Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T16:37:30.212Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Research and management of polar bears Ursus maritimus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

Ian Stirling
Ian Stirling
Affiliation:
Canadian Wildlife Service, 5320 122 St, Edmonton, Alberta, CanadaT6H 3S5
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Through the 1950s and 1960s there was a marked increase in recorded numbers of polar bears being killed for their hides, giving rise to world-wide concern that the species might be endangered. At a meeting in Fairbanks, Alaska 1965, representatives of circumpolar arctic nations discussed conservation of polar bears and concluded that international coordination of research and management efforts was essential. Subsequent meetings of scientists engaged in polar bear research were organized every two years by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, facilitating exchanges of views and cooperation; as a result, in 1973 the International Agreement on the Conservation of Polar Bears and their Habitats was signed in Oslo, Norway. This paper describes some of the research and management undertaken in the years leading up to the agreement, and initiatives that are continuing because of it.

Type
Articles
Information
Polar Record , Volume 23 , Issue 143 , 01 May 1986 , pp. 167 - 176
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Best, R. C. and Others. 1981. Physiological indices of activity and metabolism in the polar bear Ursus maritimus. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 146A: 63–74.Google Scholar
Bunnell, F. L. 1974. Computer simulation of forest-wildlife relations. In Black, H. C. (editor). Wildlife and forest management in the Pacific northwest. Corvallis, School of Forestry, Oregon State University.Google Scholar
Delegates, . 1966. Statement of Accord. In Proceedings of the First International Scientific Meeting on the Polar Bear at Fairbanks, Alaska, 6–10 September, 1965. Washington, DC, US Department of the Interior and the University of Alaska, US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Demaster, D. P. and Stirling, I. 1981. Ursus maritimus. Mammalian Species 145: 1–7.Google Scholar
Eaton, R. D. P. and Farant, J. P. 1982. The polar bear as a biological indicator of the environmental mercury burden. Arctic, 35: 422–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flyger, V. M. and Others. 1967. Capturing and handling polar bears: a progress report on polar bear ecological research. Transactions of the North American Wildlife Conference, 32: 107–19.Google Scholar
Folk, G. E. and Others. 1972. Physiological condition of three species of bears in winter dens. IUCN New Series, 23: 107–24.Google Scholar
Gray, P. A. 1984. Bear detection and deterrent research and training program: a progress note. Yellowknife, NWT, Northwest Territories Wildlife Service, Department of Renewable Resources, Government of the Northwest Territories.Google Scholar
Haigh, J. C. and Others. 1983. Immobilization of polar bears with Carfentanil. Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 19: 140–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haigh, J. C. and Others. 1985. Immobilization of polar bears (Ursus maritimus Phipps) with Tiletamine HC1 and Zolazepam HC1. Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 21: 43–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansson, R. and Thomassen, J. 1983. Behavior of polar bears with cubs in the denning area. International Conference on Bear Research and Management 5: 256.Google Scholar
Harington, C. R. 1964. Polar bears and their present status. Canadian Audubon, 26: 4–11.Google Scholar
Harington, C. R. 1968. Denning habits of the polar bear. Canadian Wildlife Service Occasional Papers, 5.Google Scholar
Hurst, R. J. and Others. 1982. Body mass, temperature and cost of walking in polar bears. Ada Physiologica Scandica, 115: 391–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jonkel, C. 1967. Life history, ecology and biology of the polar bear, autumn 1966 studies. Canadian Wildlife Service Progress Notes, 1: 1–18.Google Scholar
Jonkel, C. J. and Others. 1972. Further notes on polar bear denning habits. IUCN New Series, 23: 142–58.Google Scholar
Kolenosky, G. B. and Prevett, J. P. 1983. Productivity and maternity denning of polar bears in Ontario. International Conference on Bear Research and Management, 5: 238–45.Google Scholar
Knudsen, B. M. 1978. Time budgets of polar bears on North Twin Island, James Bay, during summer. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 56: 1827–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen, T. 1976. Polar bear den survey in Svalbard, 1972 and 1973. IUCN New Series, 40.Google Scholar
Larsen, T. 1980. Conservation report of Norway, 1974–1976. In Proceedings of the Sixth Working Meeting of the IUCN Polar Bear Specialists Group, held at IUCN Headquarters, Switzerland, 7–10 December, 1976: 172.Google Scholar
Larsen, T. 1985a. Abundance range and population biology of the polar bear (Ursus maritimus) in the Svalbard area. DPhil thesis, University of Oslo, Norway.Google Scholar
Larsen, T. 1985b. Polar bear denning and cub production in Svalbard. Journal of Wildlife Management, 49: 320–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, P. B. 1981. Spatial relationships and behaviour of polar bears (Ursus maritimus Phipps) concentrated on land during the ice-free season of Hudson Bay. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 59: 1763–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, L. J. and Others. 1981. Immobilization of polar bears (Ursus maritimus Phipps) with ketamine hydrochloride and zylazine hydrochloride. Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 17: 331–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lentfer, J. W. 1968. A technique for immobilizing and marking polar bears. Journal of Wildlife Management. 32: 317–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lentfer, J. W. 1970. Polar bear research and conservation in Alaska, 1968–1969. IUCN New Series, 29: 43–67.Google Scholar
Lentfer, J. W. 1972. Alaska polar bear research and management. IUCN New Series, 35: 21–39.Google Scholar
