Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T12:44:38.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A satellite-based map compared to a traditional vegetation map of Arctic vegetation in the Ny-Ålesund area, Svalbard

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

Sigmund Spjelkavik
Sigmund Spjelkavik
Affiliation:
The University Courses on Svalbard, PO Box 156, N-9170 Longyearbyen, Norway
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An area of Arctic vegetation on Brøggerhalvøya in the northwestern part of Spitsbergen, was studied. A classified Landsat-TM image with 57 land-cover classes (LCCs) was compared to an existing vegetation map with a comparison matrix. The 57 LCCs were grouped in seven different groups, where the seventh group contained 15 LCCs with vegetation. The other groups were regarded as non-vegetated. The correspondence between the existing vegetation map and the satellite-based vegetation map was not high, but the classes from the satellite-based land-cover map could be interpreted in botanical terms. A vegetation index (VI) was used to discriminate between vegetated and non-vegetated LCCs. The VI was correlated to plant biomass measurements, and the total plant biomass for Brøggerhalvøya was estimated. The estimated biomass coincided with other estimates from the same area.

Type
Articles
Information
Polar Record , Volume 31 , Issue 177 , April 1995 , pp. 257 - 269
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brattbakk, I. 1981. Brøggerhalvøya, Svalbard, vegetasjonskart 1:10,000. Oslo: Norsk Polarinstitutt.Google Scholar
Brattbakk, I. 1986. Flora og vegetasjon. In: Øritsland, A. (editor). Svalbardreinen og dens livsgrunnlag. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget: 15–34.Google Scholar
Brossard, T., and Joly, D.. 1994. Probability models, remote sensing and field observation: test for mapping some plant distributions in Kongsfjord area, Svalbard. Polar Research 13 (1): 153–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cihlar, J., LeDrew, E., Edel, H., Evans, W., McKay, D., McNutt, L., and Royer, A.. 1989. Contribution of satellite observations to the Canadian Global Change Program. Ottawa: Canadian Global Change Program (Report 3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Congalton, R.G. 1991. A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of Environment 37: 35–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elvebakk, A. 1985. Higher phytosociological syntaxa on Svalbard and their use in subdivision of the Arctic. Nordic Journal of Botany 5: 273–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elvebakk, A. 1990. A new method for defining biogeographical zones in the Arctic. In: Kotlyakov, V.M., and Sokolov, V.E. (editors). Arctic research: advances and prospects: proceedings of the conference of Arctic and nordic countries on coordination of research in the Arctic, Leningrad, December 1988. Moscow: Nauka: II, 175–186.Google Scholar
Elvebakk, A. 1994. A survey of plant associations and aliances from Svalbard. Journal of Vegetative Science 5: 791–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elven, R., Eriksen, M-B., Elvebakk, A., Johansen, B., and Engelskjøn, T.. 1990. Gipsdalen, central Svalbard: flora, vegetation, and botanical values. In: Brekke, B., and Hansson, R. (editors): Environmental atlas Gipsdalen, Svalbard, vol II. Oslo: Norsk Polarinstitutt (Rapport 61): 27–66.Google Scholar
Ferguson, R.S. 1991. Detection and classification of muskox habitat om Banks Island, Northwest Territories, Canada, using Landsat Thematic Mapper data. Arctic 44 (supplement 1): 66–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folving, S. 1986. Mapping and monitoring of vegetation in south-west Greenland by means of Landsat MSS data. Bulletin du Comité Français de Cartographie 109–110 (3–4): 44–51.Google Scholar
Hansen, B.U., and Mosbech, A.. 1994. Use of NOAAAVHRR data to monitor snow cover and spring meltoff in the wildlife habitats in Jameson Land, East Greenland. Polar Research 13 (1): 125–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, R. 1987. Satellite remote sensing. London and New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Hisdal, V. 1985. Geography of Svalbard. Second edition. Oslo: Norsk Polarinstitutt (Polarhåndbok 2).Google Scholar
Hjelle, A., and Lauritzen, Ø.. 1982. Geological map of Svalbard 1:500,000. Sheet 3G: Spitsbergen northern part. Oslo: Norsk Polarinstitutt (Skrifter 154 C).Google Scholar
Kalliola, R., and Syrfänen, K.. 1991. To what extent are vegetation types visible in satellite imagery? Annales Botanici Fennici 28: 45–57.Google Scholar
