google Scholar
Holt, S. J. and Talbot, L. M. 1978. New principles for the conservation of wild living resources. Wildlife Monographs, No 59, p 133.Google Scholar
ICNAF (International Commission for the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries). 1975. Report of Scientific Advisors to Panel A (Seals). Dartmouth, NS, ICNAF.Google Scholar
ICNAF. 1976. Report of Scientific Advisors to Panel A (Seals). International Commission for the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries. Summary Document, No 76/X11/47.Google Scholar
ICNAF. 1977. Report of the working group on seals. Dartmouth, NS, ICNAF.Google Scholar
IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources). 1972. Red Data Book. Vol 1. Mammalia. Morges, IUCN.Google Scholar
Lavigne, D. M. 1975. Harp seal, Pagophilus groenlandicus, production in the western Atlantic during March 1975. International Commission for the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries. Research Document, No 75/XII/150.Google Scholar
Lavigne, D. M. 1976a. Counting harp seals with ultra-violet photography. Polar Record, Vol 18, No 114, p 269–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavigne, D. M. 1976b. The present status of western Atlantic harp seals: a management consideration. International Commission for the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries. Research Document, No 76/X/133.Google Scholar
Lavigne, D. M. 1978. The harp seal controversy reconsidered. Queen's Quarterly, Vol 85, p 377–88.Google Scholar
Lavigne, D. M. and others. 1975. An aerial census of western Atlantic harp seals (Pagophilus groenlandicus) using ultraviolet photography. International Commission for the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries. Research Document, No 75/X11/144.Google Scholar
Lavigne, D. M. and others. 1977. The 1977 census of western Atlantic harp seals Pagophilus groenlandicus. International Commission for the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries. Research Document, No 77/XI/62 (revised).Google Scholar
Lett, P. F. and Benjaminsen, T. 1977. A stochastic model for the management of the northwestern Atlantic harp seal (Pagophilus groenlandicus) population. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, Vol 34, p 1155–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lett, P. F. and others. 1977. New estimates of harp seal production on the Front and in the Gulf of St Lawrence and their impact on herd management. International Commission for the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries. Research Document, No 77/XI/68 (revised).Google Scholar
Mercer, M. C. 1977. The seal hunt. Ottawa, Information Branch, Fisheries and Marine Service, Department of Fisheries and the Environment.Google Scholar
Mercer, M. C. 1978. Emotionalism fosters the clouding of the issues. Nature Canada, Vol 7, No 2, p 1719.Google Scholar