Lentfer, J. W. 1974. Discreteness of Alaskan polar bear populations. International Game Biology, 11: 323–29.Google Scholar
Lentfer, J. W. 1983. Alaskan polar bear movements from mark and recovery. Arctic, 36: 282–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lentfer, J. W. 1985. Specialist Group with a difference. IUCN Species Survival Commission, 5: 7–8.Google Scholar
LϕNϕ, O. 1970. The polar bear in the Svalbard area. Norsk Polarinstitutt Skrifter, 149: 1–103.Google Scholar
Lunn, N. J. 1984. The ecological significance of supplemental food to polar bears on land during the ice-free period in Hudson Bay. MSc thesis, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manning, T. H. 1971. Geographical variation in the polar bear, Ursus maritimus Phipps. Canadian Wildlife Service Occasional Paper, 13.Google Scholar
Miller, R. L. and Will, G.B. 1974. Use of M99 (etorphine) and antagonists to immobilize and handle black bears. IUCN New Series, 40: 225–34.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. A. and Others. 1983. Behavior, biochemistry and hibernation in black, grizzly and polar bears. International Conference on Bear Research and Management, 5: 284—90.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. A. and Others. 1984. Ratio of serum urea to serum creatinine in wild black bears. Science, 226: 841–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nordenhaug, M. 1970. Harvest and management of the polar bear in Norway. IUCN New Series, 29: 34–42.Google Scholar
Φritsland, N. A. and Lavigne, D. M. 1976. Radiative surface temperatures of exercising polar bears. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, 53A: 327–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Φritsland, N. A. and Others. 1974. Radiative surface temperatures of the polar bears. Journal of Mammology, 55: 459–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, A. 1945. Der Eisbär: Verbreitung und Lebensweise. Copenhagen, E. Bruun.Google Scholar
Ramsay, M. A. and Others. 1985. Reversal of ketamine and rompun immobilization of wild polar bears using yohimbine. Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 21: 396–400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramsay, M. A. and Stirling, I. 1982. Reproductive biology and ecology of female polar bears in western Hudson Bay. Naturaliste Canadien (Revue d'Écologie et de Systematique), 109: 941–46.Google Scholar
Russell, R. H. 1975. The food habits of polar bears of James Bay and southwest Hudson Bay in summer and autumn. Arctic, 28: 117–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweinsburg, R. E. 1981. A brief history of polar bear management in the NWT. Northwest Territories Wildlife Notes, 2: 1–5.Google Scholar
Schweinsburg, R. E. and Others. 1984. Polar bear denning area at Gateshead Island, Northwest Territories. Arctic, 37: 169–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stenhouse, G. 1983. Bear detection and deterrent study, Cape Churchill, Manitoba. NWT Wildlife Service File Report, 37.Google Scholar
Stirling, I. 1974. Midsummer observations on the behavior of wild polar bears. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 52: 1191–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stirling, I. and Latour, P. B. 1978. Comparative hunting abilities of polar bear cubs of different ages. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 56: 1768–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stirling, I. and Others. 1975. Distribution and abundance of polar bears in the eastern Beaufort Sea. Final report to the Beaufort Sea Project. Victoria, BC, Fisheries and Marine Service, Department of the Environment.Google Scholar
Stirling, I. and Others. 1977. The ecology of the polar bear (Ursus maritimus) along the western coast of Hudson Bay. Canadian Wildlife Service Occasional Paper, 33.Google Scholar
Stirling, I. and Others. 1978. Population ecology of the polar bear along the proposed Arctic Islands gas pipeline route. Final report to the Environmental Management Service. Edmonton, Alberta, Department of the Environment.Google Scholar
Stirling, I. and Others. 1980. Population ecology studies of the polar bear in the area of southeastern Baffin Island. Canadian Wildlife Service Occasional Paper, 44.Google Scholar
Stirling, I. and Others. 1984. Polar bear (Ursus maritimus) ecology and environmental considerations in the Canadian High Arctic. In Olson, R., Geddes, F. and Hastings, R. (editors). Northern ecology and resource management. Edmonton, University of Alberta Press: 201–22.Google Scholar
Stirling, I. and Others. 1985. Immobilization of polar bears with Telazol on the western coast of Hudson Bay during summer. Canadian Wildlife Service Progress Notes, 157.Google Scholar
Taylor, M. K. and Others. 1984. Anursus: Age-specific statistics and projection models for populations of polar bears. Final Report to Norsk Polarinstitutt and Northwest Territories Wildlife Service. Vancouver, BC, University of British Columbia, Faculty of Forestry.Google Scholar
Uspenski, S. M. and Chernyavski, F. B. 1965. ‘Maternity home’ of polar bears. Priroda, 4: 81–86. [In Russian].Google Scholar
Uspenski, S. M. and Shilnikov, V. I. 1969. Distribution and the numbers of polar bears in the Arctic according to data of aerial ice surveys. The polar bear and its conservation in the Soviet Arctic. Leningrad, Hydrometeorological Publishing House: 89–102.Google Scholar
Uspenski, S. M. and Kistchinski, A. A. 1972. New data on the winter ecology of the polar bear (Ursus maritimus) on Wrangel Island. IUCN New Series, 23: 181–97.Google Scholar
Uspenski, S. M. and Others. 1980. Polar bear research and conservation in the USSR, 1975–76. In Proceedings of the Sixth Working Meeting of the IUCN Polar Bear Specialists Group, held at IUCN Headquarters, Switzerland, 7–10 12, 1976: 178–86.Google Scholar
Vibe, C. 1980. Summary of Meeting. Proceedings of the Seventh Working Meeting of the IUCN Polar Bear Specialists Group, held at the Arktisk Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark, 30 January–l February, 1979.Google Scholar
Wooldridge, D. R. 1983. Polar bear electronic deterrent and detection systems. International Conference on Bear Research and Management, 5: 264–69.Google Scholar