Kärnefelt, I., Mattsson, J.-E., and Thell, A.. 1993. The lichen genera Arctocetraria, Cetraria and Cetrariella (Parmeliaceae) and their presumed evolutionary affinities. Bryologist 96: 394–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lillesand, T.M., and Kiefer, R.W.. 1979. Remote sensing and image interpretation. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Markon, C.J., and Derksen, D.V.. 1994. Identification of tundra land cover near Teshekpuk Lake, Alaska, using SPOT satellite data. Arctic 47 (3): 222–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosbech, A., and Hansen, B.U.. 1994. Comparison of satellite imagery and infrared aerial photography as vegetation mapping methods in an Arctic study area: Jameson Land, East Greenland. Polar Research 13 (1): 139–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nilsen, L., and Spjelkavik, S.. 1993. Phytosociological and remote sensing studies of changes in vegetation pattern on a glacier forefield of Uversøyra, northwest Spitsbergen. Poster presentation at Global change and Arctic terrestrial ecosystems: an international conference, 21–26 08 1993, Oppdal, Norway.Google Scholar
Norsk Polarinstitutt. 1989. Kongsfjorden: Landsat satellite image map 1:100,000. Sheet A7S. Oslo: Norsk Polarinstitutt.Google Scholar
Pearce, C.M. 1991. Mapping muskox habitat in the Canadian high Arctic with SPOT satellite data. Arctic 44 (supplement 1): 49–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, C.R., and Lautenschlager, L.F.. 1984. Functional equivalence of spectral vegetation indices. Remote Sensing of Environment 14: 169–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, J.C. 1992. Estimating vegetation amount from visible and near infrared reflectances. Remote Sensing of Environment 41: 29–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rees, W.G. 1990. Physical principles of remote sensing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, A.J., and Everitt, J.H.. 1992. Using spectral vegetation indices to estimate rangeland productivity. Geocarto International 1: 63–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenfield, G.H., and Fitzpatrick-Lins, K.. 1986. A coefficient of agreement as a measure of thematic classification accuracy. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 52 (2): 223–227.Google Scholar
Rønning, O.I. 1965. Studies in Dryadion of Svalbard. Oslo: Norsk Polarinstitutt (Skrifter 134).Google Scholar
Spjelkavik, S. 1994. Landsat-5 TM data as a tool in mapping of vegetation, reindeer grazing areas, and terrestrial surface temperatures on Svalbard. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Tromsø.Google Scholar
Spjelkavik, S., and Elvebakk, A.. 1989. Mapping winter grazing areas for reindeer on Svalbard using Landsat Thematic Mapper data. In: Guyenne, T.-D., and Calabresi, G. (editors). Proceedings of workshop on Earthnet Pilot Project on Landsat Mapper Applications, Frascati, Italy, December 1987. Noordwijk: European Space Agency (ESA SP-1102): 199–206.Google Scholar
Staaland, H., Scheie, J.O., Grøndahl, F.A., Persen, E., Leifseth, A.B., and Holand, Ø.. 1993. The introduction of reindeer to Brøggerhalvøya, Svalbard: grazing preference and effect on vegetation. Rangifer 13 (1): 15–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steffensen, E.L. 1982. The climate at Norwegian Arctic stations. Klima 5.Google Scholar
Summerhayes, V.S., and Elton, C.S.. 1928. Further contribution to the ecology of Spitsbergen. Journal of Ecology 16: 193–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talbot, S.S., and Markon, C.J. 1986. Vegetation mapping of Nowitna National Wildlife Refuge, Alaska, using Landsat MSS digital data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 52 (6): 791–799.Google Scholar
Tolgensbakk, J., and Sollid, J.L.. 1987. Kvadehuksletta, geomorfologi og kvartërgeologi 1:10,000. Oslo: Geografisk Institutt, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Tucker, C.J. 1979. Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation. Remote Sensing of Environment 8: 127–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, C.J., and Sellers, P.J.. 1986. Satellite remote sensing of primary production. International Journal of Remote Sensing 7 (11): 1395–1416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wegener, C., Hansen, M., and Jacobsen, L. Bryhn. 1992. Effekter av reinbeite ved Kongsfjorden, Svalbard. Meddelelser Norsk Polarinstitutt 121: 31–54.Google Scholar
Ødegaard, H., and Øritsland, N.A.. 1980. Mapping polar vegetation at Spitsbergen by use of Landsat. Oslo: Norsk Polarinstitutt (MAB and IBM a/s report).Google Scholar