Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T13:09:23.270Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Response of cold-adapted microbial populations in a permafrost profile to hydrocarbon contaminants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

A.G. Rike
Affiliation:
Norwegian Geotechnical Institute, PO Box 3930 Ullevaal Stadion, N-0806 Oslo, Norway
M. Børresen
Affiliation:
Norwegian Geotechnical Institute, PO Box 3930 Ullevaal Stadion, N-0806 Oslo, Norway
A. Instanes
Affiliation:
Norwegian Geotechnical Institute, PO Box 3930 Ullevaal Stadion, N-0806 Oslo, Norway

Abstract

Heterotrophic and hydrocarbon-degrading microbial populations in soils from different depths in a permafrost soil profile at a hydrocarbon-contaminated site at Ny-Ålesund, Svalbard, were examined and compared to the populations present at a pristine site. The objective was to investigate whether the populations were enhanced after 12 years of exposure to hydrocarbons. Based on air and soil temperature data, it is concluded that the microorganisms living in these environments are cold-adapted. Proliferation of the populations by a factor of 100–1000 was measured in the layers where mineral oil was present in high concentrations. This indicates that the populations responded to the additional carbon source by degradation and growth on hydrocarbons or hydrocarbon metabolites. A high number of intrinsic heterotrophic and hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria is a prerequisite for in situ bioremediation of contaminated sites. Although the hydrocarbon-degrading activities of the populations are not known, the results show that the population sizes probably do not represent the limiting factor in a bioremedial action at this contaminated Arctic permafrost site.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, M. 1982. Most probable number for microbial populations. In: Page, A.L., Miller, R.L., and Keeney, D.R. (editors). Methods of soil analysis. Second edition. Part II: Chemical and microbiological properties. Madison, Wl: American Society of Agronomy/Soil Science Society of America: 815820.Google Scholar
Atlas, R.M. 1997. Handbook of microbiological media. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Clein, J.S., and Schimel, J.P.. 1995. Microbial activity of tundra and taiga soils at sub-zero temperatures. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 27 (9): 12311234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flanagan, P.W., and Bunnell, F.L.. 1980. Microflora activities and decomposition. In: Brown, J., Miller, P.C., Tieszen, L.L., and Bunnell, F.L. (editors). An Arctic ecosystem: the costal tundra at Barrow, Alaska. Stroudsburg, PA: Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross: 291333.Google Scholar
Gilichinsky, D.A., Vorobyova, L.G., Erokinhina, D.G., Fyodorov, D.G., and Chaikovskaya, N.R.. 1992. Long term preservation of microbial ecosystems in permafrost. Advances in Space Research 14 (4): 255263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilichinsky, D.A., AND Wagener, S. 1995. Microbial life in permafrost: a historical review. Permafrost and Periglacial Processes 6: 243250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazen, A. 1911. Discussion: dams on sand foundations. Transactions, American Society of Civil Engineers 73: 199205.Google Scholar
Kristensen, M. 1988. Climatic conditions and permafrost development on the Svalbard archipelago. Frost Actions in Soils 27: 2426.Google Scholar
Krzyszowska, A. 1988. Human impact on the tundra environment at Ny-Ålesund, Svalbard. Oslo: Norsk Polarinstitutt (Report 45).Google Scholar
Krzyszowska-Waitkus, A. 1997. The effect of oil spill and traffic in the vicinity of Ny-Ålesund, Svalbard. Unpublished report to Kings Bay Kull Companie and Norsk Polarinstitutt. Laramie, WY: University of Wyoming.Google Scholar
Morita, R.Y. 1975. Psychrophilic bacteria. Bacteriological Review 39: 144167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nixon, J.F., and McRoberts, E.C.. 1973. A study of some factors affecting the thawing of frozen soils. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 10 (3): 439452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norwegian Metrological Institute. 1999. Metrological data files. Oslo: Norwegian Metrological Institute, Climate Department.Google Scholar
Russell, N.J. 1990. Cold adaption of microorganisms. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B326: 595611.Google ScholarPubMed
Sand, K. 1999. Soil temperatures. In: Bruland, O., and Marechal, D.. Energy and water balance of active layer 1991–1994, Understanding land Arctic physical processes 1996–1998. Trondheim: SINTEF Civil and Environmental Engineering (Report STF A98417).Google Scholar
Shi, T., Reeves, R., Gilichinsky, D.A., and Friedman, E.I.. 1997. Characterisation of viable bacteria from Siberian permafrost by 16S rDNA sequencing. MicrobialEcology 33:169179Google ScholarPubMed
Sveum, P. 1987. Accidentally spilled gas-oil in a shoreline sediment on Spitsbergen: natural fate and enhancement of biodegradation. In: Proceedings of tenth AMOP technical seminar, June 9–11, Edmonton, Alberta: 177192.Google Scholar
Tumeo, M.A., and Guinn, D.A.. 1997. Evaluation of bioremediaton in cold regions. Journal of Cold Regions Engineering 11 (3): 221231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whyte, L.G., Bourbonnière, L., Bellrose, C., and Greer, C.W.. 1999. Bioremediation assessment of hydrocarbon contaminated soils from the high Arctic. Bioremediation Journal 3: 6979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar