Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-26T19:52:28.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Individuals Writ Large: An Epilogue on the “Ecological Fallacy”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2017

Lutz Erbring
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

For more than three decades, social scientists have struggled with the statistical consequences of aggregation. Ever since Robinson (1950) first shocked a whole generation of social scientists with his demonstration of the “ecological fallacy,” much has been written about alleged fallacies, biases, pitfalls, and hazards of one kind or another lurking behind aggregate data and about strategies for circumventing them (Goodman, 1953, 1959; Blalock 1964; Scheuch 1966; Alker 1969; Shively 1969, 1974; Hannan 1971; Hammond 1973; Meckstroth 1974; Hanushek, Jackson, and Kain 1974; Hannan and Burstein 1974; Irwin and Lichtman 1976; Smith 1977; Langbein and Lichtman 1978). Intrigued—or alarmed—by the recurrent observation that correlations and regressions based on aggregate data (group means) often differ dramatically from those based on individual data, researchers have sought to answer the traditional question of ecological analysis: under what conditions can inferences to individual-level (micro) relationships be made from group-level (macro) data?

Type
Research Article
Information
Political Analysis , Volume 1 , 1989 , pp. 235 - 269
Copyright
Copyright © by the University of Michigan 1990 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alker, Hayward R. Jr. 1969. “A Typology of Ecological Fallacies. In Quantitative Ecological Analysis in the Social Sciences, ed. Dogan, M. and Rokkan, S. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Blalock, Hubert M. Jr. 1964. Causal Inferences in Nonexperimental Research. Chapel Hill, N.C.: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Coleman, James S., et al. 1966. Equality of Educational Opportunity. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Goodman, Leo. 1953. “Ecological Regression and the Behavior of Individuals. American Sociological Review 18: 663–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, Leo. 1959. “Some Alternatives to Ecological Correlation.” American Journal of Sociology 64: 610–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, J. L. Jr. 1973. “Two Sources of Error in Ecological Correlations.” American Sociological Review 38: 764–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hannan, Michael T. 1971. Aggregation and Disaggregation in Sociology. Lexington, Mass.: Heath-Lexington.Google Scholar
Hannan, Michael T. 1976. “Aggregation Gain Reconsidered. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
Hannan, Michael T., and Burstein, Leigh. 1974. “Estimation from Grouped Observations.” American Sociological Review 39: 374–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanushek, Eric. A., Jackson, John E., and Kain, J. F. 1974. “Model Specification, Use of Aggregate Data, and the Ecological Correlation Fallacy.” Political Methodology 1: 87–106.Google Scholar
Irwin, Laura, and Lichtman, A. J. 1976. “Across the Great Divide: Inferring Individual Level Behavior from Aggregate Data.” Political Methodology 3: 411–39.Google Scholar
Johnston, J. 1972. Econometric Methods. 2d ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Kerlinger, Fred N. 1973. Foundations of Behavioral Research. 2d ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Kramer, Gerald H. 1983. “The Ecological Fallacy Revisited: Aggregate vs. Individual-Level Findings on Economics and Elections and Sociotropic Voting.” American Political Science Review 77: 92–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langbein, Laura I., and Lichtman, A. J. 1978. Ecological Inference. Beverly Hills: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meckstroth, Ted W. 1974. “Some Problems in Cross-Level Inference.” American Journal of Political Science 18: 45–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prais, S. J., and Aitchison, J. 1954. “The Grouping Of Observations in Regression Analysis.” Review of the International Statistical Institute 22: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, W. S. 1950. “Ecological Correlations and the Behavior of Individuals.” American Sociological Review 15: 351–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shively, W. Phillips. 1969. “Ecological Inference: The Use of Aggregate Data to Study Individuals.” American Political Science Review 63: 1183–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shively, W. Phillips. 1974. “Utilizing External Evidence in Cross-Level Inference.” Political Methodology 1: 61–74.Google Scholar
Smith, K. W. 1977. “Another Look at the Clustering Perspective on Aggregation Problems.” Sociological Methods and Research 5: 289–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theil, Henri. 1971. Principles of Econometrics. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
United Kingdom Government, Ministry of Health. 1964. Deformities Caused by Thalidomide. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar